From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Does the Ed Crowley Move Server Method for Exchange 2000, work the same for
2003?
Date:
10/04/2007
16:26:54
On Thu,
04 Oct 2007 11:22:13
-0700, Robert Gordon
wrote:
>I'm about to do an Exchange 2003 migration, and just
wanted to be sure
>that the move server method for 2000 applies to 2003
just as well.
yes.
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Email account
Date:
10/04/2007
05:52:47
Re-reading your question I see you do indeed mean that.
To only allow the user to recieve internal mails go into
ADUC, then the
Properties of the user in question | Exchange General |
Delivery
Restrictions | Accept Messages
To stop the user from sending messages out, two options
can be used.
1. Give the user a bogus non routable address so they can
still send out,
but no one can reply ( my personally least preferred
way).
2. Disallow the user from sending out to the Internet on
the SMTP connector
in ESM, First Administrative Group | Routing Groups |
Connectors | default
SMTP Connector | Delivery Restrictions | Add them to
'Reject Messages From'
Oliver
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Email account
Date:
10/04/2007
05:42:40
Do you mean to lock it down so the user can only send and
recieve
internally?
Oliver
"2Sweet" wrote in message
news:eYjUqWmBIHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> MS Exchange 2003.
> Can i configure such that only a particular email user
account can only
> allow send and receive internal emails?
>
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: email delivery failing
Date:
10/05/2007
19:57:30
mvlbv wrote:
>On Oct 4,
10:15 pm, "Rich
Matheisen [MVP]"
> wrote:
>> mvlbv wrote:
>>
>> >I've been noticing emails starting to bounce back
from hotmail and aol
>> >with a refuse (Action: failed
>> >Status: 5.7.1 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.7.1
Requested action not
>> >taken: message refused)
>>
>> Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see any of
those messages
>> being rejected. Each status is a 2xx.
>>
>> Since each of the RCPT TO command is /to/ your domain,
and your SMTP
>> log shows them being received by your server, why
would you think
>> they're being rejected by hotmail or aol? Both of
those ISP are
>> sending the messages, not receiving them.
>>
>> --
>> Rich Matheisen
>> MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
>> MS Exchange FAQ
athttp://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.p...@getronics.com
>> Or to these, either: mailto:h.p...@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuc...@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuc...@pinkroccade.com
>
>the interesting thing is that aol is working now but
hotmail is still
>failing. I just got a few new complaints of other
customers getting
>bounce backs when trying to email me. Where else could I
look for the
>reason of the refuse?
The first place is to find out what the NDR they receive
has to say.
If that doesn't help, then move to the SMTP Protocol Log,
but look for
status codes in the 5xx range. Those are permanent
failures. If you
don't find them, do you find any 4xx status codes?
Are there any devices or software between your Internet
connection and
your Exchange server's SMTP Virtual Server? Are you grey
listing?
Using DNS RBLs? Blacklisting?
If you don't find anything like the above, start checking
for timeouts
in the SMTP Protocol Log. Disconnections might be
involved, too. Do
you see complete SMTP transactions, or are they stopping
after, say,
the MAIL FROM command (or the RCPT TO command)? You may
need a network
monitor to work with these.
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: email delivery failing
Date:
10/04/2007
21:15:44
mvlbv wrote:
>
>I've been noticing emails starting to bounce back from
hotmail and aol
>with a refuse (Action: failed
>Status: 5.7.1 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Requested
action not
>taken: message refused)
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see any of those
messages
being rejected. Each status is a 2xx.
Since each of the RCPT TO command is /to/ your domain,
and your SMTP
log shows them being received by your server, why would
you think
they're being rejected by hotmail or aol? Both of those
ISP are
sending the messages, not receiving them.
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2003 Server - Recommended Size Limits
Date:
10/05/2007
15:09:09
On
Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:16:04
-0700, Sandy M
wrote:
>Is there a recommended size limit for the Information
Store and mailboxes
>for Exchange Server 2003?
>
>We have about 65 mailboxes and an 80gb hard drive that
the Information
>Store resides on.
>
>The Private Information Store is currently about 30gb.
>
>The owners of our company would like to enforce size
limits.
>
>Thanks,
Why do you want to enforce limits? If you enforce limits
what are the
users going to do with the email they can't bring
themselves to
delete? Users are all the same, they love to keep stuff
and if you
won't let them store it in Exchange they'll just use PST
files. If
they use PST files they'll either keep them on the PC and
blame you
when they screw up or they'll keep them on the file
server and blow
your storage sky high.
Anyway the answer to your question is that your limit is
75GB in
Standard Edition which I'm guessing is what you have. 65
users and
75GB of mail isn't a bad number to work to.
Not terribly keen about the hard drive though. Backups,
resiliency,
protection on that?
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 - Fail to apply search optimization
Date:
10/05/2007
20:44:27
On
Sat, 06 Oct 2007
00:24:56
-0000, mcarroll76@gmail.com wrote:
>Thank you for the reply but I have already searched the
Microsoft
>Knowledge base. None of the articles in your link apply
to this
>error.
>
>If you'll notice the Event Log detail I posted, you'll
see that Event
>ID contains another error code. I cannot find any
information on the
>internal error 1162. That is why I'm posting here.
Running Isinteg in fix mode would probably fix those
errors.
>
>
>
>
>On Oct 4,
4:47 pm,
mcarrol...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm getting an error on my Exchange 2007 repeatedly.
I'd like to get
>> this error corrected. The only solution I have found
in my searching
>> is to ignore the error. Any advice is appreciated.
Here is the Event
>> Log entry:
>>
>> Event Type: Warning
>> Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store
>> Event Category: General
>> Event ID: 1025
>>
Date: 10/4/2007
>> Time:
4:39:11 PM
>> User: N/A
>> Computer: GEMINI
>> Description:
>> An error occurred on database "First Storage
Group\Mailbox Database".
>> Function name or description of problem:
Restrict/SetSearchCriteria
>> Error: 1162 Warning: fail to apply search optimization
to folder (FID
>> 6-3611F4) Retrying without optimization.
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 - Fail to apply search optimization
Date:
10/04/2007
18:22:07
http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1025?
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
wrote in message
news:1191534436.924282.219710@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting an error on my Exchange 2007 repeatedly.
I'd like to get
> this error corrected. The only solution I have found in
my searching
> is to ignore the error. Any advice is appreciated. Here
is the Event
> Log entry:
>
> Event Type: Warning
> Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store
> Event Category: General
> Event ID: 1025
>
Date: 10/4/2007
> Time:
4:39:11 PM
> User: N/A
> Computer: GEMINI
> Description:
> An error occurred on database "First Storage
Group\Mailbox Database".
> Function name or description of problem:
Restrict/SetSearchCriteria
> Error: 1162 Warning: fail to apply search optimization
to folder (FID
> 6-3611F4) Retrying without optimization.
>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 Clustering
Date:
10/03/2007
17:36:04
On
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:57:57
-0400, "David" wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I have never clustered before, but I am thinking about
clustering my
>Exchange 2007 server. I deployed this server a few
months ago and went live
>with it 2 weeks ago. At the time I really didn't expect
to cluster this
>server, but now that it is in production I would really
like the benefit of
>the redundancy. I have a VMware ESX server running on my
network and I was
>hoping to install a second copy of Exchange on a 2003
Enterprise
server VM
>and cluster it with our existing Exchange. Does anyone
have any advice or
>procedures on how I can cluster an existing Exchange
2007 to a new one?
>Thanks for all your help.
>
>My goal would be to provide complete Exchange redundancy
in case of hardware
>or software failure.
>
>
>Dave
>A+, Network+, MCP
>
There are certainly a few options there ( CCR, SCR).
Running Exch on VMWare is not supported however.
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 licensing
Date:
10/04/2007
18:02:28
You could install some freeware variant of Unix. Most of
them come with an
e-mail system.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"John" wrote in
message news:uD44y3pBIHA.2268@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
> wrote in message
>
news:1191474721.812896.144800@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Hey John, I'd love to know where you heard that -
because last I
>> heard, M$ had discontinued the practice of including
Outlook rights
>> with CALs in Exchange 2007! Much to everyone's
chagrin.. as this is
>> why they want people to buy the Outlook licenses on
top of the CAL's
>> now. If you know different, it would make many people
happy to have a
>> source for that info..
>
> Like most admins, I am not qualified to answer
licensing questions. My
> previous post was just my understanding about Exchange
licensing terms. Of
> course I may be dead wrong about it. I'm in no mood to
read MS licensing
> terms. Tell you the truth, the more I read it the more
confused I become.
>
>> Sounds like your M$ rep is trying to score a big sale
at your expense..
>
> Aren't most of them the same? They go for the option
that generates the
> most $$$ for them.
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 licensing
Date:
10/04/2007
00:06:13
Nobody participating in these forums is qualified to
quote licensing terms
on behalf of Microsoft. Please contact your Microsoft
representative or
reseller, and/or check out the Microsoft Exchange
licensing page:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/howtobuy/default.mspx#EIC
Have you referred to Microsoft's licensing web site? If
you talk to various
people authorized to quote licensing terms to you and you
get different
answers, then my advice would to accept the advice that's
most favorable to
you.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Phil McNeill" wrote in
message news:uFiQpgfBIHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>I have talked to an MS account rep and a reseller's
liensing rep. The
>latter didn't really seem to know, and the former is
telling me that I have
>to pay for a client I'm not going to use. I'd like to
know what other
>people's experience has been here.
>
> Thanks
>
> "Michael Dragone" wrote in message
>
news:27C026B7-EEE0-4304-BB52-6C4DF62DA9F7@microsoft.com...
>> The difference is that the user/device
CAL for
Exchange 2007 doesn't
>> include the right to use Outlook 2007.
>> In any event, you should really refer all licensing
questions directly to
>> Microsoft or to your Microsoft Reseller.
>>
>> "Phil McNeill" wrote in
>> message news:uPnGhJfBIHA.3564@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> We currently have 500 Outlook 2000 clients connecting
to an Exchange
>>> 2003 Server. At the time of implementation, we paid
for the Exchange
>>> license, the CALs to allow the clients to connect to
the server, and the
>>> licenses for the client software itself.
>>>
>>> We are looking to migrate to Exchange 2007, but do
not plan to upgrade
>>> our clients right away, remaining with Outlook 2000
on our desktops for
>>> now. I am being told that we need to pay for the
Exchange 2007 license
>>> (makes sense), the CALs to allow the clients to
connect to the new
>>> server (makes sense), AND for 500 licenses for
Outlook 2007, even though
>>> we don't plan to use it (makes no sense, to me at
least).
>>>
>>> Can someone tell me if this is also your
understanding? If you upgrade
>>> your server, you are forced to pay for the client
upgrade, even if you
>>> don't plan to use it? If so, would it be the same if
we were running
>>> Outlook 2003 currently?
>>>
>>> Thanks for any input.
>>
>
>
Top
From:
Bharat Suneja [MVP] <bharat@nospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 Max Send/Receive issues
Date:
10/05/2007
11:42:31
Exchange Server 2007: Setting Message Size Limits
http://exchangepedia.com/blog/2007/09/exchange-server-2007-setting-message_10.html
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"Jimmy" wrote in message
news:fe5o2t$2eho$1@energise.enta.net...
> Hi,
>
> I have an issue with a user's mailbox rejecting emails
with "large"
> attachements in Exchange 2007 e.g Msg Size greater than
allowed by Remote
> Host.
>
> Using both the Exchange management console and the
powershell, I have
> adjusted the mailbox limits to allow messages upto
100mb, however the
> server is still rejecting large mail.
>
> Using the "get-transportconfig" CMDlet both Max Receive
and Max Send are
> set to 100mb
> get-receiveconnector | list shows max message size of
100mb
> get-transportserver | list
>
> For user limits:
> get-mailbox -identity "user" | list shows the correct
size for this user
> eg 100mb
>
> Within the management console - server config - Hub
transport I have no
> options to change the receive connector as I am not
running sp1 beta.
> Message size restrictions have been set within
recipient configuration.
>
> I must be missing something somewhere but I am unable
to see any other
> options within the management console to change. I am
not sure if this
> could be caused by a group mailbox setting pehaps?
>
> Any assistance would be appreciated.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 pagefile placement
Date:
10/04/2007
18:29:36
It depends. Because the recommendation is that the
pagefile be equal to
the amount of RAM in the system, and you can put a lot of
RAM in the system,
you may want to or even need to dedicate a drive to it.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"gltaylor" wrote in message
news:OjSXp8sBIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Looking for some real world expereince on this
question. Currently in our
> Exchange 2003 systems, we use a RAID 1 drive that
contains the Exchange
> binariy files and holds the page file so that it is off
of the C drive and
> is not on the drive used by the databases/transaction
logs.
>
> Does anyone know, or seen any recommedations, on
placement of the page
> file and binary files for Exchange 2007? What are those
of your currently
> running 2007 doing for this? Thanks.
>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: ExchWeb security keeps getting reset
Date:
10/04/2007
16:43:13
On Thu,
04 Oct 2007 09:44:16
-0700, joe.bissot@gmail.com wrote:
>I am having a problem with OWA located on the Exchange
server. The
>ExchWeb virtual directory keeps reseting to anonymous
access only,
>when I need to have integrated Windows authentication
available. When
>I use the IIS manager to change the security setting
everything works
>for a few minutes until something sets it back to
anonymous only. Any
>suggestions?
Be design.
The DS2MB process overwrites that.
Make the change in ESM instead.
Top
From:
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Export/Importing Contacts
Date:
10/05/2007
11:10:23
DG wrote:
> All of my top management have PDA's that sync outlook
via Microsoft
> Push. It works great. Now I want to get the company
contacts (ie all
> employees home and cell phones as well as picture) to
their PDA's.
>
> Here is what I did to accomplish this:
>
> I had our secretary enter all the employee's
information (home phone,
> cell phone, work phone and picture) into a seperate
> CompanyContacts.pst.
Why not a public contacts folder so everyone can see the
live/shared data in
Outlook?
> I then exported it to a file
Why? You already had in a PST, you said.....
> and imported it
> into My contacts in outlook.
Don't import in Outlook. Copy/paste instead.
> Within minutes my PDA was updated. Pictures and all.
(It seems that I have
> to use PST format to get the
> pictures to correctly export (is that correct?)).
No.....
>
> The problem is that some managers like their contacts
to be Last
> name First and others like First Name Last.
Do you mean the File As field? That's a per-item thing.
The default is Last,
First, and that makes the most sense to most people. If
you mean the display
order, that's somethng they each need to set in their own
Outlook or PDA.
>
> Is there a way in the Import or Export to tell how to
display the
> name? I thought that when I imported if my outlook
options was set
> to First Name Last then all the imports would be that
way. However,
> they all came in Last Name, First.
>
> Any help would be great?
>
> DG
The problem with what you're doing is that your
management now has a static
copy of data that your company may wish to change over
time. This won't be a
very scalable or supportable method going forward. If
they want shared data,
use a public contacts folder, and to get that into their
PDAs, look into
www.diditbetter.com for Add2Exchange.
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Failing Public Folder Replication
Date:
10/03/2007
20:13:23
Who said it's unresolvable? I gave you a resolution.
Recreate the folders.
The OAB will regenrate on the next schedule, and
everyone's Outlook will
repopulate their free/busy pretty quickly.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"ZuG" wrote in message
news:1191420823.630139.311330@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks for the link.
>
> I'm still not convinced this is unsolveable. If I can
get SBS talking
> to Standard again by fixing the mail loop error, I'm
pretty confident
> that I won't lose the public folders. Any suggestions
how I might
> start troubleshooting that process?
>
> On Oct 2,
4:22 pm, "Ed Crowley
[MVP]" wrote:
>> The best way to handle this at this point is to
recreate the system
>> public
>> folders. See
>>
this:http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;822444
>>
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> "ZuG" wrote in message
>>
>>
news:1191355655.660924.75280@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > We're migrating our exchange server off of SBS 2003
(SBS) to Windows
>> > Server Standard 2003 (Standard) using the
instructions at
>>
>http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Migrating-Small-Business-Server-2....
>>
>> > I got all the mailboxes transferred and the IP
address of the exchange
>> > changed to what the SBS was. Unfortunately, I missed
replicating the
>> > public folders (OAB, OAL, Schedule+, etc) when I did
this migration.
>>
>> > Once I unplugged the network on SBS, users started
getting errors that
>> > indicated the OAB was missing. I looked at the
public folders on
>> > Standard, and sure enough they weren't there. I set
them to replicate
>> > and waited, but replication simply wasn't occuring.
I followed the
>> > directions at
>>
>http://www.msexchange.org/articles/Public-Folder-Replication-Troubles...
>> > and the message logs showed the SBS messages to
Standard were being
>> > queued and never delivered. The SBS message queue to
Standard said
>> > "Unable to deliver the message because the
destination address was
>> > misconfigured as a mail loop."
>>
>> > Googling this came back with some information about
FQDN issues. I
>> > checked the FQDN of the SMTP virtual servers and
they are correct. I
>> > have no idea where to go from here. Better yet, SBS
has started
>> > warning that there are multiple sbs servers on the
domain because i
>> > transferred all the master roles and it's shutting
itself down every
>> > couple of hours.
>>
>> > What on earth can I do to get this resolved?
>
>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Fav Icon
Date:
10/04/2007
16:45:52
On Thu,
4 Oct 2007 10:31:18
-0600, "Bad Beagle"
wrote:
>Can someone tell me where to copy a fav icon file to in
OWA 2003?
>Everything I read tells me to copy it to the root
directory. This doesn't
>seem to work because of the redirection. Any ideas?
>
Root directory of what?
I would think more likely :
C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\exchweb\img
or your equivalent.
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global address list edit
Date:
10/05/2007
21:23:06
"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
>On
Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:36:30
-0400, "Cactus Johnson"
> wrote:
>
>>There is really no way to edit the GAL? It's just an
ldap query..
>>
>The GAL doesn't exist as its own entity. It's a function
of AD. Change
>the display name in AD and you change the GAL.
>If you know all about ldap then get on with it. Quickest
would
>actually to use CSVDE to haul everything out, use excel
to edit it and
>then haul it all back in again.
CSVDE cannot be used to change anything. LDIFDE can do
that.
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global address list edit
Date:
10/05/2007
15:34:35
The GAL is the GAL. If you want to follow the article and
do another
GAL then you can use an attribute to filter out users.
I'm fairly sure
(no 2003 image up and running at the moment) that like
with Rcipient
Policies, you can't reliably use OUs and would need to
select an
attribute on the security principal (user/contact etc.)
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global address list edit
Date:
10/05/2007
15:31:38
Sounds like a plan if you've got the support calls
available in your
contract/plan.
When you talk to them don't focus on the users or
anything like that.
Stay on the permissions and how best you will manage who
gets what
view, and in what client.
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global address list edit
Date:
10/05/2007
15:05:17
I strongly urge you not to create a new GAL. It's a
support nightmare.
The stats that Microsoft PSS produced some years ago made
a few people
go pale, really.
There are just so many ways to change the information in
AD. All you
need to do is to change the display name.
And that article isn't even the answer to the question
you asked.
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global address list edit
Date:
10/05/2007
14:45:25
On
Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:36:30
-0400, "Cactus Johnson"
wrote:
>There is really no way to edit the GAL? It's just an
ldap query..
>
The GAL doesn't exist as its own entity. It's a function
of AD. Change
the display name in AD and you change the GAL.
If you know all about ldap then get on with it. Quickest
would
actually to use CSVDE to haul everything out, use excel
to edit it and
then haul it all back in again.
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global address list edit
Date:
10/05/2007
14:13:11
On
Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:53:43
-0400, "Cactus Johnson"
wrote:
>How do I edit the Global address list to only include
users with a specific
>domain sufix like:
>
>users@mail.com?
>
>With out including users from another mail domain...
>
>Thanks,
>
>Cactus
>
You can't edit the GAL to do that. There is such a thing
as an
"Address List" which can be shown as a separate folder
under the GAL.
It all depends on what you want to do and more
importantly why.
Top
From:
Lee Derbyshire [MVP] <email a@t leederbyshire d.0.t c.0.m>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global Task List
Date:
10/03/2007
17:47:41
"Hayden" wrote in message
news:%238IaWsgBIHA.4496@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Hi There,
>
> Is there a good way to have one task list that can be
shared by a group of
> people? Currently I have a business that uses outlook
to run their whole
> business using shared calendars etc. A shared task list
would be great.
>
> Is Microsoft Dynamics worth a look?
>
> Thanks,
> Hayden
How about a Public Folder containing Task items.
Never seen Dynamics.
Lee.
--
_______________________________________
Outlook Web Access for PDA, OWA For WAP:
www.leederbyshire.com
________________________________________
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Hide Distribution List Members
Date:
10/04/2007
07:01:05
You may need to rebuild the OAL/OAB
Oliver
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: How can I achieve this?
Date:
10/04/2007
12:14:55
On Thu,
4 Oct 2007 09:36:00
-0700, John
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>We have two forests with two-way trust.
Forest A is w2k and
has exchange
>server, forest B on the other hand is w2k3 and has no
exchange. I would like
>to enable users from forest B to use the mail server in
A. Can anyone help me
>with this?
>
>thanks a lot.
There are a few articles knocking about but this:
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Understanding-External-Associated-Account-Windows-Server-2003-Exchange-2003.html
gets good hits and ratings.
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: How to change default recipient policy so multiple SMTP addresses are
generated for each user?
Date:
10/03/2007
13:57:41
On
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:49:40
+0200, "Thierry Frache"
wrote:
>see ya copy-paste-man
awwwwww. . Does Mommy know you are on the Internet all
the time
asking questions about those big scary Exchange servers?
>
>"Andy David {MVP}" a écrit dans le
>message de news:
c9o7g3hbc9ivmbnmmdjuicvea5marnqqgd@4ax.com...
>> On
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:31:06
+0200, "Thierry Frache"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I'll do that man. Thanks for the time you spent for
replying. I guess
>>>you're
>>>a very busy man.
>>
>> How sad for you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>"Andy David {MVP}" a écrit dans le
>>>message de news:
cfg7g3lb912f4cs25mduj645qkaf2amrb6@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007
17:49:22
+0200, "Thierry Frache"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>The MVP Community got a bot for answering on the
Newsgroups!
>>>>
>>>> Feel free to post anytime you want.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Andy David {MVP}" a écrit dans
>>>>>le
>>>>>message de news:
drc7g3dn6utk9bn57cfebf0jjtiidd8go6@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2007
08:18:29
-0700, Robert Gordon
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm completely blanking on how to do this, but I
know it's very
>>>>>>>doable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I want to modify the default template that
Exchange uses, so that when
>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>create new users in Exchange it generates not only
the default
>>>>>>>userlogon@domain.com SMTP address, but
additionally a
>>>>>>>FirstName.LastName@domain.com SMTP address, or a
>>>>>>>LastName.FirstName@domain com address, etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/822447
>>>>>> "How to Modify an SMTP E-Mail Address by Using
Recipient Policies"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/285136
>>>>>> "How to customize the SMTP e-mail address
generators through recipient
>>>>>> policies"
>>>>>
>>>
>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: How to change default recipient policy so multiple SMTP addresses are
generated for each user?
Date:
10/03/2007
11:23:42
On
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:49:22
+0200, "Thierry Frache"
wrote:
>The MVP Community got a bot for answering on the
Newsgroups!
Feel free to post anytime you want.
>
>"Andy David {MVP}" a écrit dans le
>message de news:
drc7g3dn6utk9bn57cfebf0jjtiidd8go6@4ax.com...
>> On
Wed, 03 Oct 2007
08:18:29
-0700, Robert Gordon
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I'm completely blanking on how to do this, but I know
it's very doable.
>>>
>>>I want to modify the default template that Exchange
uses, so that when I
>>>create new users in Exchange it generates not only the
default
>>>userlogon@domain.com SMTP address, but additionally a
>>>FirstName.LastName@domain.com SMTP address, or a
>>>LastName.FirstName@domain com address, etc.
>>>
>>>Thanks.
>>
>>
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/822447
>> "How to Modify an SMTP E-Mail Address by Using
Recipient Policies"
>>
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/285136
>> "How to customize the SMTP e-mail address generators
through recipient
>> policies"
>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: How to change default recipient policy so multiple SMTP addresses are
generated for each user?
Date:
10/03/2007
10:22:17
On
Wed, 03 Oct 2007
08:18:29
-0700, Robert Gordon
wrote:
>I'm completely blanking on how to do this, but I know
it's very doable.
>
>I want to modify the default template that Exchange
uses, so that when I
>create new users in Exchange it generates not only the
default
>userlogon@domain.com SMTP address, but additionally a
>FirstName.LastName@domain.com SMTP address, or a
>LastName.FirstName@domain com address, etc.
>
>Thanks.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/822447
"How to Modify an SMTP E-Mail Address by Using Recipient
Policies"
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/285136
"How to customize the SMTP e-mail address generators
through recipient
policies"
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: How to change neame format in Exch. 2003
Date:
10/05/2007
14:16:18
That's just the display name. Change that to display it
the other ay
around. It's one of those things that you needed to do up
front rather
than after the fact.
Just wondering if you can do a mass change with
admodify.net......
Top
From:
Neil Hobson [MVP] <neil.hobson@nospam.silversands.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: How to unlock message stuck in outbox (client-side)?
Date:
10/04/2007
08:55:27
What's the error displayed when attempting to delete it?
Can you delete via OWA?
--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP
http://www.msexchange.org/Neil_Hobson/
http://www.msexchangeblog.com
"OxygeN" wrote in message
news:uXUdcqnBIHA.2268@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hello there...
>
> I got a client (OL2000) which has a message stuck in
the outbox-queue...
> How may I remove it?
>
> Thanks...
>
Top
