From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Mail Relay or what??
Date:
10/09/2007
20:04:46
Zuhair Al-Saleh wrote:
>in our exchange 2003 server (SP2) we have a strange
issue, that is we are
>having our exchange server sends emails or "spam" from
our server itself
>using the same domain mail account of the user. for
example: my mail account
>is (user@comany.com) and I'm recieving "spam" mails from
the same
>(user@comany.com)!!!
>
>what is the cause and the resolution of this problem? is
it a bug in
>exchange??
As Alexander points out, this is called "spoofing". You
can protect
yourself by publishing your list of servers authorized to
send email
on behalpf of your domain in SPF format. Then enable
SenderID checking
on your inflow server(s). This won't prevent spam, but it
will help
you (and others) with the spooing.
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Alexander Zammit [MVP] <alex@respond_to_group>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Mail Relay or what??
Date:
10/09/2007
02:35:50
This is common spammers trick. Most likely the email is
not originating from
your server. The spammer is simply spoofing the sender
address.
To make sure open the email in outlook and check the MIME
headers from View
| Options. Make a close look at the Received headers.
These will show you
the IPs of the hosts through which the email flowed.
One way to block these emails would be to blacklist your
own domain at the
anti-spam software. However you should only do this if
you know that no
legitimate email could enter your organization over an
anonymous connection
from your domain in this manner.
--
Alexander Zammit
WinDeveloper Software
IMF Tune - Unleash the Full Intelligent Message Filter
Power
http://www.windeveloper.com/imftune/
"Zuhair Al-Saleh" wrote in
message
news:86D92D54-F3C8-4104-B3D4-9BD178C37AAB@microsoft.com...
> in our exchange 2003 server (SP2) we have a strange
issue, that is we are
> having our exchange server sends emails or "spam" from
our server itself
> using the same domain mail account of the user. for
example: my mail
> account
> is (user@comany.com) and I'm recieving "spam" mails
from the same
> (user@comany.com)!!!
>
> what is the cause and the resolution of this problem?
is it a bug in
> exchange??
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: mailbox create event 120x?
Date:
10/09/2007
11:52:26
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"HankC" wrote in message
news:1191947075.055367.75740@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>
> turning up logging on
>
> 'MSExchangeIS -> Mailbox -> General' to Medium
>
> reveals the 1204 event when creating a mailbox...
>
>
> HankC
>
> On Sep 20,
6:40 pm, "Ed Crowley
[MVP]"
> wrote:
>> Move the account from where to where? ADMT doesn't
move accounts, it
>> creates new ones and applies SID history. It's no
wonder you're seeing
>> what
>> you're seeing!
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> "HankC" wrote in message
>>
>>
news:1190320236.026124.59260@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 20, 1:11 pm, "Ed
Crowley [MVP]"
>> > wrote:
>> >> A mailbox creation doesn't really create a mailbox.
A mailbox
>> >> creation
>> >> puts
>> >> the necessary information into Active Directory,
but the mailbox
>> >> itself
>> >> doesn't really get created until it receives a
message and/or Outlook
>> >> or
>> >> OWA
>> >> first connects to it. I'm not aware of any mailbox
creation event.
>> >> If
>> >> there is one, I'm sure it could figure it out, but
I'll leave that
>> >> exercise
>> >> to you.
>> >> --
>>
>> > Thanks...
>>
>> > We use ADMT to move the account.
>>
>> > Perhaps there is a brief time period where user
access or an inbound
>> > pice of mail creates a 'new', empty mailbox?
>>
>> > The new, empty mailboxes always appear in the
server's first database
>> > (which is empty of any other user mailboxes, hence
the new ones are
>> > easy to spot) and receives new mail.
>>
>> > The old mailbox becomes orphaned, and we have to
merge the two.
>>
>> > It's as if the exchange server is aware that mailbox
is disconnected
>> > from the account, but creates a new mailbox to store
the inbound mail
>> > and then connects the account to the new mailbox
when the acount is
>> > finished moving.
>>
>> > Interesting, this behavior just began recently with
the advent of some
>> > 2007 test servers in the environment.
>>
>> >HankC- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: mailbox storage limits not being applied
Date:
10/10/2007
14:39:08
I'm sorry, but those are not the complete event log
entries. Please click
on the little "copy" button in the message details dialog
and then paste
what you've copied into your message.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Paul" wrote in message
news:46C7CE65-8C83-4FD0-942D-878BE6A1BD2D@microsoft.com...
> Sorry,
>
> 2003 ent Sp2
>
> A rule synchronization error (1144) has occurred on
Mailbox Store "First
> Storage Group\Mailbox Store (EX01)".
>
> The mailbox folder is Top of Information Store\Inbox.
>
> The distinguished name of the owning mailbox is ---.
>
> There are 24 of 24 retries remaining.
>
> For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.
>
>
> Followed by:
>
> rule synchronization has successfully completed.
>
> The mailbox folder is Top of Information Store\Inbox on
database "First
> Storage Group\Mailbox Store (EX01)".
>
> The distinguished name of the owning mailbox is
/o=SPN/ou=First
> Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=Jones.
>
> For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.
>
> I receive one of these confirmation messages on the
hour allowing one
> person
> access back to their moved mailbox.
>
>
>
>
> "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> I don't see anywhere in the thread where we
established what version of
>> Exchange we're talking about. Also, please post the
entire event log
>> entry.
>>
>> Also, check out this article:
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/916694
>> Perhaps you have a strange registry entry that's
messing things up.
>>
>> Note that the message you're seeing shouldn't have
anything to do with
>> mailbox quotas, which I thought was the topic of this
thread.
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> "Paul" wrote in message
>>
news:93EFA0C5-5475-483B-9126-495823893A9E@microsoft.com...
>> > I've just re-read my post and I feel I should
clarify.
>> >
>> > If I move 10 mailboxes. The first one is accessible
after 2 hours and
>> > the
>> > reminding 9 mailboxes all become accessible one at a
time on the hour
>> > ie:
>> >
>> >
>> > Event id 1157 Time 10:00
>> > Rule synchronization has successfully completed.
>> > Jones can access his mailbox
>> >
>> > Event id 1157 Time 11:00
>> > Rule synchronization has successfully completed.
>> > Smith can access his mailbox
>> >
>> > Event id 1157 Time 12:00
>> > Rule synchronization has successfully completed.
>> > Brown can access his mailbox
>> >
>> > You get the picture. 10 Mailboxes takes all night.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Again, changes to limits can take up to two hours
to take effect, but
>> >> I
>> >> don't think that applies to when you're moving
mailboxes.
>> >> --
>> >> Ed Crowley
>> >> MVP - Exchange
>> >> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>> >>
>> >> "Paul" wrote in message
>> >>
news:A1FC4EB1-C2B3-4ECF-8FE7-0B32B952742F@microsoft.com...
>> >> > Correct the mailbox policy. There are no
overiding settings on the
>> >> > users
>> >> > settings.
>> >> >
>> >> > Things are not quite right with this server so I
have started moving
>> >> > the
>> >> > mailboxes onto another server but this too has
it's problems which
>> >> > could
>> >> > be
>> >> > releated in some way to the original policy
problem.
>> >> >
>> >> > When I try to move a mailbox I able to do so
providing I move one at
>> >> > a
>> >> > time,
>> >> > select more than one and it always fails. After I
move a mailbox it
>> >> > is
>> >> > not
>> >> > accessible for a couple of hours until the rules
have synchronized
>> >> > on
>> >> > the
>> >> > mail server that now holds the moved mailbox.
>> >> >
>> >> > What I have noticed is that after moving ten
mailboxes one at a time
>> >> > the
>> >> > mail server holding the mailboxes only gave
access to one mailbox at
>> >> > a
>> >> > time
>> >> > after synchronizing its rules. This was repeated
at the same time.
>> >> > So
>> >> > moving
>> >> > the tenth mailbox means that user has to wait 10
hours.
>> >> >
>> >> > This must be related in some way to the policy
rules not being
>> >> > enforced.
>> >> > "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Do you mean a mailbox store policy? If so, are
you sure that the
>> >> >> policy
>> >> >> is
>> >> >> applied to the store in question? What do you
see if you look at
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> properties of the user(s) in question? Might
they have settings
>> >> >> that
>> >> >> override the store policy or store settings?
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Ed Crowley
>> >> >> MVP - Exchange
>> >> >> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick
backups!"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Paul" wrote in message
>> >> >>
news:31C501D2-3059-4661-91BF-3B93174E616C@microsoft.com...
>> >> >> >I set these limits along time ago and I thought
they were working
>> >> >> >because I
>> >> >> > have had the odd support call saying "I can't
send email" which
>> >> >> > was
>> >> >> > down
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > the policy enforcing the limits. But now when
I look closer
>> >> >> > clearly
>> >> >> > this
>> >> >> > policy is no longer working and there is no
evidence in the event
>> >> >> > viewer
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > idicated there is a problem.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "Betelgeuse" wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> If you just set the limits, they typically
are not applied until
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> next
>> >> >> >> store maintenance period, which is usually in
the wee hours.
>> >> >> >> I don't know of any way to force them to
update immediately...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> "Paul" wrote in message
>> >> >> >>
news:7690BA4C-7E82-49EF-A429-579F678D616F@microsoft.com...
>> >> >> >> > hi,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I have a mailbox policy limiting the
mailbox size to:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > issue warning 50000
>> >> >> >> > prohibit send 55000.
>> >> >> >> > prohibit send and receive is left blank
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I have added an exchange mailbox store to
the policy. If I
>> >> >> >> > check
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> > limits
>> >> >> >> > tab on the property pages of the mailbox
store they are greyed
>> >> >> >> > out
>> >> >> >> > and
>> >> >> >> > showing the correct limits 50000, 55000.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > If I look at the mailboxes from inside ESM
I can see a few
>> >> >> >> > mailboxes
>> >> >> >> > showing mailbox sizes over 50000 the
largest being 100,968.
>> >> >> >> > This
>> >> >> >> > user
>> >> >> >> > is
>> >> >> >> > still able to send email. The AD account of
this user is set
>> >> >> >> > to
>> >> >> >> > use
>> >> >> >> > mailbox
>> >> >> >> > store defaults.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Any ideas much appreciated.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Paul
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: mailbox storage limits not being applied
Date:
10/09/2007
11:44:42
Do you mean a mailbox store policy? If so, are you sure
that the policy is
applied to the store in question? What do you see if you
look at the
properties of the user(s) in question? Might they have
settings that
override the store policy or store settings?
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Paul" wrote in message
news:31C501D2-3059-4661-91BF-3B93174E616C@microsoft.com...
>I set these limits along time ago and I thought they
were working because I
> have had the odd support call saying "I can't send
email" which was down
> to
> the policy enforcing the limits. But now when I look
closer clearly this
> policy is no longer working and there is no evidence in
the event viewer
> to
> idicated there is a problem.
>
> "Betelgeuse" wrote:
>
>> If you just set the limits, they typically are not
applied until the next
>> store maintenance period, which is usually in the wee
hours.
>> I don't know of any way to force them to update
immediately...
>>
>> "Paul" wrote in message
>>
news:7690BA4C-7E82-49EF-A429-579F678D616F@microsoft.com...
>> > hi,
>> >
>> > I have a mailbox policy limiting the mailbox size
to:
>> >
>> > issue warning 50000
>> > prohibit send 55000.
>> > prohibit send and receive is left blank
>> >
>> > I have added an exchange mailbox store to the
policy. If I check the
>> > limits
>> > tab on the property pages of the mailbox store they
are greyed out and
>> > showing the correct limits 50000, 55000.
>> >
>> > If I look at the mailboxes from inside ESM I can see
a few mailboxes
>> > showing mailbox sizes over 50000 the largest being
100,968. This user
>> > is
>> > still able to send email. The AD account of this
user is set to use
>> > mailbox
>> > store defaults.
>> >
>> > Any ideas much appreciated.
>> >
>> > Paul
>>
>>
>>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: managed folder policy set for deleted items/spam folder.. all emails from
9/8 get deleted! (crisis)
Date:
10/09/2007
12:24:03
Inline.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"markm75" wrote in message
news:1191941776.781148.192760@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
> The other day i set an email managed default folder
policy under
> deleted items, junk email and our spam folder.. i set
the policy to
> handle all mail content and set it to 30 days.. i then
set a policy in
> the policy tab and chose those folders.. actually..
yesterday i had
> only added "junk email" and "spam" in the policy..
those two are set
> to move emails into the deleted items folder..
>
> I set this policy using the shell script yesterday
afternoon, this
> morning.. all users reported only having emails from
around 9/8
> onward..
>
> There were a few subfolders from my mailbox with emails
dated around
> 9/8, in the deleted items, but nothing more.. I would
have thought if
> these policies blew up.. they would have only stuck
stuff in the
> deleted items folder and not made them go poof..
That would be hard to say without knowing exactly and
completely what you
configured.
> Even more odd.. our database size is 27gb.. this is
what it was
> yesterday, so its like nothing was "really" deleted.
The database never shrinks on its own. If mail was
deleted, then you'd have
white space in your mailbox store, but it wouldn't shrink
in size.
> Even the MS tech is unsure what has gone wrong.. I
assumed it was this
> retention policy, but i'm baffled...
What MS tech? If you have a support ticket open, then you
should pursue a
resolution there becuase you're paying them to do it and
they're able to
devote more real-time resources than we possibly can
here.
> Any help / thoughts out there? (in the meantime, a
restoration is
> underway from an ntbackup, thankfully)..
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Masquerade Domain
Date:
10/09/2007
11:41:03
Thanks for the nice words.
I've now begun in my tenth year of uncompensated peer
support for Exchange
Server (except for an annual small gift from Microsoft).
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Starbuck" wrote in message
news:dcglg3tu9qftk4jfu6jgvor7vv1iihich8@4ax.com...
> On
Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:05:18
-0700, "Ed Crowley [MVP]"
> wrote:
>
>>Masquerade domain won't fix your problem. What you need
to do is check
>>your
>>recipient policy to ensure that mailboxes have the
domain drharry.com, not
>>drharry.local, and have it apply the modified policy to
all mailboxes.
>>The
>>recipient policy need not be the same as the domain
name; the two are not
>>related, except that the mail domain in the recipient
policy takes the
>>domain name as its default when Exchange is installed.
>>--
>>Ed Crowley
>>MVP - Exchange
>>"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>
> Well now, that was easy!
> You are awesome my friend, I hope they pay you well.
:-)
> Thanks very much.
>
>
> *$
> ------------------------
> Rationalist
Top
From:
John Oliver, Jr. [MVP] <jcoliverjr@hotmail.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Masquerade Domain
Date:
10/08/2007
21:53:00
Starbuck,
There is no translation as you are referring too as Ed
stated in his
previous post. If you add the drharry.com to your Default
Recipient Policy
and then apply it, all users will SMTP addresses stamped
with @dharry.com.
If you did this properly then go the the Email Address
tab of a user in ADUC
and insure the @dharry.com is the Primary SMTP address.
In addition, SBS
has Internet and Mail Configuration Wizard that can be
accessed through the
Administrator Console that will do this automatically. I
would run this
again and make sure the @dharry.com is entered when you
get to the email
setup step.
--
John Oliver, Jr
MCSE, MCT, CCNA
Exchange MVP 2007
Microsoft Certified Partner
"Starbuck" wrote in message
news:mvdlg3hj4k3u1a5p14s0fhlumpn529kkf2@4ax.com...
> On
Mon, 08 Oct 2007
15:23:21
-0700, Starbuck
> wrote:
>
>>
>>I got roped into helping a friend setup email over the
weekend.
>>
>>He built an SBS server(admitedly, I don't know a lot
about SBS)
>>and he named the domain "drharry.local".
>>But on the outside, DNS knows him as "drharry.com". and
therein
>>kies the problem.
>>
>>From the outside, I send an email to user@drharry.com
and it bounces,
>>(ndr says it cannot relay).
>>
>>So I think I need to setup "masquerade domain" to
translate .com into
>>.local and back... Y/n?
>>If so, would I just go to advanced delivery and enter
"drharry.com" in
>>the masquerade domain section and that would take care
of it?
>>
>>If I'm wrong, then please set me straight...
>>
>>(Interesting, I can telnet directly to the ipaddress on
port 25 and
>>send messages in with helo, rcpt to:, etc...)
>>
>>As always, you guys are the best, and its much
appreciated.
>>
>>
>> *$
>> ------------------------
>> Rationalist
>
> Well, That didn't work.
>
> I need to translate mail on the outside (drharry.com)
to mail
> on the inside(drharry.local)...back and forth.
>
> I've always named my domains .com or .net so I've never
had
> this problem before.
>
>
> *$
> ------------------------
> Rationalist
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Max mailbox size exchange 2007
Date:
10/09/2007
21:05:39
It's higher than you'll want to buy.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"allen" wrote in message
news:E1D3C368-6E9F-4101-BCB9-A033C5AAF82D@microsoft.com...
> Still in the planning stage. Not sure how big I want to
go. Just wasn't
> sure what my maximum would be.
>
> "andy webb" wrote:
>
>> how big are your disks?
>>
>> "allen" wrote in message
>>
news:2D5358AB-310D-4B71-A9B0-4B571CA217FD@microsoft.com...
>> > Can someone tell me what the maximum mailbox size is
in exchange 2007
>> > enterprise edition
>>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Moderated Folders
Date:
10/09/2007
17:41:05
If you want to use Outlook to book resources, such as
conference rooms, in
meetings, then you're much better off using mailboxes
because Outlook is
designed to work with them as inviteees, whereas it isn't
desinged to work
that way with public folders.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"FloridaDiver" wrote in message
news:FA27DEC7-0D50-4778-B0CF-1FA6872B01F6@microsoft.com...
> Using Exchange 2003 and OL2003.
>
> If I created a public Calender and make it moderated
and assign it to
> someone.
> What would happen to this Calender should I leave the
company and my
> account
> is deleted? Would the calendar be deleted as well?
>
> Am I better off creating resouces by creating resouce
accounts?
> --
> Being Wet on the Net Can be an Electrifrying XPerience.
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Moderated Folders
Date:
10/09/2007
13:35:39
On
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:22:04
-0700, FloridaDiver
wrote:
>Using Exchange 2003 and OL2003.
>
>If I created a public Calender and make it moderated and
assign it to someone.
>What would happen to this Calender should I leave the
company and my account
>is deleted? Would the calendar be deleted as well?
>
>Am I better off creating resouces by creating resouce
accounts?
I think you're far better off with resource mailboxes. If
you do
create a PF and change the permissions on it you won't
find the PF
deleted if your account is deleted.
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Moving Mailboxes to exchange 2007, outlook 2003 clients not updating
correctly
Date:
10/10/2007
13:08:35
That should be sufficient for Outlook to update its
profile. How long after
the move are you waiting? Is it possible that you're
having Active
Directory replication delays?
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"verukins" wrote in message
news:1191987955.339915.198980@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> Hey Ed,
> Yes its one org, with one exch 2000 admin group.
>
> Moving the mailboxes by using the Exchange 2007
management GUI (ie
> right click, move mailbox etc)
>
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: MSExchangeES - Error - Event ID 5
Date:
10/05/2007
21:00:00
RAJ wrote:
>How can I verify if the Exchange 2003 server is running
5.5 event scripts?
Why not just stop and disable the service?
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Bharat Suneja [MVP] <bharat@nospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Multiple Exchange Organisations on one box
Date:
10/06/2007
05:19:45
Make sure the "Company" attribute is populated for all
recipients, and use
different Email Address Policies for different companies.
- You need to have an Accepted Domain for each domain -
this tells Exchange
it should receive inbound email for that domain.
- Email Address Policies generate email addresses for
recipients. You need
one for each company/set of users.
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"Steven Carr" wrote in message
news:47073671$0$8417$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk...
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Ok to remove 2003 exchange (2007 org).. via uninstall? Or am I missing
any steps?
Date:
10/05/2007
13:21:59
Not a bad start.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb288905.aspx
will give you
a little check list to make sure you capture everything.
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Outlook Anywhere Authentication
Date:
10/05/2007
05:47:27
On
Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:59:36
+0200, "Jan Matejka"
wrote:
>Hello,
>Exchange 2007 Ent, ISA 2004, Outlook AnyWhere published
acording this
>article:
http://www.isaserver.org/tutorials/2004pubowamobile.html
>
>Outlook AnyWhere works good, but users must use login in
this form:
>domain\user
>On IIS web site folder RPC is set basic authentication
and domain.
>
>How to configure Outlook Anywhere for users to write
only username and
>password without domain?
I dont think you can.
>
>Thank you
>
>JM
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: OWA login for trusted domain users help!!!
Date:
10/10/2007
13:04:50
For alias you entered the alias name of the mailbox
you're trying to open,
correct?
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"John" wrote in message
news:03A80BCC-FD96-434A-9B27-BDF23214A7D2@microsoft.com...
> Hi Ed,
>
> Thank you very much for your help.
>
>> Have you tried it? You're not logging in with that
account, you're just
>> specifying that mailbox in the URL and you would use
the domain A
>> credentials in the dialog box as I suggested.
>> --
>
> Yes. I did what you suggested. I used
https://servername/exchange/alias
> (
> trusting domain exchange server), Then I used the
trusted domain account
> as
> user1@a.com and password (UPN format) to log on. I
still got the "can not
> log on message and make sure that you type the right
domain and password "
>
> Any idea? Thank you again.
>
> "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Have you tried it? You're not logging in with that
account, you're just
>> specifying that mailbox in the URL and you would use
the domain A
>> credentials in the dialog box as I suggested.
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> "John" wrote in message
>>
news:B4CF173E-AA65-4B39-B0AC-C23EC487CC7D@microsoft.com...
>> > Hi Ed,
>> >
>> > Thanks for your help. Since domain _B _alias account
is disabled for
>> > seting
>> > up associated external mailbox according to
KB278888, I can not use
>> > this
>> > for
>> > log in.
>> >
>> > any other way to get around?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>> >
>> >> See if you can get in by specifying the target
mailbox in the URL,
>> >> such
>> >> as:
>> >> https://servername/exchange/domain_B_alias
>> >> and then using the domian A credentials in the
logon box.
>> >> --
>> >> Ed Crowley
>> >> MVP - Exchange
>> >> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>> >>
>> >> "John" wrote in message
>> >>
news:23A1A598-8ACC-4984-9134-FAAFFB68EA62@microsoft.com...
>> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >
>> >> > I set up two way external trust between these two
seperate domains A
>> >> > ?
>> >> > B(in
>> >> > two seperate forests and functional level in
windows 2000 native)
>> >> > and
>> >> > also
>> >> > I
>> >> > associate an exchange 2000 mailboxes according to
KB278888. Now, I
>> >> > try
>> >> > to
>> >> > test OWA for the users in domain A to access the
exchange servers in
>> >> > domain
>> >> > B, When I enter domain A\domain user to logon, I
get I can not log
>> >> > on.
>> >> > Is
>> >> > there any extra step I need to allow the trusted
user in domain A to
>> >> > access
>> >> > the assoicated mailbox in domain B?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you very much.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
Top
From:
Lee Derbyshire [MVP] <email a@t leederbyshire d.0.t c.0.m>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: prepopulate To: field in OWA??
Date:
10/09/2007
18:00:28
"steveb" wrote in message
news:B4E672F7-9079-43CD-A142-FF5393E8250A@microsoft.com...
>I can start OWA with a new email form with:
> /owa/?ae=Item?
>
> But, is there a way to populate the To: field?
>
> We have been using mailto: on our intranet, but out
shop employees use OWA
> for email, therefore Outlook is not configured on those
machines.
>
> If I could sill out the To: field, then my link will
just point to the OWA
> form for everyone.
>
> The issue is that we do not want anonymous emails to
this mail enabled
> public folder.
>
> My only other option is to create a SMTP web form that
requires a login to
> read LDAP and set the from address with. (this is
already built into OWA)
>
> Please advise.
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Steven
>
> http://www.glimasoutheast.org
Apparently, it can't be done in OWA 2007:
http://blogs.technet.com/kclemson/archive/2003/10/13/53822.aspx
Lee.
--
_______________________________________
Outlook Web Access for PDA, OWA For WAP:
www.leederbyshire.com
________________________________________
Top
From:
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: prepopulate To: field in OWA??
Date:
10/09/2007
09:39:56
steveb wrote:
> I can start OWA with a new email form with:
> /owa/?ae=Item?
>
> But, is there a way to populate the To: field?
>
> We have been using mailto: on our intranet, but out
shop employees
> use OWA for email, therefore Outlook is not configured
on those
> machines.
> If I could sill out the To: field, then my link will
just point to
> the OWA form for everyone.
> The issue is that we do not want anonymous emails to
this mail
> enabled public folder.
Not sure of the answer to your qiestion, but if this is
the sole reason,
can't you just specify that in the PF properties? Set
"anonymous" to "none"
in its permissions tab.
>
> My only other option is to create a SMTP web form that
requires a
> login to read LDAP and set the from address with. (this
is already
> built into OWA)
> Please advise.
>
>
>
> --
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Programmatically how to get version of Exchange server
Date:
10/10/2007
13:12:44
Don't know. I haven't used that attribute.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"shivaraj" wrote in message
news:1192021061.405390.9090@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 8,
10:19 pm, "Ed Crowley
[MVP]"
> wrote:
>> You can get this with WMI, although I'm not sure about
Exchange 2007
>> since
>> they've dropped so many APIs with that
>>
release.http://www.microsoft.com/technet/scriptcenter/topics/exchange/ex03_wm...
>>
>> You can also get this from AD, in the Configuration
namespace, in the
>> properties of the server object the attribute
serialNumber contains the
>> version and service pack for Exchange 2000 and 2003.
Again, I'm not sure
>> about Exchange 2007, but you can be pretty sure that
the only servers in
>> the
>> new administrative group are Exchange 2007 servers!
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> "shivaraj" wrote in message
>>
>>
news:1191833040.207166.326280@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> > I need a way to determine the version of Exchange
server
>> > ( Exchange 2000/ Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007 )
using win32 call.
>> > Any idea how do i get this? Any sample code
available to refer?
>>
>> > Regards,
>> > Shivaraj- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Thanks Ed Crowley. I will try to get it from WMI.
Meanwhile i have got
> one more question on MAPI. Please let me know if you
can answer for
> this as well. I am using "PR_NT_USER_NAME" to fetch
last logged on
> user. But i am getting all users with a question mark
in front!!!
> ( ex:
> ?GALAXY\shivaraj
> ?GALAXY\Administrator
> ?NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM ...etc )
> Any idea what this question mark stands for?
>
> Regards,
> Shivaraj
>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Public Folder replication pub.edb and pub.stm are very large on destination
server
Date:
10/10/2007
11:08:15
On
Wed, 10 Oct 2007
08:58:40
-0700, "J. Huber"
wrote:
>I am in the process of moving our Exchange 2003 data to
another server
>using the MS article 822931. We are using Exchange 2003
Standard SP2.
>
>Replicating the public folders to the new server is the
first step in the
>article. I have followed the instructions closely, but
the pub.edb and
>pub.stm files on the destination server are quite a bit
larger than those
>files on the source server. To compare, on the
destination server pub.edb
>is approx 11GB, and pub.stm is approx. 7GB. On the
source server pub.edb is
>approx 7GB, and pub.stm is 265MB (yes MB). I am having a
hard time
>understanding why there is such a discrepancy between
the two servers. Can
>anyone provide any insight to why this is happening and
is there any way to
>reduce the size on the destination server? Thanks in
advance for any
>replies.
>
>Jim
Public Folder replication is probably the same as a
mailbox move in
terms of promotion of the message into the edb file from
the stm.
(When moving a mailbox, all its properties are promoted
to rich format
( i.e. the edb file). So if you had a number of messages
sent from the
Internet to the pfs and they were contained in the stm,
it makes sense
that they have now been promoted to the edb file on the
destination
store.
Also note that moving items leaves behind the white space
in the
source store, so that can explain why its not 11GB
anymore.
I take it all the folders are now replicated?
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Random Email Bounces
Date:
10/05/2007
19:31:13
"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
wrote:
>Rich Matheisen [MVP] wrote:
>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
>> wrote:
>>
>> [ snip ]
>>
>>> Indeed. After many years I can now differentiate
between Queens
and
>>> Staten Island
accents, even :-D
>>
>> What about Lawn Guyland accents?
>
>North or South Fork?
>
>:-p
S'mattah. Can't tell Orient from Montauk?
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Random Email Bounces
Date:
10/05/2007
14:04:18
Rich Matheisen [MVP] wrote:
> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
> wrote:
>
> [ snip ]
>
>> Indeed. After many years I can now differentiate
between Queens
and
>> Staten Island
accents, even :-D
>
> What about Lawn Guyland accents?
North or South Fork?
:-p
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Redirect email to new email server
Date:
10/09/2007
12:16:30
That's a good idea, but it would be better to change the
applications that
send the mail to use an alias name, such as
exchange.company.com, and create
a CNAME entry that points that alias to the hostname of
the Exchange server.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Betelgeuse" wrote in message
news:egEMRSpCIHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>I dont think he can do that, as other apps are looking
to SErver1.
>
> You could install the SMTP service on server one, and
configure it to
> forward everything to your exchange server as a
[smarthost]....a bit rube
> goldberg but it may work....
>
>
> "Oliver Moazzezi [MVP]" wrote in message
> news:eLbhaApCIHA.5280@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> You could just add the IP of Server 1 (your retired
Exchange 2000 server)
>> to Server 2.
>>
>> Then just add the servers that will be relaying to the
IP relay allow
>> list on the SMTP virtual server/s of Server 2.
>>
>> Otherwise update all your inhouse databases to now
send mail to Server 2
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>>
>
>
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Redirect email to new email server
Date:
10/09/2007
11:18:59
You could just add the IP of Server 1 (your retired
Exchange 2000 server) to
Server 2.
Then just add the servers that will be relaying to the IP
relay allow list
on the SMTP virtual server/s of Server 2.
Otherwise update all your inhouse databases to now send
mail to Server 2
Oliver
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Removing Empty, but Replicated Public Folders
Date:
10/10/2007
13:53:27
Using Exchange 2003 System Manager, on each top-level
folder, change the
replicas to remove the Exchange 2007 server, and then
right-click the
folder, select All Tasks, Propagate Settings, and choose
to propagate the
replicas. You can also use PFDAVADMIN to do this, or
PFMIGRATE, but I don't
think either are any easier for you if you're talking
about ending up with a
simple structure.
Don't forget to remove the replicas of any of the
Exchange 2003 Schedule+
Free/Busy folders and the Offline Address Book folders.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Bill Hobson" wrote in message
news:OMY4Ci0CIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I am throwing in the towel on Exchange 2007 until a
ServicePack or 2 are
>out - it has crashed my Exchange 2003 system too many
times. I am trying,
>after removing all mailbox databases, to remove the
Public Folder database,
>which I am forced to remove before removing Exchange
2007. I am running the
>moveallreplicas.ps1 script and get this:
>
> [PS] D:\PROGRAM FILES\microsoft\exchange
> server\Scripts>moveallreplicas.ps1 -ser
> ver:"email2" -newserver:"email"
> WARNING: Object Public Folder Store has been corrupted
and it is in an
> inconsistent state. The following validation errors
have been encountered:
> WARNING: "PublicFolderStore(EMAIL)" is not valid for
Alias. Valid values
> are:
> Strings formed with characters from a to z (uppercase
or lowercase),
> digits
> from 0 to 9, !, #, $, %, ?
> One or
> more periods may be embedded in an alias, but each one
of them should be
> preceded and followed by at least one of the other
characters. Unicode
> characters from U+00A1 to U+00FF are also valid in an
alias, but they will
> be
> mapped to a best-fit US-ASCII string in the email
address which is
> generated
> from such an alias.
> WARNING: Object Public Folder Store has been corrupted
and it is in an
> inconsistent state. The following validation errors
have been encountered:
> WARNING: "PublicFolderStore(EMAIL)" is not valid for
Alias. Valid values
> are:
> Strings formed with characters from a to z (uppercase
or lowercase),
> digits
> from 0 to 9, !, #, $, %, ?
> One or
> more periods may be embedded in an alias, but each one
of them should be
> preceded and followed by at least one of the other
characters. Unicode
> characters from U+00A1 to U+00FF are also valid in an
alias, but they will
> be
> mapped to a best-fit US-ASCII string in the email
address which is
> generated
> from such an alias.
>
>
> So what hurculean feat do I need to do to get rid ot
the replicas and get
> this ()*?
>
Top
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: restore the exchange 2003 database to standalone exchange server
Date:
10/05/2007
07:50:29
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/244525
> "How to run Eseutil on a computer without Exchange
Server"
On top of this, what are you actually planning to do with
this database
copy? Is this just for test purposes or is there a
lightbulb shining
somewhere that wants you to put this copy back into
production?
Oliver
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: restore the exchange 2003 database to standalone exchange server
Date:
10/05/2007
05:47:05
On
Fri, 05 Oct 2007
06:50:51
-0000, aju wrote:
>I have a full backup of exchange 2003 server. Now, if I
need to
>restore this to a completely standalone server, what
would be the
>procedure? Any document you can show me on this topic?
>
>I want to run ESE util with this database without
disturbing
>production database.
>
>Really appreciate your help on this..
>
>Aju
You dont need another Exchange Server:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/244525
"How to run Eseutil on a computer without Exchange
Server"
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Retrieve priv.edb info
Date:
10/09/2007
13:12:18
On
Tue, 09 Oct 2007
11:06:16
-0700, exg001@gmail.com wrote:
>Ok, our Exchange 5.5 (old school yes) machine recently
died from
>hardware failure. We now have it up and running, but the
database is
>from scratch now.
>
>We have a company trying to extract the data out of our
old priv.edb
>database, but they are not having luck. They are telling
me that
>there might be a third-party tool to extract the info.
Since I still
>have a copy of priv.edb, I was wondering if there is
something that
>will extract from the database. Preferably directly from
the priv.edb
>file (I'd hate to setup a new Exchange machine to do
this). Ok, it
>might be corrupted too :(
>
>Help!
If you have got a company to touch your database files
that don't KNOW
that there are 3rd party tools then you need to stop
them, NOW!!!
There are several tools. Most often cited is
PowerControls from
http://www.ontrackpowercontrols.com/
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Run Exchange 2003 Server over Dynamic Cable line
Date:
10/09/2007
16:32:11
On
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:15:00
-0700, Adam
wrote:
>Has anyone configured an exchange 2003 server via
dynamic internet?
Yes.
>
>
>I know I can use services like dynsdns.org.
Yep. Good choice.
>
>Will the effect my mail IE getting blocked via reverse
IP lookups etc?
Not if you smarthost through their servers (cost you
extra)
>
>I know my ISP will block port 25 etc. But I think
dyndns.org has services
>to work around that.
Yes.
>
>Has anyone ever ran their systems like this?
>or is the risk too much?
No risk.
Enjoy.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Adam
>
>
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Secure SMTP virtual server from spam mail
Date:
10/08/2007
19:34:51
"Elton Seng Yan Thung" wrote:
>I have tested configure my Outlook and Outlook express
to require SMTP
>server authentication. However it is still fail
authentication.
Are you using a Cisco PIX firewall? If so, disable the
MailGuard
feature.
If you haven't checked the SMTP log file on your server,
how do you
know you're failing authentication vs just not
authenticating? Do you
see the AUTH command in the server log file?
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
John Oliver, Jr. [MVP] <jcoliverjr@hotmail.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Spam Filters Block Everything
Date:
10/08/2007
21:44:37
Did you restart the Transport Service?
--
John Oliver, Jr
MCSE, MCT, CCNA
Exchange MVP 2007
Microsoft Certified Partner
"create_share" wrote in message
news:20CABF86-F0D2-4A6A-A681-BFEDB51A9856@microsoft.com...
>I installed Spam Filters on my Hub Transport Server and
left it on default
> settings. After that i stopped receiving all outside
e-mails. Is there any
> document on how to configure the spam filter settings
or is it normal for
> it
> to block all the e-mails by default?
>
> Thankx!
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Strange problem
Date:
10/09/2007
11:48:08
To the contrary, my post does apply.
Most of the addresses you show must have been created
manually or by a
script or utility if there aren't corresponding entries
in a recipient
policy.
The "logon name" is not something you can use for
automatic addressing using
recipient policy. The KB article I posted tells you what
you can use. You
will need a custom code or utility to create your SMTP
addresses, or you'll
have to configure them manually.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Gregoire" wrote in message
news:OCkPkjkCIHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Ed Crowley, thanks a lot for your response but in my
case it doesn't
> apply.
>
> I make a screenshot more explicit :
>
> http://one.fsphost.com/user1234567/smtp.JPG
>
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: trying to connect to a remote public folder
Date:
10/10/2007
13:54:50
Also in the properties of your mailbox store(s) did you
change the default
public store to be the other server?
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Paul" wrote in message
news:057B545B-86B0-46C6-B63F-D1DD254C9DEA@microsoft.com...
> Hi,
>
> I am in the process of moving all the mailboxes and
public folders off one
> server onto a server in a remote location prior to
decomissioning the
> server.
>
> I am running exchange 2003 ent SP2. I have a routing
group connector set
> to
> allow public folder referals. I have just finished
moving the last public
> folder so I thought I would dismount the public store
seeing that it no
> longer consists of any public folders. When I dismount
the store I am not
> able to display any of the pubic folders that are now
in the remote store.
>
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Unable to Administer Public Folders in ESM 2003
Date:
10/09/2007
21:13:53
Is Outlook installed on the same machine?
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Ian" wrote in message
news:1191934798.406262.22300@o3g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>I have just tried to edit the settings of a public
folder and found
> that i cannot expand the tree. First of all it requests
that I enter a
> username and password, when i enter the user name and
password of the
> Exchange Admin, it comes up with an error message:
>
> The HTTP service used by public folders is not
available, possible
> causes are that public stores are not mounted and the
information
> store service is not running.
>
> ID no: c1030af3
> Exchange System Manager
>
> and doens't expand the Folder tree.
>
> I have tried dismounting and mounting the public folder
store. I have
> used ADSI edit tool and checked the
msExchOwningPFTreeBL entry and i
> believe that the path for the Public entry in IIS
Manager is correct
> (As i haven't changed it)
>
> I can access the public folders from a Microsoft
Outlook client and
> Outlook web access without any problems. I can also
browse to the
> public folders from within ESM and IIS manager.
>
> Nothing is logged in the event viewer.
>
> The only thing that might of cuased the problem is when
i created
> another HTTP Virtual server within ESM in order to have
2 SSL
> certificates on the same server. (We only have 1
Exchange server) it
> is configured as an RPC proxy server and holds all
mailboxes.
>
> Can someone please help as this is driving me nuts,
especially as I
> have to mail enable a number of Public folders I
created recently.
>
Top
From:
Alexander Zammit [MVP] <alex@respond_to_group>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Unable to receieve mail from Internet
Date:
10/05/2007
18:13:03
Whether you keep those other filters is something you
have to judge. Have a
look at what is configured under:
Global Settings | Message Delivery | Sender Filtering
Global Settings | Message Delivery | Recipient Filtering
If you disable, these won't be applied any longer. I
personally am not a big
fan of Sneder Filtering. However Recipient filtering is
quite useful
especially if it is used to block emails addressd to
invalid recipients (not
in AD).
In IMF you have two thresholds one for the gateway and
one for the Junk
Folder. What are the settings for each of these?
--
Alexander Zammit
WinDeveloper Software
IMF Tune - Unleash the Full Intelligent Message Filter
Power
http://www.windeveloper.com/imftune/
"AlphaDX" wrote in message
news:92B1C165-E9DD-4710-91E4-9D802DECB846@microsoft.com...
> Thanks!! Disabled IMF and message is flowing now.
Thanks again!!
>
> Now question, on this server I saw:
> Apply Sender Filter Checked.
> Apply Recipient Filter Checked.
> Apply Intellignet Message Filter Checked
> Global settings for IMF is 6
>
> I just Unchekd IMF. Mail appears to be flowing now.
Should I keep the
> other
> settings as before? Should I put the IMF back later?
>
> Many thanks for picking up my issue. Appreciated that.
>
>
>
> "Alexander Zammit [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> That response is generated by the Exchange IMF
anti-spam filter.
>> Try to disable IMF for a test:
>>
http://www.exchangeinbox.com/articles/017/imfproblems.htm#enableimf
>>
>> If this is the problem, check your threshold settings
under Global
>> Settings
>> | Message Delivery | Intelligent Message Filter
>> Keep in mind that the lower the thresholds the more
emails will be
>> blocked.
>>
>> --
>> Alexander Zammit
>> WinDeveloper Software
>> IMF Tune - Unleash the Full Intelligent Message Filter
Power
>> http://www.windeveloper.com/imftune/
>>
>>
>> "AlphaDX" wrote in message
>>
news:7570A683-C89E-41A8-B0B7-63FE514B6F72@microsoft.com...
>> > Excahnge Server 2003 with SP2
>> > Windows Server 2003 with SP2
>> > This is one of the four Exchange servers. There are
no Front-end
>> > Exchange
>> > server. Window 2003 domain.
>> > All services including SMTP is running. Mail to and
from inside the
>> > domain
>> > is flowing. Unable to receive mail from Internet.
>> >
>> > Can telnet from Internet, but
>> > ==================
>> > mail from:xxxxx@xxxx.com
>> > 250 2.1.0 xxxxx@xxxx.com....Sender OK
>> > rcpt to:yyyyy@xxxx.com
>> > 250 2.1.5 yyyyy@xxxx.com
>> > data
>> > 354 Start mail input; end with .
>> > test test test
>> > .
>> > 550 5.7.1 Requested action not taken: message
refused
>> > ===================
>> >
>> > Don't see any unusual event. After rebooting the
server few mails do
>> > come
>> > in
>> > and then stops.
>> >
>> > Request help. Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> > AlphaDX
>>
>>
>>
Top
From:
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Undelivered Message
Date:
10/10/2007
05:42:26
gwp wrote:
>> Sounds like a problem with the contents of the DL
itself. Have her
>> verify all the addresses are 100% correct and not
malformed - it's
>> been my experience that one malformed address will
prevent delivery
>> of the entire shebang. I'd see whether you can test
this yourself
>> with her, to the same DL.
>
> Have checked with the user again and the message was
resent a few
> days later to the same list. This time the list was
expanded in the
> message before it was sent and tracking was turned on
and everything
> worked ok, no changes were made to the DL.
>
> Opening Tools/Address Book/Contacts shows a number of
entries that
> cannot be opened (all with same name) that do not
appear when
> clicking on the Contacts button and some of the
contacts here do not
> appear in the first list. (personal contacts stored in
contacts
> folder on server).
>
> Could this be the cause
Yes, sounds like something's wrong with her DL
> and what is the best option?
I'd have her re-create it. You might also try posting in
an Outlook group
for more help, as DLs in mailbox contacts aren't an
Exchange thing.
> Thanks.
Top
From:
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Undelivered Message
Date:
10/09/2007
07:39:17
gwp wrote:
> Server: E2K3 SP2
> Client: Otlook 2k3 SP2
>
> User sent message to a personal distribution list.
Message appeared
> in her inbox and in sent items with correct time-stamp
but nobody
> else in the list received it. Message tracking does not
list the
> message but other messages sent shortly after this are
fine. There
> were no known server problems at this time.
>
> Any ideas as to how this has happened?
>
> Thanks.
Sounds like a problem with the contents of the DL itself.
Have her verify
all the addresses are 100% correct and not malformed -
it's been my
experience that one malformed address will prevent
delivery of the entire
shebang. I'd see whether you can test this yourself with
her, to the same
DL.
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Update mailbox deletion status
Date:
10/09/2007
11:42:28
You're right about that, but you can consider it an
opportunity to practice
your disaster recovery process, something that you
probably don't ever have
time to do unless your boss needs something like that.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Brian" wrote in message
news:999D4703-ACA2-44B8-8755-D583362811F3@microsoft.com...
>I have not done brick-level backups for a couple of
years. I thought I was
> still getting the backup errors after I quit doing
brick-level backups,
> but I
> could be wrong. It is entirely possible that my memory
about backup
> failures
> was formed when I was doing brick-level backups and
that I have not tested
> it
> since then. I will have to revisit it.
>
> I do have to say, though, that there was one time when
a manager came to
> me
> three months after a user had left ?
> info...and wanted the mailbox back. Since I actually
have a tiered backup
> structure, I actually had a tape that had that mailbox
in the store--but
> was
> it ever a pain having to restore the entire store,
extract the one mailbox
> to
> a PST, and then put the live store back in place! Or am
I missing
> something
> in that process?
>
> "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Don't backup mailboxes (the "brick backups" in my
autosignature). It's a
>> worthless feature, especially now that you can use
deleted item recovery
>> and
>> deleted mailbox recovery. Back up the Information
Store object and skip
>> backing up mailboxes.
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> "Brian" wrote in message
>>
news:DF676658-C98A-4402-8A9A-E182221983C9@microsoft.com...
>> > My backup software (Symantec BE) generates an error
when it attempts to
>> > backup the mailbox if the user is deleted, so I have
been in the habit
>> > of
>> > purging the mailbox as soon as I remove the user.
>> >
>> > "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>> >
>> >> The mailbox will stay until after the expiry of the
deleted mailbox
>> >> recovery
>> >> period, a full backup has been taken, and online
store maintenance has
>> >> run.
>> >> After those things happen, the mailbox will be
purged by the system.
>> >>
>> >> If you don't have any security reasons to purge the
mailbox, you ought
>> >> to
>> >> leave it there in case a couple days later a
manager runs over to you
>> >> and
>> >> asks to recover it because the person isn't leaving
after all.
>> >> --
>> >> Ed Crowley
>> >> MVP - Exchange
>> >> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>> >>
>> >> "Brian" wrote in message
>> >>
news:D7BA0FEE-BA50-4BE2-92FF-77BCB9E363C0@microsoft.com...
>> >> >I don't know whether this is an SBS issue or an
Exchange issue. When
>> >> >I
>> >> >delete
>> >> > a user from ActiveDirectory, including the users'
mailbox, I go
>> >> > through
>> >> > this
>> >> > process in the Exchange System Manager after the
AD deletion to
>> >> > ensure
>> >> > the
>> >> > mailbox is purged.
>> >> >
>> >> > Server -> First Storage Group -> Mailbox Store ()
->
>> >> > Mailboxes
>> >> > Right-click
>> >> > Click Run Cleanup Agent
>> >> > Mailbox now has a red X
>> >> > Right-click the mailbox
>> >> > Click Purge, then OK
>> >> >
>> >> > However, sometimes nothing happens when I Run
Cleanup Agent. I have
>> >> > to
>> >> > return sometime later to try again, and it works.
I know there is
>> >> > some
>> >> > update
>> >> > that is missing in between there, but I don't
know how to trigger it
>> >> > manually. Is it in Recipient Update Service?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Update mailbox deletion status
Date:
10/08/2007
22:06:50
Brian wrote:
[ snip ]
>a PST, and then put the live store back in place! Or am
I missing something
>in that process?
A recovery server? Or the ability to say "No"?
If you keep backups long enough someone's gonna ask you
to restore
'em. That might be someone in you company, or it may be a
court order.
:-(
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: User still showing up on Distribution List
Date:
10/09/2007
17:54:20
An address list is not the same thing as a group. You're
using the term
"distribution list" but that is so Exchange 5.5. The
proper term now is
"distribution group", and membership in a group has
absolutely nothing to do
with visibility in address lists. An address list is a
listing that shows
up as an address book, like the Global Address List or
All Users. A user
can be in a distribution group whether or not it is mail-
or
mailbox-enabled, just as any user could be a member of a
Windows NT group,
or an Active Directory security group.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"markj" wrote in message
news:72CB51A1-ECB1-4E79-BAFA-AB981361CFD3@microsoft.com...
> But if the associated mailbox still exists, I have the
option to "Hide
> from
> Exchange Address Lists". Sounds more like a bug/design
flaw to me.
> Thanks for responding.
> Mark
>
> "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> But the user account still exists? If so, that is by
design.
>> --
>> Ed Crowley
>> MVP - Exchange
>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>>
>> "markj" wrote in message
>>
news:7A488D63-56B4-4FA8-AE26-74EC15E095B5@microsoft.com...
>> > Hi Ed,
>> > Yes the mailbox was deleted. I have also tried to
use the "Remove
>> > Exchange
>> > Attributes" setting in ADUC.
>> > Mark
>> >
>> > "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>> >
>> >> The mailbox was deleted? Is the user account still
mail- or
>> >> mailbox-enabled?
>> >> --
>> >> Ed Crowley
>> >> MVP - Exchange
>> >> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
>> >>
>> >> "markj" wrote in message
>> >>
news:B7F75B8F-9BDA-441B-9460-04028BCED8A0@microsoft.com...
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> > I have a Universal Distribution List and a user
account that had its
>> >> > associated Exchagne 2003 mailbox deleted.
>> >> > The user account is still showing up as a member
of Universal DL.
>> >> > Anyone
>> >> > know why?
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Mark
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: User still showing up on Distribution List
Date:
10/09/2007
16:30:54
On
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:26:00
-0700, markj
wrote:
>Hi,
>I have a Universal Distribution List and a user account
that had its
>associated Exchagne 2003 mailbox deleted.
>The user account is still showing up as a member of
Universal DL. Anyone
>know why?
>Thanks,
>Mark
From where? The Outlook GAL? If so, is the client in
Cache Mode and
has the Offline Address Book been rebuilt yet on the
server?
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Users can still use OWA if I disable their AD account
Date:
10/09/2007
12:14:30
For how long can they do this? Permissions are cached for
a while when
there's a connection.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"computertech33" wrote in message
news:1191943892.944059.148080@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
>I noticed that if I disable a 2003 AD account, that a
user that was
> logged in before I disabled the account can still
access OWA. Users
> that were not logged in to OWA at the time I disabled
their account,
> could not access OWA.
>
> Is there some service I need to update or what? This
seems very
> unsecure.
>
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: users in trusted domain to access the exchange server through OWA
Date:
10/09/2007
18:02:42
I'm not sure that this will work, but have you tried
using the URL:
https://computername/exchange/alias
where alias is the mailbox alias, and then authenticating
with the trusted
domain's ID and password?
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"John" wrote in message
news:520AA30D-8035-4555-AB0B-E33215659212@microsoft.com...
> Hi all,
>
> Can the users in trusted domain to access the exchange
server in the
> trusting domain through OWA? (Exchange 2003 SP2,
windows 2003 R2 and
> windows
> 2000 DCs. two way external trusts) The trusted users
have no problem to
> access emails through outlook. I just could not get
them to access email
> through OWA? Logon failure in the logon screen.
>
> Can anyone shred light on me?
>
> Thank you.
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Where on the system (registry, file, etc..) are changes made when you make
changes in Exchange System Manager
Date:
10/09/2007
19:55:40
mdprice1@gmail.com wrote:
[ snip ]
>And I'm sure that everyone will be embracing the wonder
that is
>Exchange 2007...just like how every corporate
environment embraces the
>newest version of Windows as soon as it comes out.
What's your point? It'll still be released and you'll
either be back
at doing whatever it is you're doing of have figured out
that what
you're doing really has little to do with running an
Exchange
orgganization. Either way I won't care.
>At what point did you offer anything helpful?
Besides pointing out that commercial products will detect
changes?
None. But, then again, I didn't claim to offer anything
to help you.
I'm not sure that knowing that property value A is
changed when
interface B receives keystroke C is very useful to anyone
except the
interface designer.
>Pseudo-experts only get
>in the way.
I don't claim to be an expert in all matters. Certainly
not in the
arena in which you're striving.
>You obviously don't have an answer for the very specific
>question I was asking, so why clutter the thread with
responses that
>don't address the issue? I would expect more from an
"Exchange MVP".
The thread seems to be at a dead end except for your
yammering on at
me derailing it (which I didn't do, unless you think that
my
one-sentence was that disruptive). If you'd like to
continue this
pointless exchange, please respond.
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Where on the system (registry, file, etc..) are changes made when you make
changes in Exchange System Manager
Date:
10/09/2007
17:56:12
That's for her "enhanced services".
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Andy David {MVP}" wrote in message
news:8b1og3h7qhncd1v74ig7s72tpg4sp33j8k@4ax.com...
> On
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:46:31
-0700, "Ed Crowley [MVP]"
> wrote:
>
>>Knowing Rich, I'm certain that he has a lot of the
answers, but he's not
>>of
>>a mind to perform the substantial academic exercise
required to answer
>>your
>>question. You have been helped as much as you have any
right to expect to
>>have been helped in a no-cost forum such as this one.
>
>
> No cost?
> Crap. I've been paying 12.95 month to "Lanwench Inc."
>
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Where on the system (registry, file, etc..) are changes made when you make
changes in Exchange System Manager
Date:
10/09/2007
17:49:55
On
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:46:31
-0700, "Ed Crowley [MVP]"
wrote:
>Knowing Rich, I'm certain that he has a lot of the
answers, but he's not of
>a mind to perform the substantial academic exercise
required to answer your
>question. You have been helped as much as you have any
right to expect to
>have been helped in a no-cost forum such as this one.
No cost?
Crap. I've been paying 12.95 month to "Lanwench Inc."
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Where on the system (registry, file, etc..) are changes made when you make
changes in Exchange System Manager
Date:
10/08/2007
19:41:40
mdprice1@gmail.com wrote:
[ snip ]
>Well of course it's more academic than practical.
"Of course"? I didn't see any mention of this in your
line of
questioning or any of reasons for wanting to do this.
>Please stop
>derailing this thread with pointless comments as I don't
need feedback
>on how to approach config management.
Okay. Have fun.
>It looks like the list that I am looking for does not
exist in the
>public domain, so I'll have to publish my findings when
I'm done.
By the time you finish the next release of Exchange will
be ready.
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Where on the system (registry, file, etc..) are changes made when you make
changes in Exchange System Manager
Date:
10/05/2007
19:48:55
mdprice1@gmail.com wrote:
[ snip ]
>Unless Ecora has a list that maps changes in ESM to
where they are
>changed on the system, I don't see how that is going to
hep.
That would be a shortsighted approach to configuration
management. I
can change things in many ways that don't use the ESM and
yet they'll
have the same effect. ADSIEDIT, LDP, VB, VBS, Perl,
(insert any
language that can use ADSI, LDAP, and/or COM),
REGEDIT,
SC, and
on and
on.
Your project sounds more academic than practical.
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Top
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Windows Network Load Balancing with Exchange 2007 CAS role not wor
Date:
10/09/2007
16:40:04
On
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 06:24:02
-0700, GC Email Manager
wrote:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/clustering/archive/2005/10/21/71893.aspx
I didnt read all that, but try following Russ' advice. I
have used
this before and it just works.
Top
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Windows SBS 2003 R2 Premium and ISA 2004 installation woes
Date:
10/09/2007
18:00:34
Those wizards are unique to SBS, so I strongly recommend
that you post your
question to an SBS newsgroup because the SBS MVPs hang
out there a lot more
than they do here.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"BMillikan" wrote in message
news:F86E7644-21C6-47F7-9893-CFDF10ACBED5@microsoft.com...
>I "somewhat" successfully installed Windows SBS 2003 SP1
Premium onto my
> computer. The reason I saw "somewhat" is that since I
installed the SBS
> server initially, I cannot run the CEICW anymore
without errors. I also
> get
> MMC errors from time to time and it bails out. I also
recently installed
> WSUS and the "snap-in" is not working to the MMC.
>
> But, I need the most assistance with setting up the ISA
server 2004 that
> is
> on the same computer. I have several systems on my
network and I don't
> think
> any of them are running the same OS. I was able to
"somewhat" establish
> internet access for some of my machines by explicitly
entering the proxy
> server information on a few of my machines. However,
I'm trying to do an
> install of an operating system that (apparently) needs
unhindered internet
> access to install. You'd think it would just install
from the DVD first
> and
> then update, but it won't install unless it detects
sites on the internet
> it
> uses. I'd really like to have the filtering
capabilities of a proxy
> server,
> but I really need it to be "invisible" to the client
computers. I don't
> really want to setup every new computer to use the
proxy server.
> Especially
> computers that may be issued at work and should work
seemlessly into my
> network.
>
> I tried to publish the SBS secure (https) site for
access, but I'm getting
> a
> cert error: "Technical Information (for support
personnel)
>
> * Error Code: 500 Internal Server Error. The
certificate chain was
> issued by an authority that is not trusted.
(-2146893019) "
>
> I'm not sure if this message is from the SBS server (my
server) or local
> server. This used to work fine before I installed ISA
2004.
>
> The internal computer name resolutions are not working
properly. Even to
> the server itself. I had to type the IP address of the
server to get some
> of
> my mail clients to connect to the SBS server (and
Exchange 2k3). This
> also
> used to work before I installed ISA 2004.
>
> Another thing that broke when I installed ISA 2004 is
the POP3 connectors
> to
> my ISPs mail server. The mail is now just accumulating
in my mail
> server's
> mailboxes. If the POP3 port is not opened, then I'd
assume the SMTP port
> is
> also not open. So, no mail could get out either. I was
having issues
> with
> this before the ISA 04 server was installed. I'm not
sure why. The logs
> aren't giving me any clues.
>
> I'm using IIS just for the internal sharepoint website,
which is fine.
> But,
> right now, http://companyweb is not working from any
client and since the
> name resolution is not working either, I can't
http://[server hostname]
> either. I have to use the IP address. I'd like my
externally viewable
> web
> site to be hosted on another machine. So, port 80
should be routed to
> another server computer. I'm not sure how to do this.
>
> I supposedly published "OWA" to access it from outside,
but that doesn't
> seem to be working either. I usually get to it through
the secure base
> web
> site anyway.
>
> I don't think I need outbound or published NTP because
I'm setting up
> another box that'll run NTP. So, it should just need
the NTP inbound port
> opened to connect to the various NTP servers out there.
>
> Ideally, Exchange 2k3 should be able to "listen" on
port 25 (SMTP), but
> that
> port is completely blocked (as well as a few others) by
my ISP. In
> addition,
> it seems that Exchange "inserts" or puts in your
username@FQDN in the
> "Reply"
> field when mail goes out. So if someone replies, it'll
try to get to my
> server but it'll be blocked by my ISP (since port 25 is
blocked). Is
> there a
> way to keep the original address (the ISP given email
address) as the
> reply
> address instead of using the username@FQDN address? It
would be nice if
> that
> worked, but apparently that is a standard thing for
ISPs to do now even if
> you have a static IP and are hosting your own web
site(s).
>
> Accessing Exchange from internal clients (Outlook
and/or Entourage [for
> Mac]) is "quirky" at best. Sometimes it comes right up,
sometimes it
> doesn't. Both my Mac client and
Vista x64 (Outlook
2007) client
> disconnected
> from the Exchange server and I was able to get
Entourage reconnected, but
> not
> Outlook 07.
>
> My ultimate goal here is to get this server setup as a
> router/firewall/proxy? or content filter/internet
gateway/DNS
> server/Sharepoint server/Web server relay/NTP server
relay/unnoticeable or
> seemless introduction of a new computer or device to
the network with
> unhindered access to the internet (if it's on my
intranet, I can trust
> it...
> except for when our kids have their own computers and I
want the
> capability
> of IP/content filtering)/fax server/single printer
server/Exchange
> server/WSUS/etc.
>
> Thats not asking much, right? :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
> --
> Brian Millikan
> Computer/Software Engineer
> Microsoft Control Applications (Dialog-Based)
Specialist / Hardware Driver
> Development / User-Level Hardware Device Interfaces
>
Top
From:
Bharat Suneja [MVP] <bharat@nospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: WM6 UNC Paths and ActiveSync
Date:
10/06/2007
05:21:19
Links in an email.
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"Joe" wrote in message
news:0F2A96CD-E3D5-427E-9FC2-895D4CDC81E4@microsoft.com...
> Silly question... How do you access a UNC path from a
WM6 smartphone
> using
> Exchange2007 Active sync?
>
> All the Exch2007 Active Sync Documentation says you can
use active sync to
> connect to UNC file shares. I'm all setup on the server
end.
>
> But Where how on the smartphone do you go to a UNC
share using Active Sync
> or Outlook?
Top
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: [Exchange 2003] Do not deliver before...
Date:
10/10/2007
06:16:34
Exchange won't do this with enough granularity for you.
Have you asked
in the Outlook newsgroups since this is not a server-side
function?
Top
