Home | Site Map | Cisco How To | Net How To | Wireless | Search | Forums | Services | Donations | Careers | About Us | Contact Us|
|
|
Home | Site Map | Cisco How To | Net How To | Wireless | Search | Forums | Services | Donations | Careers | About Us | Contact Us| |
|
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Cannot connect to the routing master on port 25 Best Pracices analyzer
results.. on Exchange 2007 (removed 2003)...
Date:
markm75 wrote:
>I had successfully migrated all public folders over
to 2007.. changed >the RUS server setting on exchange 2003.. then
removed the routing >group connector in system manager on exchange 2003
from both servers.. > >If i now run the analyzer it gives me that error..
I'm sure it is rgc >related, but i'm not sure how to fix it, or if its a
problem.. (i have >exchange 2003 offline, but havent run the uninstall
of it yet)...
Because E2K3 is still present in the routing group
there should be a Routing Group Master. E2K7 doesn't use Routing
Groups. You can ignore that error (unless you have other E2K3 servers).
--
Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
From:
Bharat Suneja [MVP] <bharat@nospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: A way to globally link a managed default folder policy to all mailboxes,
rather than 1 by 1 in 2007 Exchange?
Date:
No, that's remarkable in its absence. You can use a
particular account as a
template when creating a new account, or apply using
a command and have it
run on a schedule.
Applying Managed Folder Policy to more than one user
http://exchangepedia.com/blog/2007/05/applying-managed-folder-policy-to-more.html
--
Bharat Suneja MVP - Exchange www.zenprise.com NEW blog location: exchangepedia.com/blog ----------------------------------------------
"markm75" wrote in message
news:1191591593.082262.317220@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > I've setup a default folder (retension) policy and
linked it to a few > mailboxes to see if it works.. so far so good.. but
i'd like to do > this for all mailboxes at one time, or maybe even
have it enabled for > all, then when a new box is added, it automatically
gets applied.. > > Is there a way to do this? > > Thanks >
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: About to remove last Ex2k3 server..
Date:
On
>We're entirely Ex2k7 now, save for one Ex2k3
front-end server. It's one of
>our Internet gateway servers (along with two newly
minted Edge servers.)
>It's not used for RPC or anything else other than
passing mail to and from
>the Internet. Does Microsoft provide some guidance
(ie a white paper or
>"how to") for removing the last Ex2k3 server? I
don't want to miss
>anything. > >Thanks in advance!
> Sure:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb288905.aspx It's the first result on a Google for >Remove Last
Exchange 2003
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Active Sync Device Mail Fails Intermittently to One Address
Date:
If you have a Cisco PIX firewall make sure the
Mailguard feature is
disabled. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"NW" wrote in message
news:%235zrQtzCIHA.2268@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Anyone else want to take a stab at this? I haven't
seen a further reply
> from Andy David. > > > "NW" wrote in message
> news:uAO7$5RBIHA.1356@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> >> >> >> "Andy David {MVP}" wrote in
>> message
news:f823g3t9h3qcfjogq4ddkoqgvoftukn66a@4ax.com... >>> On >>> >>>>Exchange 2003, SP2, W2003 SP1 Standard, Motorola
Q >>>> >>>>A users mobile device email is not being recieved
by his wife at her MSN >>>>account, about every 4th time she will recieve
one. His address is in
>>>>her >>>>safe list. She recieves his mail fine from his
workstation but there is
>>>>a >>>>problem with his mobile device where mail isn't
being sent to her >>>>intermittently. >>>> >>>>Message tracking shows the message submitted to
the store, advanced >>>>queueing, submission to categorizer, queued for
routing, queued for
>>>>Remote >>>>delivery, starting outbound transfer, then gives
an error, "Message >>>>transferred to
***************************************************...." >>> >>> It actually says that? >>>
***************************************************...." >>> >>> Using a Cisco Pix Fierwall? >>> >> >> >> Andy, thanks for your reply, and yes, does display
just a string of
>> asterisks--its quite a bit longer than displayed
here, probably 256 of
>> them if I had to guess. >> >> And yes, we are using a Cisco firewall, it is the
5505 ASA. >> >> The problem doesn't seem to be occurring now,
though if there's something
>> caused by the firewall then I have archived
syslogs I can check.
>> Anything in particular I should look for? >> > >
From:
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Additional mailbox in cached mode
Date:
Andy David {MVP} wrote: > On > wrote: > >> On >> wrote: >> >>> Mark Arnold [MVP] wrote: >>>> On >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I want to run Outlook in cached mode with
additional mailboxes. It >>>>> works fine for the user's mailbox but not on
the additional >>>>> mailbox that some users have. I have checked
the cashed mode in >>>>> the additional mailbox setup but this doesn't
work. Since it is an >>>>> option for this in that additional mailbox
setup this should be >>>>> supported. I can't index a mailbox that is not
running in cached >>>>> mode. Anybody knows how to accomplish this? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Terje >>>>> >>>> If I understand the question correctly you can
only cache your own >>>> mailbox in the OST file. You can't cache someone
else's. >>> >>> Yep -although I *think* Outlook 2007 allows this,
(I don't have it >>> here ? >>> >> I've got 2007 and it won't let me sync my
"Journaling" mailbox. :-( > > It does let you sync a shared calendar though I
believe :P
Not the whole other mailbox? Hmm - well, I'm not
using it yet, so what do I
know? > > Im just trying to get Lanwench's goat.
Ah, right. I forgot you moved to a state which has no
laws against such
things. > > >> >>> To the OP: re indexing, you might try getting (an
old copy of?) >>> Lookout. Very handy.
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Additional mailbox in cached mode
Date:
On wrote:
>On > wrote: > >>Mark Arnold [MVP] wrote: >>> On >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I want to run Outlook in cached mode with
additional mailboxes. It >>>> works fine for the user's mailbox but not on the
additional mailbox >>>> that some users have. I have checked the cashed
mode in the >>>> additional mailbox setup but this doesn't work.
Since it is an >>>> option for this in that additional mailbox setup
this should be >>>> supported. I can't index a mailbox that is not
running in cached >>>> mode. Anybody knows how to accomplish this? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Terje >>>> >>> If I understand the question correctly you can
only cache your own >>> mailbox in the OST file. You can't cache someone
else's. >> >>Yep -although I *think* Outlook 2007 allows this,
(I don't have it here ? >>can't test). >> >I've got 2007 and it won't let me sync my
"Journaling" mailbox. :-(
It does let you sync a shared calendar though I
believe :P
Im just trying to get Lanwench's goat.
> >>To the OP: re indexing, you might try getting (an
old copy of?) Lookout.
>>Very handy. >>
From:
Bharat Suneja [MVP] <bharat@nospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: anti spam rules XC 2007
Date:
Exchange Server 2003's Intelligent Message Filter
(IMF) and the Content
Filter Agent in Exchange Server 2007 are blackboxes -
there's no visibility
into how they filter spam or what's included in the
updates.
You can certainly use your own keywords, IP Block
List Providers (RBLs),
Sender ? helps... ), etc, and/or tweak the SCL thresholds.
If it doesn't seem to work for you, look at 3rd-party
solutions and
services, including Microsoft's own filtering service
provided by Exchange
Hosted Services. --
Bharat Suneja MVP - Exchange www.zenprise.com NEW blog location: exchangepedia.com/blog ----------------------------------------------
"chriske911" wrote in message
news:75f80c025e3278c9d7d7f8df7f44@news.microsoft.com... >I have to prep an XC 2007 server for production > all is working OK except for the spam part > there is still too much coming in > > I have enabled all features and also enabled the
automatic download of
> spam updates > > I was just wondering if I have to add keywords to
the content filtering
> myself or are they being pushed by the updates? > > grtz > >
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Antispam
Date:
"Phil McNeill" wrote:
>GFI ME has 8 or 10 different filters it will run a
message through including
>DNSBLs, directory harvesting checks, a Bayesian
filter that can be trained
>to recognize SPAM and a variety of others. Each
filter can be
>enabled/disabled and configured independently (i.e.
you don't have to use
>them all, although most people do). Out of the box
it works quite well,
>however before you actually turn on the filtering
they recommend that you
>leave it in just learning mode to start with for a
week or so. That allows
>it to auto-populate your whitelist (it does this by
watching your outbound
>mail and whitelisting all addresses you send to),
All those OOF messages! :-)
>as well as train the
>Bayesian filter to suit your organization. This is
all automatic.
Without guidance, how does the Bayesian filter learn?
Statistical filters work well for individuals. For
enterprises, not so well. One person's spam is another one's mailing
list. IOW, don't place a large dependence on this technique, no matter
what the proponents say. The tokenizer is the key part of
statistical filters. What parts of the message will be used as tokens?
What parts of images will participate? Is whitespace the boundary for
words? Or does the tokenizer chop the message into fixed sized chunks
(say, five characters)? Do the tokens overlap? Important
questions if you have to deal with written languages that don't depend on
whitespace to separate words. :-)
>With DNSBLs, you generally want to pick just a few,
as they slow your
>inbound mail.
Slow? They'll stop it if you're not careful.
--
Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: anyone using bmail.exe with exchange 2007? (invalid address error via
the command script)..
Date:
You can compose and send mail from the command line
without any utility at
all. For example:
@ECHO OFF
ECHO To:harry.potter@hogwarts.int> Message.msg
ECHO From:severus.snape@hogwarts.int>> Message.msg
ECHO Subject:Wand Recall>> Message.msg
ECHO.>> Message.msg
ECHO Please return your wand to Ollivander's,>>
Message.msg
ECHO Makers of Fine Wands since 382 BC, Diagon
Alley,>> Message.msg
ECHO for replacement due to a manufacturer recall.>>
Message.msg
ECHO Thank you,>> Message.msg
ECHO Mr. Ollivander, Proprietor>>Message.msg
ECHO .>> Message.msg
MOVE Message.msg "D:\EXCHSRVR\Mailroot\vsi 1\PickUp"
The last line moves the message file to the PickUp
directory on the Exchange
server; of course the ID under which this batch file
runs must have access
to write to that directory. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"markm75" wrote in message
news:1192043504.147334.106450@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > The same command line code always worked with 2003
exchange, but now > with 2007 it fails.. wondering if there is another
alternative to this > command line emailer.. > > It seems no matter what i put in the address
section it results with > "invalid address".. > > Anyone using bmail or something similar with 2k7? >
From:
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Are my HOST Records set correctly?
Date:
DAiuto wrote: > To be honest. I'm not really sure. > I was thrown into this mess and I don't want to
make changes that > could be there for a reason. > To give you the layout: > We have a T1 that comes into the Router, which goes
into the VPN. The > VPN to the Switch, which has the workstations and
servers connected > to it. > Server 1 is an application server running terminal
server, and Server > 2 is a web and Exchange server. > Server1 also hosts the RDP sessions for 6 remote
sites through the VPN > hardware.
OK - not sure what to tell you. The problem you're
having isn't to do with
Exchange. :( > > "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote: > >> DAiuto wrote: >>> To answer your recent question: Prodigy is
blocking the >>> 63.238.167.172 IP address. >>> I'm sorry, I just saw your comment about the NPR
from your old post >>> a few days ago. I noticed you made a note of it
again. I'm going to >>> add that and see if it makes a difference. Will
that take a few >>> days to update because of DNS or will it be
immediate? >>> Also looking at the post from a few days ago the
firewall's external >>> IP address is 10.0.0.1 which links to the Kentrox
router. >> >> So your internal network is behind two devices
which are each doing >> NAT? Why? >> >>> The >>> router's external IP is .169 which has NAT global
IPs. IP >>> 63.238.167.172 is mapped to 10.0.0.1. Along with
..170 ...171 while >>> ...173 jumps right to 192.168.1.11 (address of
the >>> webserver/exchange server). >>> >> Something smells fishy here....this doesn't make a
lot of sense to >> me. >> >>> >>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote: >>> >>>> DAiuto wrote: >>>>> I was checking out my VPN and it has a Port
Forwarding setting >>>>> that is concerning me. This was supposed to be
specific for mail. >>>>> The setting has: >>>>> Modify Packet Filter Rule = Yes >>>>> Incoming interface = >>>>> Source Address = Any >>>>> Destination Address = Any >>>>> Services = tcp/21, tcp/20, tcp/80, tcp/443,
tcp/25, tcp/23 >>>>> To: 192.168.1.11 (This is the address to the
combination >>>>> webserver/Exchange server) >>>>> __________ >>>>> Since the Modify Packet Filter Rule is checked
'Yes', here is the >>>>> packet filter rule: >>>>> Action = Accept >>>>> Type = Forward >>>>> Incoming Interface = >>>>> Outgoing Interface = Any >>>>> Source Address = Any >>>>> Destination Address = 192.168.1.11 >>>>> Services = tcp/21, tcp/20, tcp/80, tcp/443,
tcp/25, tcp/23 >>>>> >>>>> Does this look right? >>>>> Shouldn't there be something in there for smtp? >>>> >>>> I'm honestly not sure what your firewall is or
should be doing >>>> here. As I said, there should be no need for a
one-to-one NAT >>>> ...you ought to be able to use the WAN interface
IP for >>>> everything, and just do port
forwarding/triggering. Try changing >>>> it and see if this helps. Note that the ..172
address PTR isn't >>>> mail.simoneye.com- if you're going to use it,
I'd change it to >>>> that one. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here is the error message I get when I send an
email to a Prodigy >>>>> member (keep in mind, they said they have
already removed me >>>> >>>> Which IP?? >>>> >>>>> from the >>>>> blacklist, something must be triggering it to
put us back on): >>>>> "The following recipient(s) could not be
reached: >>>>> >>>>> Joe Jones (joejones@prodigy.net) on >>>>> The message cannot be delivered due to a
configuration >>>>> error on the server. Please contact your
Administrator. >>>>> >>>>> flpi118,DNSBL:To request removal of,
63.238.167.172, send the >>>>> complete error message in an E-mail to >>>>> removeme@sbc.sbcglobal.net>" >>>> >>>>> >>>>>
_______________________________________________________________ >>>>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> DAiuto wrote: >>>>>>> Sorry about that. >>>>>>> The full IP address is 63.238.167.173 or .172 >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, your MX record is mail.simoneye.com,
which points to .173 >>>>>> >>>>>> If you have a firewall configured with .172 as
its external >>>>>> interface IP, but have a one-to-one NAT for
.173, I suppose that >>>>>> might explain something. I'm not sure, but I'm
also not sure it's >>>>>> relevant. This isn't the most common
configuration - there'sno >>>>>> reason you can't just use port forwarding on a
single public IP. >>>>>> >>>>>>> The domain name is simoneye.com >>>>>>> Here is the exact header the recipient gets: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. I'm not sure why you're posting
headers, though. You said >>>>>> you were getting "booted from certain domains"
- which means, you >>>>>> must be getting NDRs. That's what we would
need to see. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did notice that the .173 address has a PTR,
but the PTR >>>>>> specifies your domain (simoneye.com) and not a
host ( >>>>>> ____.simoneye.com) - since you clearly get to
customize your >>>>>> PTR, I suggest you make it match your MX
record ? >>>>>> greeting on your server, which is
mail.simoneye.com. That said, >>>>>> the PTR for .172 is your ISP's default - you
may want to change >>>>>> that,as it's the PTR the recipient servers
will look up. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> From Ron D'Aiuto Mon Sep 24 >>>>>>> Return-Path:
>>>>>>> Authentication-Results:
mta209.mail.re4.yahoo.com >>>>>>> from=simoneye.com; domainkeys=neutral (no
sig) >>>>>>> Received: from 63.238.167.172 (EHLO
mail.simoneye.com) >>>>>>> (63.238.167.172) by mta209.mail.re4.yahoo.com
with SMTP; Mon, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> urn:content-classes:message Subject: Test >>>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>>>>> Content-Type: multipart/related; >>>>>>>
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7FEB3.36A50E35"; >>>>>>> type="multipart/alternative" >>>>>>> Disposition-Notification-To: "Ron D'Aiuto" >>>>>>> Date: >>>>>>> Message-ID: >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thread-Topic: Test >>>>>>> Thread-Index:
Acf+sze/uFrU/XkRTWC8Ygo5DOjbXA== >>>>>>> From: "Ron D'Aiuto"
>>>>>>> To:
>>>>>>> Content-Length: 7270 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> DAiuto wrote: >>>>>>>>> I didn't configure our Exchange account so
I'm trying to back >>>>>>>>> track and fix a couple issues. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi - what's the exact text of the NDR the
recipient gets? Also, >>>>>>>> it would make it a lot easier to help you if
you hadn't munged >>>>>>>> all the relevant info (your domain name/IP
addresses). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We keep getting booted from certain domains >>>>>>>>> like Prodigy.net The IP address listed in a
recipients email >>>>>>>>> header shows XXX.XXX.XXX.172 >>>>>>>>> My Host records show Hostname = @; Record
type = A (Address); >>>>>>>>> Address = XXX.XXX.XXX.173; >>>>>>>>> and Hostname = mail; Record type = A
(Address); Address = >>>>>>>>> XXX.XXX.XXX.173; >>>>>>>>> In my Mail Host Records I have Hostname = @
(none); Record >>>>>>>>> type = MX; Address = mail.mydomain.com.;
Pref = 10; >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The recipient header shows: >>>>>>>>> From John Doe Mon Sep 24 >>>>>>>>> Return-Path:
>>>>>>>>> Authentication-Results:
mta209.mail.re4.yahoo.com >>>>>>>>> from=mydomain.com; domainkeys=neutral (no
sig) >>>>>>>>> Received: from 63.238.167.172 (EHLO
mail.mydomain.com) >>>>>>>>> (63.238.167.172) by
mta209.mail.re4.yahoo.com with SMTP; Mon, >>>>>>>>> 24 Sep 2007 07:00:03 -0700 Content-class: >>>>>>>>> urn:content-classes:message Subject: Test >>>>>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>>>>>>> Content-Type: multipart/related; >>>>>>>>>
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7FEB3.36A50E35"; >>>>>>>>> type="multipart/alternative" >>>>>>>>> Disposition-Notification-To: "John Doe" >>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:00:09 -0400 >>>>>>>>> Message-ID: >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thread-Topic: Test >>>>>>>>> Thread-Index:
Acf+sze/uFrU/XkRTWC8Ygo5DOjbXA== >>>>>>>>> From: "John Doe"
>>>>>>>>> To:
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 7270 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is this correct? What could be causing the
IP change when mail >>>>>>>>> is being sent? I would appreciate any help. >>>>>>>>> I'm having issues that I really need to get
fixed. >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> DAIUTO
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: autodiscover.domain.com help
Date:
10/08/2007 18:55:45
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:40:14 -0000, ScottG wrote:
>> Outlook 2007 and Exchange 2007 are designed to
work together so your >> Outlook knows what it's doing. It's just a sod
that it's not doing >> what you want it to :) >> Just interested though. What changed? > >Nothing has changed. I know they are suppose to work
together, but I >am not using Exchange 2007 so the autodiscover
should not even be an >option.
So if you create a DNS entry for
autodiscover.yoursmtpdomain in your internal DNS, does the prompt go away?
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Blackberry and Exchange 2007
Date:
10/10/2007 07:54:35
If your EVS fails over, you have to restart your BES
services.
Once the BES server loses access to whatever Exchange
Mailbox server, it
will stop working, even if that Exchange server comes
back online (in your
case cluster failover).
Oliver
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Blackberry and Exchange 2007
Date:
10/09/2007 18:25:06
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:58:42 -0700, "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
>Are you running Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES)?
If so, it's my
>understanding that BES uses MAPI, which would be
connecting to the mailbox
>role server (back-end). I'd guess that what you're
seeing is that the
>failover breaks the MAPI connection, and the BES
probably doesn't reconnect
>gracefully.
And most BES issues can be "resolved" by restarting
the BES services.
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Blackberry and Exchange 2007
Date:
10/09/2007 17:58:42
Are you running Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES)?
If so, it's my
understanding that BES uses MAPI, which would be
connecting to the mailbox
role server (back-end). I'd guess that what you're
seeing is that the
failover breaks the MAPI connection, and the BES
probably doesn't reconnect
gracefully. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Sabo, Eric" wrote in message
news:uNmPjKsCIHA.3848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Everytime our backend mailbox server that is
running Exchange 2007 gets
> transfers from one node to another node, the
blackberry loses connection
> to the mailbox, I think it connects via IMAP
through one of our CAS
> front-end server. Downtime when the mailbox
resource switches from one
> node to another node is less than 4 minutes. What
is cause the
> blackberry device to lose connectivity and has to
always be reset? > > In anyone thinks this is a cluster exchange I have
no problem post this in
> there. > > Thanks in advance! > Eric Sabo >
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: BlackBerry not receiving some emails
Date:
10/10/2007 14:36:54
I would start by contacting Blackberry technical
support. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"mohaaron" wrote in message
news:1192043012.956057.15520@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > We are using Exchange with the BES server and
recently some of our > BlackBerry clients stopped receiving all of their
email, meaning that > out of 10 emails received in Outlook only about
half of them show up > in their BlackBerry. Does anyone have any idea why
this might be > happening? I know only a little about Exchange and
less about the > BlackBerry Server so any help would be greatly
appreciated. >
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Can anyone with trusted domain set up experience share ?
Date:
10/09/2007 16:55:40
Make sure the following are true: 1. Ensure that the Domain A account has Full Mailbox
Access right in
Mailbox Rights for the user in Domain B. 2. If the Domain B user account is disabled, make
sure that the Domain A
account has Associated External Account right in
Mailbox Rights for the user
in Domain B. 3. Ensure that the Domain A account has Send As right
on the Domain B user
account. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"John" wrote in message
news:82D43228-62DC-44EF-B957-33D1E9B9B96B@microsoft.com... > Hi all, > > I set up two way external trust between these two
seperate domains A ? > B(in > two seperate forests and functional level in
windows 2000 native) and also
> I > associate an exchange 2000 mailboxes according to
KB278888. After > configuring the outlook, the password screen kept
poped up. Now, I close
> the > outlook, it still asks me about the username,
password and domain. I could > not log on. > > Is there any extra step I need to allow the trusted
user in > domain A to access the assoicated mailbox in domain
B through outlook?
> Can > anyone with trusted domain users set up experience
share? I am totally
> out > of mind now. > > Thank you very much.
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: can I move virtual network name account
Date:
10/10/2007 14:30:44
I've never heard of any problems with moving computer
accounts between OUs,
so I'd suggest that you give it a try. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Chris" wrote in message
news:9F9A1A9B-077C-4F7E-9A3C-F8F52856D71F@microsoft.com... >I have a A/P Exchane 2003 cluster. Both were created
in the proper OU but > the server cluster virtual network account was
created in Computers OU.
> Can > I move it to another OU? Will it impact the
cluster? Can I move it with > both nodes and Exchange running? > > Thanks. > > David
From:
Alexander Zammit [MVP] <alex@respond_to_group>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Can't export with EXMERGE, said Fatal error but can't see any in log
Date:
10/06/2007 04:23:31
Check your configuration against this:
http://www.exchangeinbox.com/articles/024/exmergesetup.htm
--
Alexander Zammit WinDeveloper Software IMF Tune - Unleash the Full Intelligent Message
Filter Power http://www.windeveloper.com/imftune/
"Smiley" wrote in message
news:fe5v2m$69i$2$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk... > Hi, > > SBS 2003 sp1 > Tried Exmerge to export message from a user's
mailbox before removing,
> Popup said operation completed but encountered
error, consult exmerge log.
> I can't see anything which give me an idea on what
was the error. Tried on
> number of user's mailbox, same error. Have enclosed
the log > > [19:10:28] Logging Level: None > [19:10:28] Reading settings from file 'C:\Program
> Files\Exchsrvr\bin\EXMERGE.INI'. > [19:10:28] Reading list of subjects for messages to
be selected from file
> '' > [19:10:28] Reading list of attachment names for
messages to be selected
> from file '' > [19:10:28] List of folders to be ignored has been
read. 0 folders in the
> list. > [19:10:28] Current machine locale ID is 0x809 > [19:10:28] Operating System Version 5.2 (Build
3790) > [19:10:44] Accessing Domain Controller 'SERVER' > [19:10:44] 'SERVER' is running Exchange Server 2000
or later > [19:10:44] Mailbox '/o=aaa/ou=first administrative
> group/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=SERVER/cn=Microsoft
System Attendant'
> will be ignored as its DN contains strings in the
ignore list > [19:10:44] Mailbox '/o=aaa/ou=first administrative
> group/cn=Configuration/cn=Connections/cn=SMTP
> (SERVER)/cn={54ED5795-9550-40A4-B217-4C4B3C941CDF}'
will be ignored as its
> DN contains strings in the ignore list > [19:10:45] Mailbox '/o=aaa/ou=first administrative
> group/cn=Recipients/cn=SystemMailbox{54ED5795-9550-40A4-B217-4C4B3C941CDF}'
> will be ignored as its DN contains strings in the
ignore list > [19:10:45] Found 19 mailbox(es) homed on database
'FIRST STORAGE
> GROUP/MAILBOX STORE (SERVER)'. > [19:10:45] Ignored 3 mailbox(es) homed on database
'FIRST STORAGE
> GROUP/MAILBOX STORE (SERVER)'. > [19:10:45] Found 19 mailbox(es) homed on the
specified databases. > [19:10:45] Ignored 3 mailbox(es) homed on the
specified databases. > [19:11:33] Using attribute
'PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME' for date operations. > [19:11:33] Merging data into target store. The
program will copy only
> those messages that do not exist in the target
store. > [19:11:33] Associated folder data will NOT be
copied to the target store. > [19:11:33] Using 'English (Britain)' (0x809) as the
default locale (Code
> page 1252) > [19:11:33] All mailboxes will be processed,
regardless of locale > [19:11:33] Using default locale for all mailboxes > [19:11:34] Initializing worker thread (Thread0) > [19:11:34] Copying data from mailbox 'aa bbb'
('AA.BBB') on Server
> 'SERVER' to file 'L:\AA.BBB.PST'. > [19:11:34] Error opening message store (MSEMS).
Verify that the Microsoft
> Exchange Information Store service is running and
that you have the
> correct permissions to log on. (0x8004011d) > [19:11:34] Errors encountered. Copy process aborted
for mailbox 'aa bbb'
> ('AA.BBB'). > [19:11:34] Number of items copied from the source
store for all mailboxes
> processed: 0 > [19:11:34] Total number of folders processed in the
source store: 0 > [19:11:34] 0 mailboxes successfully processed. > > Anyone has any idea what I might have gone wrong ?
the user EXMERGE has
> all the permission able to be set in the security. > > > HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP >
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Can't open Outlook 2003
Date:
10/10/2007 10:57:32
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:46:07 -0400, "paul-julie
knoxville" wrote:
>I want to configure Outlook for email other than on
an Exchange Server.
>Unfortunately, it won't open because it can't
connect to the Exchange
>Server. How can I tell it to stop looking for the
server so as to
>reconfigure it??
>
Command Line switches are pretty extensive with
Outlook. I like to simply start outlook with either the
/firstrun switch or /profile ( and can create a new one on the
fly)
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Can't open Outlook 2003
Date:
10/10/2007 07:52:46
Control Panel | Mail
Oliver
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: cannot Delete message in Junk mail folder
Date:
10/09/2007 12:13:38
Outlook Web Access. But a better answer is to stop
backing up individual
mailboxes, i.e., stop doing brick backups, and back
up only the Information
Store object. Set your deleted item recovery and
deleted mailbox recovery
periods to a long enough period so you don't have to
restore mailboxes. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"woody" wrote in message
news:43C7F1E8-E00F-4DF9-B617-B88BF2AB6E0E@microsoft.com... > please forgive my ignorance but what is OWA > > "Martina" wrote: > >> Log on to OWA and check if you can delete the mail
there. >> >> -- >> Martina >> >> >> >> "PolarBear" wrote in message >>
news:020CFA40-D8F0-4378-8FC2-A1F6B18C6541@microsoft.com... >> > We are using Exchange 2003 and Veritas backup
exec to back up exchange. >> > I had an email in my Junk email folder that were
corrupt files and as a >> > result there was on error message on the backup
log. >> > >> > So I set my Junk folder to delete automatically
and not save any
>> > message >> > in >> > junk folder. My folder is empy when viewed
through outlook. >> > >> > The next day my backup showed the same message
rederencing the same
>> > email >> > message that I thought was deleted. >> > >> > So, using Veritas backup exec I thought I could
correct this problem by >> > not >> > including my junk folder in the daily backup.
Still get the error
>> > message >> > in >> > my back up log. >> > >> > When I drill down using Veritas backup and go to
the information store
>> > and >> > my junk mail forder this corrupt mesage still
appears as a file
>> > available >> > for >> > backup even though it is not visibe in my
outlook junk mail folder. >> > >> > How can I delete this file? >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Polar Bear >> >>
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Cannot open PST created by ExMerge
Date:
10/05/2007 15:44:49
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:12:30 +0200, "M. Ali Qureshi" wrote:
>Mails are nomore on the server mailbox. i choosed
"archive" option in
>ExMerge.
Is it stil within the deleted item retention time? If
so, then they should still be recoverable. Google for
DumpsterAlwaysOn.
If using Exch 2003, use the Recovery Storage Group
otherwise. > >I do not have a brick level backup, only full
database backup and there are
>alot of other users in the same databaser on server,
i would not like to
>restore all of it. > >Any other way to recover from this large PST?
spliting it in 2 with some 3rd
>party program? Any? > >Ali > >"Andy David {MVP}" wrote in message
>news:t2ccg3tkbkl53qqgeo4des5it5lrrhdkkk@4ax.com... >> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:24:00 +0200, "M. Ali
Qureshi" >> wrote: >> >>>Ok, that makes sense. Though this limitation from
MS doesnt! >>> >>>But is there any way of recovering data? or
spliting the file in 2 without >>>loosing mails? >> >> Best bet would be to re-run Exmerge against that
mailbox and filter on >> dates to make smaller psts. >> If that mailbox is already empty, and you will
have to recover those >> emails. >> >> >>> >>>Thanks >>> >>>Ali >>> >>>"Andy David {MVP}" wrote in
>>>message >>>news:jc5cg35e35f735m1bjp1035en2uaajjlkj@4ax.com... >>>> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:33:25 +0200, "M. Ali
Qureshi" >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Size is: 2063392KB (1.96GB) >>>>> >>>>>I am not sure what version of PST file is
created when we use Exmerge to >>>>>extract mails?!? >>>> >>>> Ansi >>>> >>>>> >>>>>I have tried to open it with outlook 2003 and
outlook 2007 without any >>>>>luck. >>>> >>>> That is very close, actually really over the
limit an ansi pst can be. >>>> 1.8GB is about as large as they can go. Thats
probably what caused >>>> the corruptoin. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Regards >>>>> >>>>>Ali >>>>> >>>>>"Susan" wrote in message >>>>>news:uNnHpmpBIHA.2004@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>>>> how large is it? what version is the pst file?
what version Outlook? >>>>>> version mismatch? >>>>>> >>>>>> --
>>>>>> Susan Conkey [MVP] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "M. Ali Qureshi" wrote in message >>>>>>
news:9E133C05-4BCA-408F-B824-F587606253A5@microsoft.com... >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I used exmerge to extract mails from a
mailbox using "archive"
>>>>>>> function >>>>>>> so they get deleted on the server. The
process went ok with a few
>>>>>>> "non >>>>>>> fatal errors". I used the date range to
extract all mails from
>>>>>>> january >>>>>>> 2002 to december 2005. But i cannot open the
PST file created by >>>>>>> exmerge. >>>>>>> I get an error saying that i should run
scanpst utility to fix
>>>>>>> errors. >>>>>>> When i try the utility, it also crashes with
an error. I am unable to >>>>>>> import mails from this PST into outlook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any suggestions? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MAQ >>>>>> >>>>>>
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Cannot open PST created by ExMerge
Date:
10/05/2007 07:40:49
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:24:00 +0200, "M. Ali Qureshi" wrote:
>Ok, that makes sense. Though this limitation from MS
doesnt! > >But is there any way of recovering data? or spliting
the file in 2 without
>loosing mails?
Best bet would be to re-run Exmerge against that
mailbox and filter on dates to make smaller psts. If that mailbox is already empty, and you will have
to recover those emails.
> >Thanks > >Ali > >"Andy David {MVP}" wrote in message
>news:jc5cg35e35f735m1bjp1035en2uaajjlkj@4ax.com... >> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:33:25 +0200, "M. Ali
Qureshi" >> wrote: >> >>>Size is: 2063392KB (1.96GB) >>> >>>I am not sure what version of PST file is created
when we use Exmerge to >>>extract mails?!? >> >> Ansi >> >>> >>>I have tried to open it with outlook 2003 and
outlook 2007 without any
>>>luck. >> >> That is very close, actually really over the limit
an ansi pst can be. >> 1.8GB is about as large as they can go. Thats
probably what caused >> the corruptoin. >> >> >>> >>>Regards >>> >>>Ali >>> >>>"Susan" wrote in message >>>news:uNnHpmpBIHA.2004@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>> how large is it? what version is the pst file?
what version Outlook? >>>> version mismatch? >>>> >>>> --
>>>> Susan Conkey [MVP] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "M. Ali Qureshi" wrote in message >>>>
news:9E133C05-4BCA-408F-B824-F587606253A5@microsoft.com... >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I used exmerge to extract mails from a mailbox
using "archive" function >>>>> so they get deleted on the server. The process
went ok with a few "non >>>>> fatal errors". I used the date range to extract
all mails from january >>>>> 2002 to december 2005. But i cannot open the
PST file created by
>>>>> exmerge. >>>>> I get an error saying that i should run scanpst
utility to fix errors. >>>>> When i try the utility, it also crashes with an
error. I am unable to >>>>> import mails from this PST into outlook. >>>>> >>>>> Any suggestions? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>> >>>>> MAQ >>>> >>>>
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Cannot open PST created by ExMerge
Date:
10/05/2007 05:45:51
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:33:25 +0200, "M. Ali Qureshi" wrote:
>Size is: 2063392KB (1.96GB) > >I am not sure what version of PST file is created
when we use Exmerge to >extract mails?!?
Ansi
> >I have tried to open it with outlook 2003 and
outlook 2007 without any luck.
That is very close, actually really over the limit an
ansi pst can be. 1.8GB is about as large as they can go. Thats
probably what caused the corruptoin.
> >Regards > >Ali > >"Susan" wrote in message
>news:uNnHpmpBIHA.2004@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> how large is it? what version is the pst file?
what version Outlook?
>> version mismatch? >> >> --
>> Susan Conkey [MVP] >> >> >> >> "M. Ali Qureshi" wrote in message
>>
news:9E133C05-4BCA-408F-B824-F587606253A5@microsoft.com... >>> Hi, >>> >>> I used exmerge to extract mails from a mailbox
using "archive" function
>>> so they get deleted on the server. The process
went ok with a few "non
>>> fatal errors". I used the date range to extract
all mails from january
>>> 2002 to december 2005. But i cannot open the PST
file created by exmerge.
>>> I get an error saying that i should run scanpst
utility to fix errors.
>>> When i try the utility, it also crashes with an
error. I am unable to
>>> import mails from this PST into outlook. >>> >>> Any suggestions? >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> MAQ >> >>
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Chage password with 2007 OWA and 2003 backend
Date:
10/09/2007 16:50:52
Your Exchange 2003 users are getting OWA through the
CAS? I don't know if
there's a way to fix the problem there, but the
Exchange 2003 users could
get OWA through an Exchange 2003 front-end or their
back-end server. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Donavin" wrote in message
news:56C5AC77-DDCC-4C3C-8486-735B3C1A8562@microsoft.com... > After the Exchange 2007 upgrade has started (the
Exchange 2007 CAS server
> is > in place), users that remain on the Exchange 2003
backend cannot change
> their > password using OWA. The procedure for enabling
change password in
> Exchange > 2003 does not work since the registry keys
requested do not exist. How do
> I > enable the change password capability for a user
that remains on the
> Exhcange > 2003 backend server through OWA? >
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Change Sender Address
Date:
10/09/2007 04:36:31
Nothing out of the box can do this i'm afraid.
Check out IvaSoft ChooseFrom which will meet your
requirements.
Oliver
From:
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Change Sender Address
Date:
10/08/2007 21:29:26
Andy Wolsten wrote: > Hi All, > > We have several users who need to send as different
email addresses > on a regular basis. We are able to set the 'From'
field in outlook > to a differnet email address
Not to a bogus one, nor to an additional address in
their own mailbox, nor
to one assigned to an object on which they don't have
Send As rights....
> however Exchange 2003 seems to revert to > the primary address set in the user properties.
You can send only as the primary/default address. > > > Is there a way to implement this so that the
address is not modified, > and the user is able to send as the sender address
required?
Not really, if these addresses are part of the users'
mailboxes (as
aliases). See ChooseFrom at www.ivasoft.biz for an
option.
Otherwise, you can assign the additional addresses to
other mail-enabled
objects (mailboxes or distribution groups) and grant
the user Send As rights
to it ....then they can use the From field.
Yep, it's all pretty clumsy.
From:
John Oliver, Jr. [MVP] <jcoliverjr@hotmail.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: clearing the queue
Date:
10/09/2007 11:38:41
What version of Exchange? If Exchange 2003, enable
Recipient Filtering. To
clear Queues,
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/886208
--
John Oliver, Jr MCSE, MCT, CCNA Exchange MVP 2007 Microsoft Certified Partner
"Terri" wrote in message
news:13gmu9pj14g6i71@corp.supernews.com... >I am really new to this so any help would be greatly
appreciated. My mail
>server has 1165 queues with most of them holding
only one email. Is there a
>way to clear that out? Most of it looks like junk. >
From:
Bharat Suneja [MVP] <bharat@nospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Control of OWA options
Date:
10/09/2007 19:33:07
Fairly certain this level of granular control isn't
available. There are
plenty of other options available using
Set-CASMailbox to granularly allow
or "remove" certain features like deleted item
recovery, mobile device mgmt,
etc.
--
Bharat Suneja MVP - Exchange www.zenprise.com NEW blog location: exchangepedia.com/blog ----------------------------------------------
"supersonic_oasis" wrote in
message
news:D3BB4074-EA33-4344-BCC6-430047BFF49F@microsoft.com... > Hi all, > > We are running exchange 2007. When someone is
logged into OWA, and they > click on Options, there is an option to choose the
"Number of items to > display per page." The users can choose from 5 to
100. My boss has asked
> me > if it is possible to increase this number to 200. > > Is there a way? > > Robert
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: creating SG and Store quickly
Date:
10/05/2007 21:31:03
Chris wrote:
>I have tried this script. It cretes SG but put
transaction logs in a default
>location on C:. I need to put it on D:.
Use the force!
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms876490.aspx
--
Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: creating SG and Store quickly
Date:
10/05/2007 15:15:41
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:51:00 -0700, Chris wrote:
>Is there a way to create Storage groups and stores
quickly, maybe using a
>script? and add to system policy after that
automatically even better. This
>could be on a new server or on an existing
production server. We use the
>same SG and store names and location (drive) for all
servers. Manual workis
>slow and subject to inconsistance. > >Thanks.
This is in the Exchange Server cookbook which you
should own!!!! :-) http://techtasks.com/code/viewbookcode/1259
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Defrag Exchange 2003 DB to a Temp Drive?
Date:
10/09/2007 20:50:56
It moves it back. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Leythos" wrote in message
news:MPG.21759e02eb022759989a5e@adfree.Usenet.com... > In article , mark@mvps.org > says... >> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:43:03 -0400, Leythos wrote: >> >> >My understanding of the defrag is that I can use
/d /p /t"d: >> >\tempdfg.edb" defrag to a different drive, but it
leaves the defragged >> >DB on that temp space - I would have to copy it
back overtop of the non- >> >defragged file and name it the same as the source
file. >> > >> >What I really want to do is defrag it on a
different drive as a temp and >> >then have it automatically restore it on its own. >> > >> >Does that mean I could use the /d
/t"d:\tempdfg.edb" without the /p >> >option and it would use the D: drive and then
copy it back to the source >> >drive? >> > >> >I'm out of space on this server (we didn't spec
this) and they have 48GB >> >of store and 2GB free space. After deleting
several years worth of >> >emails from all users, it should end up around
7GB. >> > >> >Thanks >> >> No need for the /p. >> Do it to /t:d:\temp\defrag.edb though. > > I was thinking that was it, but I wasn't sure if it
would leave the > defragged database at the temp location (as the new
store) of it if > would copy the temp back to the source location.
I've read the docs > three ways to Sunday and didn't get a definitive
answer. > > Thanks for the info. > > --
> > Leythos > - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum. > - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker"
is like calling a > drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist" > spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email
address)
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Degrag Exchange 2003 DB to a Temp Drive?
Date:
10/10/2007 06:40:28
> it, but I wanted to defrag it because it makes me
feel better about it.
Just make sure you have space to reclaim - check your
App Log for Event 1221
Oliver
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Degrag Exchange 2003 DB to a Temp Drive?
Date:
10/09/2007 12:52:32
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:43:03 -0400, Leythos wrote:
>My understanding of the defrag is that I can use /d
/p /t"d: >\tempdfg.edb" defrag to a different drive, but it
leaves the defragged
>DB on that temp space - I would have to copy it back
overtop of the non- >defragged file and name it the same as the source
file. > >What I really want to do is defrag it on a different
drive as a temp and
>then have it automatically restore it on its own. > >Does that mean I could use the /d /t"d:\tempdfg.edb"
without the /p
>option and it would use the D: drive and then copy
it back to the source
>drive? > >I'm out of space on this server (we didn't spec
this) and they have 48GB
>of store and 2GB free space. After deleting several
years worth of
>emails from all users, it should end up around 7GB. > >Thanks
No need for the /p. Do it to /t:d:\temp\defrag.edb though Post your questions, comments, feedbacks and suggestions Related Topics |
|
|
|
|
This web is provided "AS IS" with no warranties.
Copyright © 2002-2009
ChicagoTech.net,
All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction forbidden.