Home | Site Map | Cisco How ToNet How To | Wireless |Search | Forums | Services | Donations | Careers | About Us | Contact Us|

mount point volume vs. drive letters

Active Directory, Domain, DNS, WINS, DHCP, SBS, New Releases.

mount point volume vs. drive letters

Postby guest » Sun Nov 16, 2008 9:31 pm

I have been into similar situations and asked same question in regards to
cluster and its implementation in the past
Below are my two cents in this regard,
Using Mount point is more efficient and safer in my opinion.
Assigning multiple Drive letters will complicate the configurations
(administration and backup)

It is confusing to see many drive letters assigned to each LUN etc
Risk of running out of drive letters

Each drive letter will need to re-assign to the fail over node, which may
take longer time for cluster to fail over




--
Oz Ozugurlu
MVP (Exchange)
MCITP (EMA), MCITP (EA),MCITP (SA)
MCSE 2003, M+, S+, MCDST
Security+, Project +, Server +


"John" wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> If I do not run our of drive letters, is there any advantage using
> mountvolume instead of using drive letters?
>
>
> Thank you!
Tablet and Smartphone Setup Guide
http://www.quicksetupguide.com

Troubleshooting Vista Wireless
http://chicagotech.net/
guest
 
Posts: 10191
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:10 pm

Return to Windows

Your Ad Here

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 8 guests