From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Implement FE server
Date:
10/03/2007
20:16:02
I'm not telling you that you shouldn't use a front-end
server, just that ISA
is far better suited for the DMZ, and since you have just
one back-end
server, a front-end server doesn't offer you much
utility.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
wrote in message
news:1191419614.664973.140650@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 2,
4:27 pm, "Ed Crowley
[MVP]" wrote:
>> If you have just one back-end server, then you'd be
better off installing
>> an
>> ISA server in the DMZ and using it to publish OWA and
relay SMTP to the
>> back-end. Front-end servers do not belong in a DMZ.
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:1191348894.159356.319920@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>
>
> Hello Ed,
>
> Do you mean I should use ISA in DMZ and use the ISA to
route the OWA
> request from internet to our BE and I should not use a
FE in our
> situation ?
>
> I do not know ISA very much, what's the advantage of
this comparing to
> a FE in DMZ ?
>
> Regards,
> Eddie
>
>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Install Exchange 2003 after AD upgraded for Exchange 2007 ?
Date:
10/03/2007
11:22:18
On
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:09:00
-0700, Tadwick
wrote:
>Thanks, Andy
>
>What if I don't care about the existing Exchange 2007
server (it's a test
>box and I can remove it). Will Exchange 2003 still not
install?
If you have done the 2007 schema updates, you wont be
able to install
a fresh 2003 org. You can only install additional 2003
servers into an
2003 exch org that eixsted prior to running the 2007
schema updates.
>
>Tad
>
>"Andy David {MVP}" wrote:
>
>> On
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:04:02
-0700, Tadwick
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I have a test environment where I installed Exchange
2007 and, in doing so,
>> >upgraded my domain controller and AD to make it
compatible with Exchange 2007.
>> >
>> >Can I create a new Exchange 2003 server once the AD
has been upgraded?
>>
>>
>> Only if you installed Exchange 2007 into an existing
2003 org.
>>
>>
>> >
>> >Thanks, Tad
>>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Install Exchange 2003 after AD upgraded for Exchange 2007 ?
Date:
10/03/2007
10:15:49
On
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:04:02
-0700, Tadwick
wrote:
>I have a test environment where I installed Exchange
2007 and, in doing so,
>upgraded my domain controller and AD to make it
compatible with Exchange 2007.
>
>Can I create a new Exchange 2003 server once the AD has
been upgraded?
Only if you installed Exchange 2007 into an existing 2003
org.
>
>Thanks, Tad
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Looking for a Registry value
Date:
10/05/2007
20:51:06
TLMPLHou66 wrote:
>Looking for a Registry value for the mailbox store
property "Do Not Mount
>this store at start-up"
>Any idea where this is located in the registry?
It's in the AD, not the registry.
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Mailbox Cleanup Agent
Date:
10/04/2007
05:51:33
On Thu,
04 Oct 2007 09:15:22
-0000, BZP wrote:
>Hello,
>
>In Exchange Server 5.5, there was a service Calleds
Mailbox Cleanup
>Agent. In Exchange 2003, this component depends of which
service ?
>SA ? IS ? other ?
SA
>How can I customize this component (sharper thant with
GUI).
in 2003? Cant really.
>
>Thanks.
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Mailbox cleanup message
Date:
10/04/2007
17:59:06
That's not a message, that's a dialog box.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Janaka Sampath" wrote in message
news:%23vnqd4nBIHA.5752@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
> "Oliver Moazzezi [MVP]" wrote in message
> news:%23jbxCMnBIHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Copy and paste the message here Janaka
>
> Oliver
>
>
>
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Mailbox cleanup message
Date:
10/04/2007
05:40:39
Copy and paste the
message here Janaka
Oliver
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Mailbox cleanup message
Date:
10/03/2007
23:25:42
Post the message here so we know what you're talking
about. Also tell us
what version of Exchange you're asking about.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Janaka Sampath" wrote in message
news:%23UQy3sjBIHA.5328@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I have certain users where they have frequently comeup
with mailbox cleanup
>message when one mail receive to theire mailboxes. This
message has no
>attachement or not exeeding capacity limits configured.
Also all users
>mails are downloading to theire own pst files. This
happens only by this
>particular mail and it is like daily news alert with
some verses / rhyms.
>
> how can I solve this issue?
>
> Thank you
> Janaka Sampath
>
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: mailbox migration
Date:
10/03/2007
23:19:02
Between the two directories.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"tin" wrote in message
news:OQ$vAVfBIHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Where would i setup the "directory synchronism
mechanism " ? individual
> account?
>
>
> "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote in message
> news:uxrP9NX%23HHA.4784@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> If you're maintaining both organizations, then you add
one in both, in
>> the new org for all users with whom the migrated user
communicates, and
>> in the old org for the user you migrated.
>>
>> In the old org, everyone replying to old messages from
the migrated users
>> will get bounces. In addition, their Outlook contacts
and personal
>> address book entries for the migrated user will be
wrong. Plus their
>> nicknames (as you've discovered) will be wrong.
>>
>> In the new organization, the migrated user won't be
able to reply to
>> messages from any of the users in the old
organization, and all his
>> contacts and PAB entries will be wrong, in addtion to
the nicknames.
>>
>> If you're maintaining two organizations, then you
ought to add the X.500
>> addressing to your directory synchronism mechanism and
ensure that these
>> addresses are maintained when users are migrated
between them.
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> "tin" wrote in message
>> news:ueTvCjV%23HHA.5404@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> Ed, Thanks for your reply
>>>
>>> Do I create this is my new Org or old Org? The
migrated account has been
>>> deleted already. Should I create a contact with for
this migrated
>>> account with x500 address?
>>>
>>> "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote in message
>>> news:e40weSV%23HHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> The old cached addresses are X.500-type addresses,
not X.400. The best
>>>> way to deal with this issue is to create a New Other
address for the
>>>> recipient of type X500 (no dot) containing the
address in the format
>>>> /O=Org/OU=Site/CN=Recipients/CN=DirectoryName. The
NDR should have the
>>>> address you need to add to the recipient.
>>>> --
>>>> Ed Crowley
>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>>>
>>>> "tin" wrote in message
>>>> news:OpR81DV%23HHA.4432@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Hello, I have a situation after I migrated a test
mailbox from one
>>>>> Exchange Org. to another. The problem is that
people from the old
>>>>> Exchange is using their Cached names (x400 address)
in Outlook and so
>>>>> they are not able to communicate with the migrated
account (smtp
>>>>> address is fine). I know you can remove the cached
names by deleting
>>>>> the entry from .n2k file manually but isn't there a
better way to
>>>>> address this issue? Is there a work around on
Exchange? or Is there a
>>>>> way to export the .n2k file to csv and import it
back? If the latter
>>>>> is possible then I can write script to delete the
entry from csv and
>>>>> re-import it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Mailbox Store Changes Made After Last Backup - How to Restore?
Date:
10/04/2007
04:35:43
An attempt to write
> to the file "D:\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA\VIP.edb" at offset
238034944
> (0x000000000e302000) for 1048576 (0x00100000) bytes
failed after 0
> seconds with system error 112 (0x00000070): "There is
not enough space
> on the disk. ". The write operation will fail with
error -1808
You have run out of space on your disk. This is why you
can't mount. Whether
you've corrupted the databases or not is another
question, easily answered
by running 'eseutul /mh' against them.
Oliver
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Mailbox Store Changes Made After Last Backup - How to Restore?
Date:
10/03/2007
23:26:22
I wouldn't do that. If I were you, I'd open a support
ticket with Microsoft
PSS.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"trading_jacks" wrote in message
news:1191464282.135623.175030@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>I was in the process of moving mailboxes to newly
created mailbox
> stores (same storage group) and the move failed and now
all stores
> will not mount.
>
> I want to do a restore from last nights backup, but it
doesn't contain
> the info about the additional stores. Should I deleted
the new
> stores? Is that info in the transaction logs? Keep or
remove the
> logs?
>
> Any other useful information will be appreciated!
>
> And in case you didn't guess, this is way up there on
the urgency
> scale! Thanks!
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Message tracking log file
Date:
10/03/2007
23:27:46
Please share exactly what settings you made.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"dave" wrote in message
news:u$PJXuhBIHA.912@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> So, I have enabled message tracking on my 2003 Exchange
server but it is
> not generating the tracking log---any thoughts? Message
tracking works on
> one of our servers in a different domain that's part of
our forest but not
> in my domain.
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Missing Administrative Groups and other objects in ESM
Date:
10/04/2007
18:33:32
Call Microsoft PSS.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"PFCU" wrote in message
news:CFA027FB-11FC-4BB4-96D1-B187A10C0C06@microsoft.com...
> Hello,
>
> I am running Exchange 2003 SP2. I was working with the
delegation wizard
> trying to delete an empty admin group. I am not sure
what I did but I now
> cannot see any Admin groups in ESM.
>
> In ADSIEDIT there are no entries below the organization
name. Is there any
> way to recover the lost information?
>
> The orginal error I was getting when trying to delete
the emty admin group
> was C1034a3c - admin group contains delegated
administrative roles.
>
> Thanks
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: moving mailboxes from 2003 server to another 2003 server
Date:
10/04/2007
18:37:20
You can probably open four MMCs and run mailbox moves on
all of them, if
you're careful to keep things separate and can manage
them all, and you'll
probably see nearly four times the throughput. How big is
the mailbox
store? If it's as huge as your numbers suggest (770GB?!)
then you ought to
be sure that you have enough servers and mailbox stores.
That's a awful lot
of data to back up in one night.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Jef" wrote in message
news:%23ipI1wrBIHA.4584@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> What is the best way to move mailboxes from one 2003
server to another
> 2003 server. We want to keep the old server as a
frontend server and move
> the mailboxes to the new server. We have about 1100
mailboxes and they
> average about 700mb in size. We have been thinking
about just using the
> Move Mailbox wizard but this will take forever. What is
the best way to
> accomplish this task?
>
> Thanks for your help
>
>
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: MSExchangeES - Error - Event ID 5
Date:
10/05/2007
21:00:00
RAJ wrote:
>How can I verify if the Exchange 2003 server is running
5.5 event scripts?
Why not just stop and disable the service?
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Multiple Address Lists (more details needed)
Date:
10/04/2007
16:51:58
Ensure she is in the domain users group
And ensure you've removed any groups you've added with
DENY perms.
Oliver
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Multiple Address Lists (more details needed)
Date:
10/04/2007
04:48:40
Hi,
Is it just OWA you're having the issue with?
OWA searching for users in the address book works
differently.
To fix your OWA issues (if it is indeed just OWA that has
the issue here,
confirm)
1. Ensure the students and the teachers are in seperate
OU's
2. Fire up ADSIEdit and look for the MSExchQueryBaseDN,
you need to set this
to be the OU that the users reside in.
So for Teachers, set it to their home OU, and for
students to their
respective OU.
What this attribute does is only allow OWA to search for
mail enabled
objects in the OU that is referenced for the user that is
logged in when
MSExchQueryBaseDN is set.
Now let me know if you have GAL issues when using
Outlook. If you do reply
back and also give me your security settings you've
applied to the GALs you
have so far created.
Oliver
"Pretender" wrote in message
news:89E46E76-0E03-46FE-888B-9F3D2AA5DCD4@microsoft.com...
> OK - I read it all and thought I performed all the
tasks, but the test
> users
> I created can see the whole organization's GAL (tested
with OWA), and I
> can
> see the test accounts in the organization's GAL. The
upside is that email
> easily flows between the two. The downside is that I
wanted separate GALs.
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Multiple Address Lists (more details needed)
Date:
10/03/2007
17:28:39
Hi,
First stop:
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Shared_Hosting_Exchange_2003_Part1.html
Once you've read the above, if there's anymore questions
you have, let me
know.
Oliver
"Pretender" wrote in message
news:A9A6CA5D-5927-46B8-8DE6-3EFE3506234A@microsoft.com...
> Like the other admin who has to manage two domain names
in the same
> organization, I have a school environment in which all
staff have email
> but
> only selected students who participate in a virtual
academy. I would like
> to
> create their mailboxes on Exch2K3 using their separate
domain name and
> keep
> their GAL completely separate from the staff GAL.
>
> The other similar post here requires knowledge that I
do not have. I need
> some assistance (whitepapers, even) in how to install
Exchange on this
> student-server (same organization or not?) and how to
segragate the two
> GAL.
> This is new territory for me.
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: MX Record question..
Date:
10/03/2007
20:25:06
"jim" wrote:
>Also, they claim that we're the only company this is
happening with.
There's no reason to doubt that, but they don't know that
for a fact.
All that means is that you're the only one that noticed
the problem
and brought it to their attention.
>As
>well, they're definitely the only company WE'RE having
this issue with. The
>only change in this process was the Edge server. The
problem started the
>day we deployed it and the messages are queuing on that
one Edge server.
Once you verify that the DNS query's returning the corrct
set of MX
and A records, engage MS PSS and report the problem.
I can tell you that I have this happen pretty regularly
(but not
often) on non-Windows machines. It's not peculiar to
Exchange. Of
course those machines report the results of the DNS
queries in the
SMTP logs so finding the problem is a lot easier. :-)
>What i don't get is why Exchange isn't even attempting
to contact the lower
>cost address even after the "bad" address is failing.
What you don't know is the result of the DNS query.
You're assuming
that the server got both MX records in the answer and
that may not be
the case. Verify that bit of information before spending
a lot of time
looking for the problem elsewhere.
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Need Help with Setting Up Public Folder
Date:
10/04/2007
18:38:46
I'm pretty sure that OWA doesn't support this.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"razor" wrote in message
news:D09BF5D0-93CB-433C-8228-9C454141CB76@microsoft.com...
> Hello--
>
> I've set up many public folders, but we have a client
that wants a public
> folder (not a default public folder) where multiple
users can access it
> via
> their web browsers and be able to reply to the messages
with the same
> email
> address showing 'sent from' as the email address
assigned to the public
> folder.
>
> As you know, if I set up a usual public folder, email
message arrive as
> posts, so I tried to set up an SMTP folder and every
time I try to go to
> the
> URL, after I enter in my credentials, my own personal
OWA account opens??
>
> Specs: All clients are running W XP Pro with IE6. The
server is running
> Exchange Server 2003 on a Windows Server 2003 platform.
>
> I completed the book for exam 70-284, but I don't
recall anything like
> this.
> Any help would be appreciated!
>
> sd
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: New account in AD but no mailboxes in ESM
Date:
10/04/2007
18:20:43
How, if it doesn't have an SMTP address?
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Mindaugas [MCSE]" wrote in message
news:u7UGYOrBIHA.2324@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Try to send e-mail to problematic account and then
check again.
>
> "behemoth" wrote in message
> news:47051a34$0$27383$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr...
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please help me with this problem :
>>
>> I have created an user account and select the option
to create an
>> exchange account.
>>
>> I log on to Windows with the new account but nothing
changes. In the
>> properties of the user account in ADUC, the lines STMP
= ... don't
>> appear.
>>
>> I have refreshed the RUS ... no changes.
>>
>> Note that when I log on with my new user account I can
add an other
>> exchange account to outlook but not the current
exchange account.
>>
>> Hervé -
>>
>
>
Top
From:
Neil Hobson [MVP] <neil.hobson@nospam.silversands.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: New account in AD but no mailboxes in ESM
Date:
10/04/2007
12:10:48
It does sound like a RUS problem. Is it pointing to a
valid DC and Exchange
server? Try restarting the System Attendant service.
Also, put "troubleshooting RUS" into google and you'll
get a ton of hits,
most notably the MS team blog series on this problem.
--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP
http://www.msexchange.org/Neil_Hobson/
http://www.msexchangeblog.com
"behemoth" wrote in message
news:47051a34$0$27383$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr...
> Hi,
>
> Please help me with this problem :
>
> I have created an user account and select the option to
create an exchange
> account.
>
> I log on to Windows with the new account but nothing
changes. In the
> properties of the user account in ADUC, the lines STMP
= ... don't appear.
>
> I have refreshed the RUS ... no changes.
>
> Note that when I log on with my new user account I can
add an other
> exchange account to outlook but not the current
exchange account.
>
> Hervé -
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Notifications exchange 2007
Date:
10/04/2007
18:15:25
Log on to the mailbox with Outlook, and select Tools >
Inbox Assistant.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Arantza" wrote in message
news:F41537F5-C87B-4EFD-B152-5525636C95E7@microsoft.com...
>
> first of all, thank you for your reply.
> Then, I'm not a paranoid. I just have some special
needs in one mailbox
> and
> I don't want the user to do anything in Outlook.
> I'm more interested in delivery receipts that in read
receipts so If the
> user doesn't aprove it , ok, no problem.
> Anyway, and after this little explanation, you talk
about Inbox assistant
> rules but I haven't found them.
> I have read abaut them in exchange 2003 but I have
exchange 2007.
> Can you tell me where can I find them???
> Thank you
> "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Send the message with delivery and read receipt
requested. If you're
>> paranoid, you can configure Outlook to do that with
every message you
>> send,
>> but good luck in managing all those receipts. (I often
wonder about
>> people
>> who do that.) The server will fire the delivery
receipt, but read
>> receipts
>> are controlled by Outlook and aren't guaranteed since
Outlook leaves it
>> up
>> to the recipient whether or not to send those (a
feature I applaud, by
>> the
>> way).
>>
>> You can configure a mailbox to reply to every message
it receives through
>> an
>> Inbox Assistant rule. If you keep the reply rule
simple, it will fire on
>> the server without Outlook having to be running.
Replies won't go to the
>> Internet, however, unless you allow automatic replies
to the Internet, a
>> practice that is strongly discouraged because
misconfigured settings can
>> cause mail loops that eat up the store.
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> "Arantza" wrote in message
>>
news:CE7B67B1-7C02-4B94-8202-26F3DCD02146@microsoft.com...
>> > Hi,
>> > I'd like to configure a mailbox that, when I send a
message to it, it
>> > sends
>> > me a notification that the message has been
delivered or read.
>> > I know I can do it in Outlook 2007 but I'd like to
do it in the server.
>> > Does anyone know if it's possible and how to
implement it?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance
>>
>>
>>
Top
