From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Cannot connect to the routing master on port 25 Best Pracices analyzer
results.. on Exchange 2007 (removed 2003)...
Date:
10/05/2007
20:56:19
markm75 wrote:
>I had successfully migrated all public folders over to
2007.. changed
>the RUS server setting on exchange 2003.. then removed
the routing
>group connector in system manager on exchange 2003 from
both servers..
>
>If i now run the analyzer it gives me that error.. I'm
sure it is rgc
>related, but i'm not sure how to fix it, or if its a
problem.. (i have
>exchange 2003 offline, but havent run the uninstall of
it yet)...
Because E2K3 is still present in the routing group there
should be a
Routing Group Master. E2K7 doesn't use Routing Groups.
You can ignore
that error (unless you have other E2K3 servers).
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Bharat Suneja [MVP] <bharat@nospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: A way to globally link a managed default folder policy to all mailboxes,
rather than 1 by 1 in 2007 Exchange?
Date:
10/05/2007
11:44:38
No, that's remarkable in its absence. You can use a
particular account as a
template when creating a new account, or apply using a
command and have it
run on a schedule.
Applying Managed Folder Policy to more than one user
http://exchangepedia.com/blog/2007/05/applying-managed-folder-policy-to-more.html
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"markm75" wrote in message
news:1191591593.082262.317220@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> I've setup a default folder (retension) policy and
linked it to a few
> mailboxes to see if it works.. so far so good.. but i'd
like to do
> this for all mailboxes at one time, or maybe even have
it enabled for
> all, then when a new box is added, it automatically
gets applied..
>
> Is there a way to do this?
>
> Thanks
>
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Adding external e-mail addresses to Global address book
Date:
10/04/2007
15:12:58
On Thu,
4 Oct 2007 15:01:16
-0500, "David Douglas"
wrote:
>You could use LDIFDE, although it may take a bit to get
the input file
>formated correctly. ADModify is another tool that might
help you. Or
>if you are the scripting type then you can use ADSI.
>
>
True enough. I tend to suggest the simplest option for
the users.
Making the LDIFDE is a bit of a nause. That's best for
pulling a load
of information out, editing it and importing it again
into a different
forest or some other scenario. Making a fresh ldf file
from scratch
ain't real pretty.
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Adding external e-mail addresses to Global address book
Date:
10/04/2007
14:19:27
On Thu,
4 Oct 2007 12:06:02
-0700, Just Guessing
wrote:
>I have a client with Exchange 2003 that wants to add 100
external e-mail
>addresses to their Global Address List. I know how to
add a contact, but it
>will take them forever to add all of them.
>
>Is there a better way to add external addresses? Is
there a totally
>different way I'm not thinking about?
>
>Thanks!
Sure. Google for CSVDE which will let you add all of them
in one fell
swoop from a simple CSV file. All you have to do is get
the headings
right and you'll be fine.
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Anouncment / Auto Reply
Date:
10/04/2007
16:59:14
On Thu,
4 Oct 2007 14:55:01
-0700, Adam
wrote:
>The physical place where exchange is , is different from
my office. So if my
>office burned to the ground I would have access to my
exchange system.
Ah, ok. So the mail still comes in, you just cant get to
it from the
office.
But why couldnt you get to it via OWA or RPC over HTTPS
from another
location other than the office?
>
>Sounded like a good idea.
>Thanks for the help.
>
>"Andy David {MVP}" wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007
14:45:01
-0700, Adam
>> wrote:
>>
>> >How about on the entire server or by info store?
>>
>> Nothing natively.
>>
>> I would still think you would generate this somewhere
else rather than
>> at the place that is down.
>>
>> >
>> >"Andy David {MVP}" wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007
11:57:03
-0700, Adam
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Is it possible to configure Exchange 2003 to have
an auto reply or
>> >> >anouncement to all mail sent to a user/ group/ or
information store?
>> >>
>> >> Not from a group, no.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >What I am looking for is a method to turn on an
auto reply in the event I
>> >> >have an enviromental disaster.
>> >> >
>> >> >I would like to make an anoucement that we are
unable to reply to email due
>> >> >to ..... what ever the issue is.
>> >> >My server is hosted off site so Exchange will
still be running.
>> >> >This way my customers will understand why we have
not responded to them
>> >> >quickly.
>> >> >
>> >> >Basically make an OOO message for all my users (or
users by group) but kick
>> >> >it off from the server.
>> >>
>> >> I would ask the whomever is hosting your messaging
enviroment.
>> >> Of course if its down there, the auto-reply wouldnt
be generated
>> >> either yes?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >Adam
>> >>
>>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Anouncment / Auto Reply
Date:
10/04/2007
16:47:52
On Thu,
4 Oct 2007 14:45:01
-0700, Adam
wrote:
>How about on the entire server or by info store?
Nothing natively.
I would still think you would generate this somewhere
else rather than
at the place that is down.
>
>"Andy David {MVP}" wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007
11:57:03
-0700, Adam
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Is it possible to configure Exchange 2003 to have an
auto reply or
>> >anouncement to all mail sent to a user/ group/ or
information store?
>>
>> Not from a group, no.
>>
>> >
>> >What I am looking for is a method to turn on an auto
reply in the event I
>> >have an enviromental disaster.
>> >
>> >I would like to make an anoucement that we are unable
to reply to email due
>> >to ..... what ever the issue is.
>> >My server is hosted off site so Exchange will still
be running.
>> >This way my customers will understand why we have not
responded to them
>> >quickly.
>> >
>> >Basically make an OOO message for all my users (or
users by group) but kick
>> >it off from the server.
>>
>> I would ask the whomever is hosting your messaging
enviroment.
>> Of course if its down there, the auto-reply wouldnt be
generated
>> either yes?
>>
>>
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Adam
>>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Anouncment / Auto Reply
Date:
10/04/2007
16:22:56
On Thu,
4 Oct 2007 11:57:03
-0700, Adam
wrote:
>Is it possible to configure Exchange 2003 to have an
auto reply or
>anouncement to all mail sent to a user/ group/ or
information store?
Not from a group, no.
>
>What I am looking for is a method to turn on an auto
reply in the event I
>have an enviromental disaster.
>
>I would like to make an anoucement that we are unable to
reply to email due
>to ..... what ever the issue is.
>My server is hosted off site so Exchange will still be
running.
>This way my customers will understand why we have not
responded to them
>quickly.
>
>Basically make an OOO message for all my users (or users
by group) but kick
>it off from the server.
I would ask the whomever is hosting your messaging
enviroment.
Of course if its down there, the auto-reply wouldnt be
generated
either yes?
>
>Thanks,
>Adam
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Antispam
Date:
10/05/2007
19:43:02
"Phil McNeill" wrote:
>GFI ME has 8 or 10 different filters it will run a
message through including
>DNSBLs, directory harvesting checks, a Bayesian filter
that can be trained
>to recognize SPAM and a variety of others. Each filter
can be
>enabled/disabled and configured independently (i.e. you
don't have to use
>them all, although most people do). Out of the box it
works quite well,
>however before you actually turn on the filtering they
recommend that you
>leave it in just learning mode to start with for a week
or so. That allows
>it to auto-populate your whitelist (it does this by
watching your outbound
>mail and whitelisting all addresses you send to),
All those OOF messages! :-)
>as well as train the
>Bayesian filter to suit your organization. This is all
automatic.
Without guidance, how does the Bayesian filter learn?
Statistical filters work well for individuals. For
enterprises, not so
well. One person's spam is another one's mailing list.
IOW, don't
place a large dependence on this technique, no matter
what the
proponents say. The tokenizer is the key part of
statistical filters.
What parts of the message will be used as tokens? What
parts of images
will participate? Is whitespace the boundary for words?
Or does the
tokenizer chop the message into fixed sized chunks (say,
five
characters)? Do the tokens overlap? Important questions
if you have to
deal with written languages that don't depend on
whitespace to
separate words. :-)
>With DNSBLs, you generally want to pick just a few, as
they slow your
>inbound mail.
Slow? They'll stop it if you're not careful.
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Archive Old Mails in Public Folder
Date:
10/03/2007
12:52:30
On
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:50:59
+0800, "Gabriel Chua"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am running an Exchange 2003, I have a Public Folder
with thousands of sub
>folders and thousands of mail items. Is there a quick
way to move those old
>mails dated before year 2006 to a .pst files?
To a pst? Not really. Has to be done via Outlook.
>
>TIA,
>Gabriel
>
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Archiving
Date:
10/03/2007
12:28:43
Zantaz EAS can archive PF's too.
Oliver
Top
From:
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Are my HOST Records set correctly?
Date:
10/05/2007
14:49:58
DAiuto wrote:
> To be honest. I'm not really sure.
> I was thrown into this mess and I don't want to make
changes that
> could be there for a reason.
> To give you the layout:
> We have a T1 that comes into the Router, which goes
into the VPN. The
> VPN to the Switch, which has the workstations and
servers connected
> to it.
> Server 1 is an application server running terminal
server, and Server
> 2 is a web and Exchange server.
> Server1 also hosts the RDP sessions for 6 remote sites
through the VPN
> hardware.
OK - not sure what to tell you. The problem you're having
isn't to do with
Exchange. :(
>
> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
>
>> DAiuto wrote:
>>> To answer your recent question: Prodigy is blocking
the
>>> 63.238.167.172 IP address.
>>> I'm sorry, I just saw your comment about the NPR from
your old post
>>> a few days ago. I noticed you made a note of it
again. I'm going to
>>> add that and see if it makes a difference. Will that
take a few
>>> days to update because of DNS or will it be
immediate?
>>> Also looking at the post from a few days ago the
firewall's external
>>> IP address is 10.0.0.1 which links to the Kentrox
router.
>>
>> So your internal network is behind two devices which
are each doing
>> NAT? Why?
>>
>>> The
>>> router's external IP is .169 which has NAT global
IPs. IP
>>> 63.238.167.172 is mapped to 10.0.0.1. Along with
..170 ...171 while
>>> ...173 jumps right to 192.168.1.11 (address of the
>>> webserver/exchange server).
>>>
>> Something smells fishy here....this doesn't make a lot
of sense to
>> me.
>>
>>>
>>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
>>>
>>>> DAiuto wrote:
>>>>> I was checking out my VPN and it has a Port
Forwarding setting
>>>>> that is concerning me. This was supposed to be
specific for mail.
>>>>> The setting has:
>>>>> Modify Packet Filter Rule = Yes
>>>>> Incoming interface =
Internet
Port
>>>>> Source Address = Any
>>>>> Destination Address = Any
>>>>> Services = tcp/21, tcp/20, tcp/80, tcp/443, tcp/25,
tcp/23
>>>>> To: 192.168.1.11 (This is the address to the
combination
>>>>> webserver/Exchange server)
>>>>> __________
>>>>> Since the Modify Packet Filter Rule is checked
'Yes', here is the
>>>>> packet filter rule:
>>>>> Action = Accept
>>>>> Type = Forward
>>>>> Incoming Interface =
Internet
Port
>>>>> Outgoing Interface = Any
>>>>> Source Address = Any
>>>>> Destination Address = 192.168.1.11
>>>>> Services = tcp/21, tcp/20, tcp/80, tcp/443, tcp/25,
tcp/23
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this look right?
>>>>> Shouldn't there be something in there for smtp?
>>>>
>>>> I'm honestly not sure what your firewall is or
should be doing
>>>> here. As I said, there should be no need for a
one-to-one NAT
>>>> ...you ought to be able to use the WAN interface IP
for
>>>> everything, and just do port forwarding/triggering.
Try changing
>>>> it and see if this helps. Note that the ..172
address PTR isn't
>>>> mail.simoneye.com- if you're going to use it, I'd
change it to
>>>> that one.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the error message I get when I send an
email to a Prodigy
>>>>> member (keep in mind, they said they have already
removed me
>>>>
>>>> Which IP??
>>>>
>>>>> from the
>>>>> blacklist, something must be triggering it to put
us back on):
>>>>> "The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
>>>>>
>>>>> Joe Jones (joejones@prodigy.net) on 9/27/2007
2:07 PM
>>>>> The message cannot be delivered due to a
configuration
>>>>> error on the server. Please contact your
Administrator.
>>>>> >>>>> flpi118,DNSBL:To request removal of,
63.238.167.172, send the
>>>>> complete error message in an E-mail to
>>>>> removeme@sbc.sbcglobal.net>"
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________________________
>>>>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> DAiuto wrote:
>>>>>>> Sorry about that.
>>>>>>> The full IP address is 63.238.167.173 or .172
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, your MX record is mail.simoneye.com, which
points to .173
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have a firewall configured with .172 as its
external
>>>>>> interface IP, but have a one-to-one NAT for .173,
I suppose that
>>>>>> might explain something. I'm not sure, but I'm
also not sure it's
>>>>>> relevant. This isn't the most common configuration
- there'sno
>>>>>> reason you can't just use port forwarding on a
single public IP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The domain name is simoneye.com
>>>>>>> Here is the exact header the recipient gets:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks. I'm not sure why you're posting headers,
though. You said
>>>>>> you were getting "booted from certain domains" -
which means, you
>>>>>> must be getting NDRs. That's what we would need to
see.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did notice that the .173 address has a PTR, but
the PTR
>>>>>> specifies your domain (simoneye.com) and not a
host (
>>>>>> ____.simoneye.com) - since you clearly get to
customize your
>>>>>> PTR, I suggest you make it match your MX record ?
>>>>>> greeting on your server, which is
mail.simoneye.com. That said,
>>>>>> the PTR for .172 is your ISP's default - you may
want to change
>>>>>> that,as it's the PTR the recipient servers will
look up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From Ron D'Aiuto Mon Sep 24 07:00:09
2007
>>>>>>> Return-Path:
>>>>>>> Authentication-Results: mta209.mail.re4.yahoo.com
>>>>>>> from=simoneye.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
>>>>>>> Received: from 63.238.167.172 (EHLO
mail.simoneye.com)
>>>>>>> (63.238.167.172) by mta209.mail.re4.yahoo.com
with SMTP; Mon,
>>>>>>> 24 Sep 2007
07:00:03
-0700 Content-class:
>>>>>>> urn:content-classes:message Subject: Test
>>>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>>>> Content-Type: multipart/related;
>>>>>>> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7FEB3.36A50E35";
>>>>>>> type="multipart/alternative"
>>>>>>> Disposition-Notification-To: "Ron D'Aiuto"
>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007
10:00:09
-0400
>>>>>>> Message-ID:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thread-Topic: Test
>>>>>>> Thread-Index: Acf+sze/uFrU/XkRTWC8Ygo5DOjbXA==
>>>>>>> From: "Ron D'Aiuto"
>>>>>>> To:
>>>>>>> Content-Length: 7270
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> DAiuto wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I didn't configure our Exchange account so I'm
trying to back
>>>>>>>>> track and fix a couple issues.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi - what's the exact text of the NDR the
recipient gets? Also,
>>>>>>>> it would make it a lot easier to help you if you
hadn't munged
>>>>>>>> all the relevant info (your domain name/IP
addresses).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We keep getting booted from certain domains
>>>>>>>>> like Prodigy.net The IP address listed in a
recipients email
>>>>>>>>> header shows XXX.XXX.XXX.172
>>>>>>>>> My Host records show Hostname = @; Record type
= A (Address);
>>>>>>>>> Address = XXX.XXX.XXX.173;
>>>>>>>>> and Hostname = mail; Record type = A (Address);
Address =
>>>>>>>>> XXX.XXX.XXX.173;
>>>>>>>>> In my Mail Host Records I have Hostname = @
(none); Record
>>>>>>>>> type = MX; Address = mail.mydomain.com.; Pref =
10;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The recipient header shows:
>>>>>>>>> From John Doe Mon Sep 24
07:00:09 2007
>>>>>>>>> Return-Path:
>>>>>>>>> Authentication-Results:
mta209.mail.re4.yahoo.com
>>>>>>>>> from=mydomain.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
>>>>>>>>> Received: from 63.238.167.172 (EHLO
mail.mydomain.com)
>>>>>>>>> (63.238.167.172) by mta209.mail.re4.yahoo.com
with SMTP; Mon,
>>>>>>>>> 24 Sep 2007
07:00:03
-0700 Content-class:
>>>>>>>>> urn:content-classes:message Subject: Test
>>>>>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: multipart/related;
>>>>>>>>>
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7FEB3.36A50E35";
>>>>>>>>> type="multipart/alternative"
>>>>>>>>> Disposition-Notification-To: "John Doe"
>>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007
10:00:09
-0400
>>>>>>>>> Message-ID:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thread-Topic: Test
>>>>>>>>> Thread-Index: Acf+sze/uFrU/XkRTWC8Ygo5DOjbXA==
>>>>>>>>> From: "John Doe"
>>>>>>>>> To:
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 7270
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is this correct? What could be causing the IP
change when mail
>>>>>>>>> is being sent? I would appreciate any help.
>>>>>>>>> I'm having issues that I really need to get
fixed.
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> DAIUTO
Top
From:
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Are my HOST Records set correctly?
Date:
10/03/2007
11:01:49
DAiuto wrote:
> To answer your recent question: Prodigy is blocking the
> 63.238.167.172 IP address.
> I'm sorry, I just saw your comment about the NPR from
your old post a
> few days ago. I noticed you made a note of it again.
I'm going to add
> that and see if it makes a difference. Will that take a
few days to
> update because of DNS or will it be immediate?
> Also looking at the post from a few days ago the
firewall's external
> IP address is 10.0.0.1 which links to the Kentrox
router.
So your internal network is behind two devices which are
each doing NAT?
Why?
> The
> router's external IP is .169 which has NAT global IPs.
IP
> 63.238.167.172 is mapped to 10.0.0.1. Along with ..170
...171 while
> ...173 jumps right to 192.168.1.11 (address of the
webserver/exchange
> server).
>
Something smells fishy here....this doesn't make a lot of
sense to me.
>
> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
>
>> DAiuto wrote:
>>> I was checking out my VPN and it has a Port
Forwarding setting that
>>> is concerning me. This was supposed to be specific
for mail.
>>> The setting has:
>>> Modify Packet Filter Rule = Yes
>>> Incoming interface =
Internet
Port
>>> Source Address = Any
>>> Destination Address = Any
>>> Services = tcp/21, tcp/20, tcp/80, tcp/443, tcp/25,
tcp/23
>>> To: 192.168.1.11 (This is the address to the
combination
>>> webserver/Exchange server)
>>> __________
>>> Since the Modify Packet Filter Rule is checked 'Yes',
here is the
>>> packet filter rule:
>>> Action = Accept
>>> Type = Forward
>>> Incoming Interface =
Internet
Port
>>> Outgoing Interface = Any
>>> Source Address = Any
>>> Destination Address = 192.168.1.11
>>> Services = tcp/21, tcp/20, tcp/80, tcp/443, tcp/25,
tcp/23
>>>
>>> Does this look right?
>>> Shouldn't there be something in there for smtp?
>>
>> I'm honestly not sure what your firewall is or should
be doing here.
>> As I said, there should be no need for a one-to-one
NAT ...you ought
>> to be able to use the WAN interface IP for everything,
and just do
>> port forwarding/triggering. Try changing it and see if
this helps.
>> Note that the ..172 address PTR isn't
mail.simoneye.com- if you're
>> going to use it, I'd change it to that one.
>>
>>>
>>> Here is the error message I get when I send an email
to a Prodigy
>>> member (keep in mind, they said they have already
removed me
>>
>> Which IP??
>>
>>> from the
>>> blacklist, something must be triggering it to put us
back on):
>>> "The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
>>>
>>> Joe Jones (joejones@prodigy.net) on 9/27/2007
2:07 PM
>>> The message cannot be delivered due to a
configuration
>>> error on the server. Please contact your
Administrator.
>>> >>> request removal of, 63.238.167.172, send the
complete error message
>>> in an E-mail to removeme@sbc.sbcglobal.net>"
>>
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________________________
>>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
>>>
>>>> DAiuto wrote:
>>>>> Sorry about that.
>>>>> The full IP address is 63.238.167.173 or .172
>>>>
>>>> Well, your MX record is mail.simoneye.com, which
points to .173
>>>>
>>>> If you have a firewall configured with .172 as its
external
>>>> interface IP, but have a one-to-one NAT for .173, I
suppose that
>>>> might explain something. I'm not sure, but I'm also
not sure it's
>>>> relevant. This isn't the most common configuration -
there'sno
>>>> reason you can't just use port forwarding on a
single public IP.
>>>>
>>>>> The domain name is simoneye.com
>>>>> Here is the exact header the recipient gets:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. I'm not sure why you're posting headers,
though. You said
>>>> you were getting "booted from certain domains" -
which means, you
>>>> must be getting NDRs. That's what we would need to
see.
>>>>
>>>> I did notice that the .173 address has a PTR, but
the PTR specifies
>>>> your domain (simoneye.com) and not a host (
____.simoneye.com) -
>>>> since you clearly get to customize your PTR, I
suggest you make it
>>>> match your MX record ?
>>>> mail.simoneye.com. That said, the PTR for .172 is
your ISP's
>>>> default - you may want to change that,as it's the
PTR the recipient
>>>> servers will look up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> From Ron D'Aiuto Mon Sep 24 07:00:09
2007
>>>>> Return-Path:
>>>>> Authentication-Results: mta209.mail.re4.yahoo.com
>>>>> from=simoneye.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
>>>>> Received: from 63.238.167.172 (EHLO
mail.simoneye.com)
>>>>> (63.238.167.172) by mta209.mail.re4.yahoo.com with
SMTP; Mon, 24
>>>>> Sep 2007 07:00:03
-0700 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>>>>> Subject: Test
>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>> Content-Type: multipart/related;
>>>>> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7FEB3.36A50E35";
>>>>> type="multipart/alternative"
>>>>> Disposition-Notification-To: "Ron D'Aiuto"
>>>>> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007
10:00:09
-0400
>>>>> Message-ID:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thread-Topic: Test
>>>>> Thread-Index: Acf+sze/uFrU/XkRTWC8Ygo5DOjbXA==
>>>>> From: "Ron D'Aiuto"
>>>>> To:
>>>>> Content-Length: 7270
>>>>>
>>>>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> DAiuto wrote:
>>>>>>> I didn't configure our Exchange account so I'm
trying to back
>>>>>>> track and fix a couple issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi - what's the exact text of the NDR the
recipient gets? Also,
>>>>>> it would make it a lot easier to help you if you
hadn't munged
>>>>>> all the relevant info (your domain name/IP
addresses).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We keep getting booted from certain domains
>>>>>>> like Prodigy.net The IP address listed in a
recipients email
>>>>>>> header shows XXX.XXX.XXX.172
>>>>>>> My Host records show Hostname = @; Record type =
A (Address);
>>>>>>> Address = XXX.XXX.XXX.173;
>>>>>>> and Hostname = mail; Record type = A (Address);
Address =
>>>>>>> XXX.XXX.XXX.173;
>>>>>>> In my Mail Host Records I have Hostname = @
(none); Record type
>>>>>>> = MX; Address = mail.mydomain.com.; Pref = 10;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The recipient header shows:
>>>>>>> From John Doe Mon Sep 24 07:00:09
2007
>>>>>>> Return-Path:
>>>>>>> Authentication-Results: mta209.mail.re4.yahoo.com
>>>>>>> from=mydomain.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
>>>>>>> Received: from 63.238.167.172 (EHLO
mail.mydomain.com)
>>>>>>> (63.238.167.172) by mta209.mail.re4.yahoo.com
with SMTP; Mon,
>>>>>>> 24 Sep 2007
07:00:03
-0700 Content-class:
>>>>>>> urn:content-classes:message Subject: Test
>>>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>>>> Content-Type: multipart/related;
>>>>>>> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7FEB3.36A50E35";
>>>>>>> type="multipart/alternative"
>>>>>>> Disposition-Notification-To: "John Doe"
>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007
10:00:09
-0400
>>>>>>> Message-ID:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thread-Topic: Test
>>>>>>> Thread-Index: Acf+sze/uFrU/XkRTWC8Ygo5DOjbXA==
>>>>>>> From: "John Doe"
>>>>>>> To:
>>>>>>> Content-Length: 7270
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this correct? What could be causing the IP
change when mail
>>>>>>> is being sent? I would appreciate any help.
>>>>>>> I'm having issues that I really need to get
fixed.
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> DAIUTO
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: block public folder deletion
Date:
10/03/2007
20:11:27
You could restructure the folders so that there is a
parent folder.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Gavin
Hanover" wrote in message
news:5722AB6A-A813-4BE2-999C-D662046AE5D6@microsoft.com...
> There are no client permissions on the parent folders,
as the parent
> folder
> is the root. The administrative rights assigned to the
root Public Folders
> and PF in question in ESM do not allow anyone but
admins to delete (she is
> not an admin).
>
> The user in question is a member of Domain Users,
Mobile Users, and 2
> distribution groups. Nothing that should have
administrative rights.
>
> Does 'Folder Owner' in client permissions allow
deletion of the entire
> public folder?
>
> "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> The rights for each role are pretty clearly spelled
out. I believe that
>> what you need to do is set the rights on the folder
above the one in
>> question so that she can't delete objects.
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> "Gavin
Hanover"
wrote in message
>>
news:E29DED99-920E-4F89-A367-F8351E0FB36D@microsoft.com...
>> >I have a client that is regularly deleting a Public
Folder (Exchange
>> >2003)
>> >in
>> > Outlook.
>> > Every time she does I have to recover it using
PFDAVAdmin, mail enable
>> > it,
>> > and set the email addresses (3 times this month).
>> >
>> > As far as I can tell, it is basically default
Administrative and
>> > Directory
>> > rights, and she has 'Owner' in Client permissions.
Which specific
>> > permissions/rights are used to block her from being
able to remove this
>> > public folder, but still have full access to the
contents of the
>> > folder?
>>
>>
>>
Top
From:
Neil Hobson [MVP] <neil.hobson@nospam.silversands.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Built in HELP causes Exchange System Manger crash
Date:
10/04/2007
08:54:59
I'd rather have two replies than none! ;)
--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP
http://www.msexchange.org/Neil_Hobson/
http://www.msexchangeblog.com
"Oliver Moazzezi [MVP]" wrote in message
news:OKvND0oBIHA.3548@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Is that bad luck?
>
> Oliver
>
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Built in HELP causes Exchange System Manger crash
Date:
10/04/2007
08:46:47
Is that bad luck?
Oliver
Top
From:
Neil Hobson [MVP] <neil.hobson@nospam.silversands.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Built in HELP causes Exchange System Manger crash
Date:
10/04/2007
08:42:22
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=932513
--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP
http://www.msexchange.org/Neil_Hobson/
http://www.msexchangeblog.com
"StanTech" wrote in message
news:6483D043-62DF-45C7-B4EC-ED789334C155@microsoft.com...
>I have Exchange 2003 SP2 running on SBS2003(R2). When I
try to use any of
> the help functions it causes Exchange System Manager to
shutdown with
> error
> message Exchange xxxxx has encountered and error and
has to shutdown. The
> MMC
> for Exchange also throws errors when using Exchange.
Other things that
> use
> MMC and other built in helps work correctly.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
>
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Built in HELP causes Exchange System Manger crash
Date:
10/04/2007
08:41:57
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/932513
Oliver
"StanTech" wrote in message
news:6483D043-62DF-45C7-B4EC-ED789334C155@microsoft.com...
>I have Exchange 2003 SP2 running on SBS2003(R2). When I
try to use any of
> the help functions it causes Exchange System Manager to
shutdown with
> error
> message Exchange xxxxx has encountered and error and
has to shutdown. The
> MMC
> for Exchange also throws errors when using Exchange.
Other things that
> use
> MMC and other built in helps work correctly.
>
> Any suggestions?
> Oliver
>
>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Cannot open PST created by ExMerge
Date:
10/05/2007
15:44:49
On
Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:12:30
+0200, "M. Ali Qureshi"
wrote:
>Mails are nomore on the server mailbox. i choosed
"archive" option in
>ExMerge.
Is it stil within the deleted item retention time? If so,
then they
should still be recoverable. Google for DumpsterAlwaysOn.
If using Exch 2003, use the Recovery Storage Group
otherwise.
>
>I do not have a brick level backup, only full database
backup and there are
>alot of other users in the same databaser on server, i
would not like to
>restore all of it.
>
>Any other way to recover from this large PST? spliting
it in 2 with some 3rd
>party program? Any?
>
>Ali
>
>"Andy David {MVP}" wrote in message
>news:t2ccg3tkbkl53qqgeo4des5it5lrrhdkkk@4ax.com...
>> On
Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:24:00
+0200, "M. Ali Qureshi"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Ok, that makes sense. Though this limitation from MS
doesnt!
>>>
>>>But is there any way of recovering data? or spliting
the file in 2 without
>>>loosing mails?
>>
>> Best bet would be to re-run Exmerge against that
mailbox and filter on
>> dates to make smaller psts.
>> If that mailbox is already empty, and you will have to
recover those
>> emails.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>Ali
>>>
>>>"Andy David {MVP}" wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:jc5cg35e35f735m1bjp1035en2uaajjlkj@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007
10:33:25
+0200, "M. Ali Qureshi"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Size is: 2063392KB (1.96GB)
>>>>>
>>>>>I am not sure what version of PST file is created
when we use Exmerge to
>>>>>extract mails?!?
>>>>
>>>> Ansi
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I have tried to open it with outlook 2003 and
outlook 2007 without any
>>>>>luck.
>>>>
>>>> That is very close, actually really over the limit
an ansi pst can be.
>>>> 1.8GB is about as large as they can go. Thats
probably what caused
>>>> the corruptoin.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Regards
>>>>>
>>>>>Ali
>>>>>
>>>>>"Susan" wrote in message
>>>>>news:uNnHpmpBIHA.2004@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> how large is it? what version is the pst file?
what version Outlook?
>>>>>> version mismatch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Susan Conkey [MVP]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "M. Ali Qureshi" wrote in message
>>>>>>
news:9E133C05-4BCA-408F-B824-F587606253A5@microsoft.com...
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I used exmerge to extract mails from a mailbox
using "archive"
>>>>>>> function
>>>>>>> so they get deleted on the server. The process
went ok with a few
>>>>>>> "non
>>>>>>> fatal errors". I used the date range to extract
all mails from
>>>>>>> january
>>>>>>> 2002 to december 2005. But i cannot open the PST
file created by
>>>>>>> exmerge.
>>>>>>> I get an error saying that i should run scanpst
utility to fix
>>>>>>> errors.
>>>>>>> When i try the utility, it also crashes with an
error. I am unable to
>>>>>>> import mails from this PST into outlook.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MAQ
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Changing Domain - How does this affect Exchange?
Date:
10/04/2007
18:00:18
There are a lot of resources out there that can help you
with that. Google
"Exchange 2003" "recipient policy".
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Jeremy Flint" wrote in message
news:1191507724.095667.294290@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> Yeah, the both have the same information in them, so I
guess I will
> delete the one with the lower priority.
>
> So what options do I select when adding the new policy?
Email address
> and Mailbox Manager settings?
>
> Thanks for your help so far.
>
> On Oct 3,
11:59 pm, "Ed Crowley
[MVP]"
> wrote:
>> Be aware that only the first policy that matches will
be applied to
>> mailboxes. I don't know why you have two, perhaps you
ought to figure
>> out
>> why, and then decide where to add the new address, or
whether to delete
>> one
>> of the policies.
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> "Jeremy Flint" wrote in message
>>
>>
news:1191446819.808342.140150@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > Okay, When I goo into System Manager, and expand
Recipients, and view
>> > Recipient Policies, there are already two policies.
One is called
>> > Default Policy, the other is DomainName. Default has
the Lowest
>> > Priority, the other has Highest Priority.
>>
>> > When I create a new policy, do I only select Email
Addresses, or
>> > select Mailbox Manager Settings as well from the
Property Pages?
>>
>> > On Oct 3, 3:50 pm,
ome.master.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> All you really need to do is add the new domain
under the recipient
>> >> policy and set that as your default.
>> >> Once it is the default for that user, that is the
domain it will be
>> >> sent from. You do not have to change your internal
domain.
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Changing Domain - How does this affect Exchange?
Date:
10/03/2007
23:59:58
Be aware that only the first policy that matches will be
applied to
mailboxes. I don't know why you have two, perhaps you
ought to figure out
why, and then decide where to add the new address, or
whether to delete one
of the policies.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Jeremy Flint" wrote in message
news:1191446819.808342.140150@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> Okay, When I goo into System Manager, and expand
Recipients, and view
> Recipient Policies, there are already two policies. One
is called
> Default Policy, the other is DomainName. Default has
the Lowest
> Priority, the other has Highest Priority.
>
> When I create a new policy, do I only select Email
Addresses, or
> select Mailbox Manager Settings as well from the
Property Pages?
>
> On Oct 3,
3:50 pm,
ome.master.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>> All you really need to do is add the new domain under
the recipient
>> policy and set that as your default.
>> Once it is the default for that user, that is the
domain it will be
>> sent from. You do not have to change your internal
domain.
>
Top
From:
Dave Nickason [SBS MVP] <gwdibble@NOSPAM.frontiernet.net>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Connection to Exchange unavailable when outside of the LAN
Date:
10/04/2007
17:51:33
That sounds like an issue with the external DNS, so
hopefully if you get
that "does not match" thing sorted out you'll be good to
go.
You can try Start -> Run -> Outlook.exe /rpcdiag, which
will bring up a box
telling you what's going on with the RPC connection. I've
never gotten any
useful information from it, but my problems have been
certificate-based.
Yours sounds like networking, so maybe you'll have better
luck.
I'm going to be away with no web access until Tuesday, so
hopefully someone
else can post some suggestions if you don't get it
working in the morning.
"OscarVogel" wrote in message
news:e%23740dtBIHA.1356@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Thanks for responding but I actually did manually
choose the "Trusted Root
> Certification Authority" store instead of the default.
>
> I'm wondering if the problem may be DNS related
especially since;
>
> I see "The name on the security certificate is invalid
or does not match
> the name of the site." which still appears as a
security alert when I us
> IE to connect to RWW.
>
> And also the fact that I am NOT able to connect to
> https://remote.[company].com/remote (as specified in
the RWW's
> instructions). Although I AM able to connect to
> "WWW.remote.[company].com/remote.
>
> Tomorrow morning I will try to fix that "invalid or
does not match the
> name" problem, which I know shouldn't be happening
anyway, and see if that
> happens to fix it.
>
> I'd appreciate any suggestions at all at least
regarding steps to find the
> source of the problem.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> might have something to do with
> "Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" wrote in
> message news:uWlPpStBIHA.5652@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Try installing the certificate again, except when you
do it, manually
>> choose the "Trusted Root Certification Authority"
instead of the default.
>> That's the only other thing I can think of, as long as
you're setting up
>> the connection from outside the LAN. I've had
instances where I've
>> configured it and had it working on the LAN, but had
to do the
>> certificate install again from outside to get it to
connect properly.
>>
>>
>> "OscarVogel" wrote in message
>> news:ewXIolsBIHA.5600@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> That did NOT work (unless I VPN). I was very careful
to follow the RWW's
>>> instructions for configuring RPC over HTTP. But after
doing so;
>>>
>>> -When I open Outlook, at first "Trying to connect..."
shows in the
>>> lower right hand corner for approximately 30 seconds,
then it changes to
>>> "disconnected". When I try to Send/Receive, I get
these 2 errors.
>>> ---Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server' reported error
(0x8004011D): the
>>> server is not available...
>>> ---Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server - Sending'
reported error
>>> (0x80040115): The connection to the is unavailable.
Outlook must be
>>> online or connected to complete this action.
>>>
>>> IS IT POSSIBLE THAT ANY OF THESE ISSUES COULD BE
CAUSING THE PROBLEM?
>>>
>>> -When I tried to "Verify that the computer trusts the
certificate used
>>> by the server", I was NOT able to connect using
>>> https://remote.[company's domain name]/remote. ("The
page cannot be
>>> displayed. The page you are looking for is currently
unavailable..." But
>>> I WAS able to at least connect using
www.remote.[company's domain
>>> name]/remote.
>>>
>>> -When I used IE to connect to "www.remote.[company's
domain
>>> name]/remote", I installed the certificate in the
"Trusted root
>>> certificate" store. That took care of the "cert not
trusted" message,
>>> but it STILL shows "The name on the security
certificate is invalid or
>>> does not match the name of the site." (Although I am
able to click on
>>> "proceed" to access the site.)
>>>
>>> -And to log on to the RWW site, "[Windows Domain
Name]\[User Name]" does
>>> NOT work, but [User Name] (w/out domain) DOES work.
>>>
>>> I'm guessing that I have something configured wrong
on the server. Let
>>> me know if I can provide any additional info. Can any
of you give me
>>> any advice on what could be stopping both RPC over
HTTP from working?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" wrote in
>>> message
news:%23dwqpdrBIHA.5600@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>> Connect to RWW from outside the LAN. If you don't
have your firewall
>>>> configured to allow this, connect the VPN first
while you're
>>>> configuring this. On the RWW main page, click
"Configure Outlook via
>>>> the Internet." Print the resulting document and
follow the steps
>>>> exactly, which will configure Outlook to connect
using RPC over HTTPS.
>>>> You will need to open port 443 in the firewall to
allow this, if it's
>>>> not already.
>>>>
>>>> Now, when he opens Outlook, he'll be prompted for
his username and
>>>> password, but Outlook will connect seamlessly to the
Exchange server,
>>>> and work just as it does when he's in the office.
You may want to
>>>> configure the send/receive and other settings in
Outlook for better
>>>> performance when working remotely.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "OscarVogel" wrote in message
>>>> news:eOsc2UrBIHA.4584@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>> I'm trying to set up Outlook 2003 on a Sales Rep's
laptop. I've
>>>>> configured it to use Cached Exchange Mode. The
Exchange server is on
>>>>> a SBS 2003 Standard Edition server. Everything
seems to work OK from
>>>>> the office. But when I take the laptop home, I get
this error
>>>>> message;
>>>>>
>>>>> "The connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server is
unavailable.
>>>>> Outlook must be online to complete this action."
>>>>>
>>>>> After that a dialog box appears showing the
Exchange server's address
>>>>> (using public IP address) and the mailbox. When I
click the button to
>>>>> check name I get another popup that says;
>>>>>
>>>>> "The name could not be resolved... (then repeats
the previous error
>>>>> message).
>>>>>
>>>>> Then if I first make a VPN connection to the
Exchange server,
>>>>> everything seems to work OK again, just like when
at the office. BUT
>>>>> at some point the server's address changes from the
public IP address
>>>>> to the local DNS address (i.e.,
"[server].[domain].local").
>>>>>
>>>>> The Sales Rep would rather not make a VPN
connection every time he
>>>>> wants to use Outlook.
>>>>>
>>>>> How can I get Outlook to work over the internet
without using a VPN?
>>>>> Or is there some other way I should be approaching
this? Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Correct way to change email address for user?
Date:
10/03/2007
20:24:19
Add a new address and set it as primary. I don't believe
that you must
uncheck the RUS checkbox, but it's probably a good thing
if you do.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"UselessUser" wrote in message
news:1626458B-265C-49B3-B096-C4D26E45FC45@microsoft.com...
> Hi,
>
> Can you clarify which method you meant?
>
> Do people simply change the alias or do they add an
SMTP address and
> untick
> that box?
>
> "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Your method is safe. Be aware that if you uncheck that
box, and later
>> want
>> to undertake a massive readdressing scheme, such as if
you change your
>> e-mail domain, this mailbox will be skipped. But using
the RUS to do
>> that
>> is generally problematic anyway so I wouldn't
recommend it.
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> "UselessUser" wrote in message
>>
news:B3F13830-88F9-4338-8E23-9707D5F71873@microsoft.com...
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have a few questions related to the RUS in
Exchange 2003 I believe..
>> >
>> > If I create a new user the following happens:
>> >
>> > Name: Jane Bloggs
>> > Username: JBloggs
>> > Alias: JBloggs
>> >
>> > Default Policy so the email address created is
therefore
>> > JBloggs@company.com
>> >
>> > If this person gets married and therefore their name
changes, what is
>> > the
>> > recommended procedure for changing their smtp
address? If I add an
>> > extra
>> > SMTP
>> > address and set it as primary, I then have to untick
the automatically
>> > update
>> > address option which means any changes I may make
later to the
>> > recipient
>> > policy will not reach them... so I was wondering, is
changing the alias
>> > the
>> > recommended approach or not? Doing this will surely
cause the RUS to
>> > update
>> > the user account with the new address (Whilst
keeping the existing
>> > address
>> > as
>> > a secondary)...
>> >
>> > What is the correct method? Is changing the alias
safe?
>> >
>> > Also in an MSPress book (70-284 p8-14) it states
that there is a
>> > real-world
>> > problem if the recipient policy is changed, and the
user has an alias
>> > which
>> > is different to their email address for example
email address is
>> > bob@company.com whilst alias is bhope for example,
and that in this
>> > scenario,
>> > exchange overwrites the address instead of leaving
it as a secondary
>> > address... is this true? (Or was this true pre SP2)
>> >
>> > Sorry if this is confusing...
>>
>>
>>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Corrupt reoccurring appointment in Public folder Calendar
Date:
10/04/2007
17:35:06
On Thu,
4 Oct 2007 15:25:43
-0700, "Susan"
wrote:
>not again...?
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Corrupt reoccurring appointment in Public folder Calendar
Date:
10/04/2007
16:59:30
On Thu,
4 Oct 2007 14:58:30
-0700, "Susan"
wrote:
>before I'd run eseutil, I'd try to just delete it via a
shift delete, or via
>pfdavadmin, then recreate it...
Beer me!
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Corrupt reoccurring appointment in Public folder Calendar
Date:
10/04/2007
16:48:56
On Thu,
4 Oct 2007 14:44:01
-0700, John
wrote:
>Hi All. We are running Exchange 2003 Server. There is a
reoccurring
>appointment in one of our Public folder Calendars that
appears to corrupt.
>When Double clicked or right clicked on I get the
message: CAN'T OPEN THIS
>ITEM. THE OPERATION FAILED. We exported to a .pst and
imported back in with
>no change. Are there any utilities to run to fix this?
ESEutil was not run on
>the Public folders Store yet.
>
>Thanks
>Johnny Jobber
And you cant delete the appt with a shift-delete, via OWA
etc...?
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: creating SG and Store quickly
Date:
10/05/2007
21:31:03
Chris wrote:
>I have tried this script. It cretes SG but put
transaction logs in a default
>location on C:. I need to put it on D:.
Use the force!
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms876490.aspx
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: creating SG and Store quickly
Date:
10/05/2007
15:15:41
On
Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:51:00
-0700, Chris
wrote:
>Is there a way to create Storage groups and stores
quickly, maybe using a
>script? and add to system policy after that
automatically even better. This
>could be on a new server or on an existing production
server. We use the
>same SG and store names and location (drive) for all
servers. Manual workis
>slow and subject to inconsistance.
>
>Thanks.
This is in the Exchange Server cookbook which you should
own!!!! :-)
http://techtasks.com/code/viewbookcode/1259
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Customized
Date:
10/04/2007
00:02:14
It means someone made some change to the setting outside
the Delegation
Wizard. Permissions are permissions; what you see in
Exchange System
Manager reflect what's in Active Directory but ESM shows
rights as Exchange
roles. "Customized" means that the rights aren't an exact
match for a role.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"TwistedPair" wrote in message
news:%23c4RSCjBIHA.5960@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Thanks for that explanation. So for instance, for the
properties of the
> account in question, in security settings, there would
have to be
> something set there other than what is default to
exchange right?
>
> Is it correct to assume that permissions set in ADUC
override the perms
> set in ESM?
>
> Thank you again.
>
> "Andy David {MVP}" wrote in
> message
news:a2c8g31n8g66icc4tft22lpcd5n62tqaap@4ax.com...
>> On
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:54:38
-0700, "TwistedPair"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I feel completely retarded, but the only thing I found
like that in ADUC
>>>was
>>>the "delegate control" wizard, and there was nothing
there. Any ideas?
>>
>> If custom permissions were applied via the security
tab or via
>> adsiedit rather than ESM , theyll show as custom in
ESM.
>>
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>
>>>"Betelgeuse" wrote in message
>>>news:eTGvIjfBIHA.4568@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> In AD....open the Delegation Wizard in ADUC. You
should see the same
>>>> accounts....with the ability to customize
permissions...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "TwistedPair" wrote in message
>>>> news:ef1P6gfBIHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>> All,
>>>>> Suppose I open up ESM, then right-click at the top
of the tree, and
>>>>> choose the delegation wizard . . . Suppose further
that there are
>>>>> several
>>>>> users listed there that show as "Exchange Full
Administrator
>>>>> (Customized)". Where is it being customized from?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you help me?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Customized
Date:
10/03/2007
19:14:41
On
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:54:38
-0700, "TwistedPair"
wrote:
>I feel completely retarded, but the only thing I found
like that in ADUC was
>the "delegate control" wizard, and there was nothing
there. Any ideas?
If custom permissions were applied via the security tab
or via
adsiedit rather than ESM , theyll show as custom in ESM.
>
>Thanks!
>
>"Betelgeuse" wrote in message
>news:eTGvIjfBIHA.4568@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> In AD....open the Delegation Wizard in ADUC. You
should see the same
>> accounts....with the ability to customize
permissions...
>>
>>
>> "TwistedPair" wrote in message
>> news:ef1P6gfBIHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> All,
>>> Suppose I open up ESM, then right-click at the top of
the tree, and
>>> choose the delegation wizard . . . Suppose further
that there are several
>>> users listed there that show as "Exchange Full
Administrator
>>> (Customized)". Where is it being customized from?
>>>
>>> Can you help me?
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>
>>
>
Top
