Home | Site Map | Cisco How To | Net How To | Wireless | Search | Forums | Services | Donations | Careers | About Us | Contact Us|
|
|
Home | Site Map | Cisco How To | Net How To | Wireless | Search | Forums | Services | Donations | Careers | About Us | Contact Us| |
|
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: email delivery failing
Date:
mvlbv wrote:
>On Oct 4, > wrote: >> mvlbv wrote: >> >> >I've been noticing emails starting to bounce back
from hotmail and aol >> >with a refuse (Action: failed >> >Status: 5.7.1 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.7.1
Requested action not >> >taken: message refused) >> >> Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see any
of those messages >> being rejected. Each status is a 2xx. >> >> Since each of the RCPT TO command is /to/ your
domain, and your SMTP >> log shows them being received by your server, why
would you think >> they're being rejected by hotmail or aol? Both of
those ISP are >> sending the messages, not receiving them. >> >> -- >> Rich Matheisen >> MCSE+I, Exchange MVP >> MS Exchange FAQ
athttp://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.p...@getronics.com >> Or to these, either: mailto:h.p...@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuc...@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuc...@pinkroccade.com > >the interesting thing is that aol is working now but
hotmail is still >failing. I just got a few new complaints of other
customers getting >bounce backs when trying to email me. Where else
could I look for the >reason of the refuse?
The first place is to find out what the NDR they
receive has to say. If that doesn't help, then move to the SMTP Protocol
Log, but look for status codes in the 5xx range. Those are permanent
failures. If you don't find them, do you find any 4xx status codes?
Are there any devices or software between your
Internet connection and your Exchange server's SMTP Virtual Server? Are you
grey listing? Using DNS RBLs? Blacklisting?
If you don't find anything like the above, start
checking for timeouts in the SMTP Protocol Log. Disconnections might be
involved, too. Do you see complete SMTP transactions, or are they
stopping after, say, the MAIL FROM command (or the RCPT TO command)? You
may need a network monitor to work with these.
--
Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Ex2k3 with OWA as FE talking to BE Server with DMZ - Advice Please
Date:
Hi,
It really is as simple as it looks to have a FE/BE
scenario.
If you aren't using ISA or another reverse proxy
application then yes, just
443 open on your firewall pointing to your FE.
Have all inbound SMTP traffic also come to the FE,
this will allow you to
lock down the BE more, advice for this can be given
from ExBPA
Oliver
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: exactly same problem
Date:
joachim.jordan@akdae.de wrote:
>On > wrote: > >> > I set it to 220 but, JUST did it, so don't have
any results >> > yet. I also am restarting SMTP nightly just in
case. >> >> Good. >> > >Foreword: [Same Problem - Thankyou for this
excellent information >page!!!] > >My Question: >I there anybody who can tell me what the best
setting for the "glitch" >entry is? I've heard 60, 120, 220... Does anybody
has results?
The answer is "not too short, and not too long". Too
short and the greylisting server will just sent another 4xx status.
Too long and you'll start to create a performance problem on your
server.
The interval at which you retry depends on the
greyliting servers you deal with, not something on your server.
--
Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2000 and Web outlook
Date:
You must install Exchange 2000 on the IIS 6.0 server,
and you probably want
to configure it as a front-end server. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"VICK" wrote in message
news:O$fGsVpCIHA.4912@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > My question is >> > How would I configure Windows 2003 IIS 6.0 to
connect to Exchange 2000 in
> a separated servers >
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2003 error
Date:
Anything is possible. ISINTEG is relatively safe
compared to repairing with
ESEUTIL. Take a full backup first. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
wrote in message
news:1192039223.345417.6460@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 9, > wrote: >> On >> >On Oct 9, >> >> I suspect that the move mailbox is a symptom of
the problem and not
>> >> the >> >> cause. It appears that you have mailbox
corruption. You could do as
>> >> the >> >> first message suggests and run: >> >> >> ISINTEG -fix -alltests >> >> >> repeatedly until it returns no errors. You
might, however, want to
>> >> invest >> >> in the cost of a support call to Microsoft PSS
and let them hold your
>> >> hand >> >> and walk you through a repair or restoration
process. >> >> -- >> >> Ed Crowley >> >> MVP - Exchange >> >> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick
backups!" >> >> >Do you run this with exchange off line or online
and how many times >> >should it be run? If more than 1 mailbox is
corrupt is it possible i >> >would need to run that statement up to 10 times ? >> >> Store has to be dismounted. >> You run it until it gets no errors. Typically
takes 3-4 times. > > Is it possible that that will never fix the problem
? What is my worst > case ? >
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2003 error
Date:
On
>On Oct 9, >> I suspect that the move mailbox is a symptom of
the problem and not the >> cause. It appears that you have mailbox
corruption. You could do as the >> first message suggests and run: >> >> ISINTEG -fix -alltests >> >> repeatedly until it returns no errors. You might,
however, want to invest >> in the cost of a support call to Microsoft PSS and
let them hold your hand >> and walk you through a repair or restoration
process. >> -- >> Ed Crowley >> MVP - Exchange >> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick
backups!" > >Do you run this with exchange off line or online and
how many times >should it be run? If more than 1 mailbox is corrupt
is it possible i >would need to run that statement up to 10 times ?
Store has to be dismounted. You run it until it gets no errors. Typically takes
3-4 times.
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2003 error
Date:
> What would cause exchange to crash in the middle of
the move?
Without seeing your Event Logs and what your mem/cpu
utilizations are I
could not say - far to vague - could be a multitude
of things.
If you have any decent Event Logs feel free to paste
them here so we may
possibly be able to help you identify root cause.
Oliver
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2003 error
Date:
You should not have corrupt mailboxes if this kind of
issue happens.
The mailbox will still be on the original Exchange
Server and AD will
reflect that the users mailboxes point here.
The Exchange Server you did the move mailbox to will
have an incomplete
mailbox though, however when you re-run the move
mailbox wizard the wizard
will identify this and delete the partial mailboxes.
You will then have to
re-run the wizard again to restart the move mailbox
function.
Oliver
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2003 Server - Recommended Size Limits
Date:
On wrote:
>Is there a recommended size limit for the
Information Store and mailboxes >for Exchange Server 2003? > >We have about 65 mailboxes and an 80gb hard drive
that the Information >Store resides on. > >The Private Information Store is currently about
30gb. > >The owners of our company would like to enforce size
limits. > >Thanks,
Why do you want to enforce limits? If you enforce
limits what are the users going to do with the email they can't bring
themselves to delete? Users are all the same, they love to keep
stuff and if you won't let them store it in Exchange they'll just use
PST files. If they use PST files they'll either keep them on the PC
and blame you when they screw up or they'll keep them on the file
server and blow your storage sky high.
Anyway the answer to your question is that your limit
is 75GB in Standard Edition which I'm guessing is what you have.
65 users and 75GB of mail isn't a bad number to work to.
Not terribly keen about the hard drive though.
Backups, resiliency, protection on that?
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2003: One user getting No transport provider was available for
delivery to this several times a day
Date:
Is this internittent or is it repeatable with replies
to the same
message(s)? Was this user migrated from a different
Exchange system? --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"KingCronos" wrote in message
news:1192011696.987451.15650@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com... > On 9 Oct, >> Repeating: >> >> The place to start is to find out how this user is
addressing the e-mail >> messages in question. >> -- >> Ed Crowley >> MVP - Exchange >> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick
backups!" >> >> "KingCronos" wrote in message >> >>
news:1191921479.984995.61480@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> > Hi, >> >> > The mail profile is correct. We run a locked
down Citrix system. Also, >> > often the user gets the problem even when she
just replies to a >> > message she has received. >> >> > Any ideas? >> >> > Thanks >> >> > On 8 Oct, >> >> The place to start is to find out . Another
thing to look at is how
>> >> the Outlook >> >> profile >> >> is configured. >> >> -- >> >> Ed Crowley >> >> MVP - Exchange >> >> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick
backups!" >> >> >> "KingCronos" wrote in message >> >>
>>news:1191860083.635576.290280@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> > We run Exchange 2003 in a WIndows 2000
domain. Most of our clients >> >> > (including the problem user) use citrix, so
the setup for
>> >> > individuals >> >> > has little variation on basics such as
Outlook 2003. One user >> >> > continually has problems sending out and
several times a day >> >> > (sometimes much more), she is prevented from
sending emails with >> >> > the error: >> >> >> > The following recipient(s) could not be
reached: >> >> >> > John Doe on >> >> > No transport provider was available for
delivery to this >> >> > recipient. >> >> >> > I looked up the 'no transport' issue on
Microsoft KB, and nothing
>> >> > was >> >> > really applicable except I thought problem
contacts, but then the >> >> > user >> >> > told me that the last four times she received
these NDRS, all she
>> >> > had >> >> > done was replied to messages that had been
sent to her. The user can >> >> > usually re send the messages successfully
later on in the day. >> >> >> > One thing I should also mention is that she
is a remote user BUT,
>> >> > she >> >> > uses a DSL connection to get to her Citrix
session, and therefore
>> >> > all >> >> > software and network connections are
preferably running in the main >> >> > office. >> >> >> > Thanks in advance, C- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Im not sure what you mean by "how this user is
addressing the e-mail > messages in question". On occasion she merely hits
the reply button > after reading an email she has received, so the
address was the same > as from where it was received, but the error still
comes sporadically. >
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 - Fail to apply search optimization
Date:
On
>Thank you for the reply but I have already searched
the Microsoft >Knowledge base. None of the articles in your link
apply to this >error. > >If you'll notice the Event Log detail I posted,
you'll see that Event >ID contains another error code. I cannot find any
information on the >internal error 1162. That is why I'm posting here.
Running Isinteg in fix mode would probably fix those
errors.
> > > > >On Oct 4, >> Hello, >> >> I'm getting an error on my Exchange 2007
repeatedly. I'd like to get >> this error corrected. The only solution I have
found in my searching >> is to ignore the error. Any advice is appreciated.
Here is the Event >> Log entry: >> >> Event Type: Warning >> Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store >> Event Category: General >> Event ID: 1025 >> >> Time: >> User: N/A >> Computer: GEMINI >> Description: >> An error occurred on database "First Storage
Group\Mailbox Database". >> Function name or description of problem:
Restrict/SetSearchCriteria >> Error: 1162 Warning: fail to apply search
optimization to folder (FID >> 6-3611F4) Retrying without optimization. >
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 direct file access security hole!
Date:
I haven't found a support call on this one and it
does still happen on an SP1 box and a 64bit one at that so it's not just a
lab based anomoly. I'd raise a formal support call in the meantime.
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 direct file access security hole!
Date:
On wrote:
>Share Permissions are all users full. it seems that
you are telling me that I
>need to start managing the shar permissions as well. > Share permissions shouldn't be Everyone - Full.
Permissions like that will obviously allow anyone to browse into the share
regardless of any problems you've found (and there is a
problem)........ Mind you, that's not the problem though. See my
thread.
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 direct file access security hole!
Date:
On wrote:
>On > wrote: > >>I have set up a new exchange 2007 server and
removed all other exchange
>>servers. configured direct file access to one of
our file servers. when a
>>user puts in \\, they see a list of shares (
including hidden
>>ones) then they can browse these shares well below
the point where ntfs
>>permissions do not allow. while they cannot open
documents in these folders,
>>this does not comply with what I would expect. also
I saw that this can be
>>controlled by user, can I configure that some users
have access to one server
>>while others have access to another?
> >I had a completely vanilla install just made up on
2003 and although I >can see dollar shares (bad) so long as the
permissions on the share >are correct (i.e. I made sure the default everyone -
read was removed >and only a different account to mine was given read
access) the user >on OWA can't get in. >So on first glance it only looks half as dodgy as
you make out. It's >still bad though.......
Yeah, and browsing down to a folder I don't have
permission to does let me list the contents of that folder but won't let
me open any files within it.
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 direct file access security hole!
Date:
On wrote:
>On > wrote: > >>I have set up a new exchange 2007 server and
removed all other exchange
>>servers. configured direct file access to one of
our file servers. when a
>>user puts in \\, they see a list of shares (
including hidden
>>ones) then they can browse these shares well below
the point where ntfs
>>permissions do not allow. while they cannot open
documents in these folders,
>>this does not comply with what I would expect. also
I saw that this can be
>>controlled by user, can I configure that some users
have access to one server
>>while others have access to another?
> >I had a completely vanilla install just made up on
2003 and although I >can see dollar shares (bad) so long as the
permissions on the share >are correct (i.e. I made sure the default everyone -
read was removed >and only a different account to mine was given read
access) the user >on OWA can't get in. >So on first glance it only looks half as dodgy as
you make out. It's >still bad though.......
Yea, sounds great, but I am not completely sold on it
yet. The Sharepoint integration doesn't make it apparent
that its a read-only access as well. Only when you try to save a
modified doc does that become obvious.
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 direct file access security hole!
Date:
On wrote:
>I have set up a new exchange 2007 server and removed
all other exchange
>servers. configured direct file access to one of our
file servers. when a
>user puts in \\, they see a list of shares (
including hidden
>ones) then they can browse these shares well below
the point where ntfs
>permissions do not allow. while they cannot open
documents in these folders,
>this does not comply with what I would expect. also
I saw that this can be
>controlled by user, can I configure that some users
have access to one server
>while others have access to another?
I had a completely vanilla install just made up on
2003 and although I can see dollar shares (bad) so long as the
permissions on the share are correct (i.e. I made sure the default everyone -
read was removed and only a different account to mine was given read
access) the user on OWA can't get in. So on first glance it only looks half as dodgy as you
make out. It's still bad though.......
From:
Bharat Suneja [MVP] <bharat@nospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 Max Send/Receive issues
Date:
Exchange Server 2007: Setting Message Size Limits
http://exchangepedia.com/blog/2007/09/exchange-server-2007-setting-message_10.html
--
Bharat Suneja MVP - Exchange www.zenprise.com NEW blog location: exchangepedia.com/blog ----------------------------------------------
"Jimmy" wrote in message
news:fe5o2t$2eho$1@energise.enta.net... > Hi, > > I have an issue with a user's mailbox rejecting
emails with "large"
> attachements in Exchange 2007 e.g Msg Size greater
than allowed by Remote
> Host. > > Using both the Exchange management console and the
powershell, I have
> adjusted the mailbox limits to allow messages upto
100mb, however the
> server is still rejecting large mail. > > Using the "get-transportconfig" CMDlet both Max
Receive and Max Send are
> set to 100mb > get-receiveconnector | list shows max message size
of 100mb > get-transportserver | list > > For user limits: > get-mailbox -identity "user" | list shows the
correct size for this user
> eg 100mb > > Within the management console - server config - Hub
transport I have no
> options to change the receive connector as I am not
running sp1 beta. > Message size restrictions have been set within
recipient configuration. > > I must be missing something somewhere but I am
unable to see any other
> options within the management console to change. I
am not sure if this
> could be caused by a group mailbox setting pehaps? > > Any assistance would be appreciated. > > Thank you. > > > > >
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 Owa certificate issues
Date:
Exchange 2007 automatically issues certs, so you will
have to import the
certs into external, non domain joined clients.
An ideal route is to purchase a cert from a Trusted
Root, like Thawte,
Verisign, GoDaddy etc.
RPC over HTTPs and indeed OA will not function unless
the certificate is
valid - if it is not a trusted root ensure the cert
is installed on the
client machine. A guide on installing the cert to a
non domain joined client
machine here:
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/sag_cmprocsimport.mspx?mfr=true
Again, a trusted root does not need this extra step.
Oliver
"giasal" wrote in message
news:E2D773F6-91B9-4E83-B2C4-6D2AEDE22634@microsoft.com... >I am configuring owa SSL access with exchange 2007,
i'd like that the > certificate of server will be trust in standard CA
path. how can
> "integrate" > certificate server in client for direct access? > > Thanks in advance
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 OWA file access
Date:
"Jan Matejka" wrote:
>Hello, >Exchange 2007 Ent. >I have OWA accessible by integrated authentication
from internal side and
>form-based from external side. >When I logon by Form-Based from External, I am able
to open file share
>perfectly according file access OWA configuration.. >When I want to do that from internal side
(integrated authentication), I
>receive information I do not have permission to open
this path.
>(Authentication was not successfull)?!?! When I use
SAME link from favorite
>links, I receive similar information that I do not
have permission and
>recommendation to open this link to click here:
\\filepath\share. When I
>click this link, I open share?!?! > >Dou you know what does it mean? Why file access is
different when
>authentication is integrated? > >Thank you very much. Try it:-)
When you use basic authentication the user name and
password are in the possession of the program and it's able to pass
those credentials to whatever asks for them. when you use integrated
authentication you don't give your password to the program you only pass
a hash that the program uses to verify that your password is correct.
Becasue it's not in possession of your password it's not able to give
it to another entity -- so authentication fails.
This is really a Windows issue, not Exchange. Its
worked this way since, well, forever.
--
Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 rejecting POP
Date:
Please understand that when you send mail with a POP3
client you're sending
via SMTP. Have you configured your client to
authenticate the SMTP
connection? You would use the same format that you
use to authenticate the
POP3 connection. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"John Rocchio" wrote in message
news:OihLmcrCIHA.2280@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Hi All, > I've set up a new Exchange 2007 server and need to
enable POP3 access.
> Currently the end user can recieve their email but
cannot send. The error
> they get is: > > The rejected e-mail address was user@domain.com'.
Subject 'POP3 test',
> Account: 'mail.domain.net', Server:
'mail.domain.net', Protocol: SMTP,
> Server Response: '550 5.7.1 Unable to relay', Port:
25, Secure(SSL): No,
> Server Error: 550, Error Number: 0x800CCC79 > > I've tried all variations of authentication that I
can think of. (SPA,
> non SPA, plain text). The output from
get-popsettings returns the
> following: > > Name : 1 > ProtocolName : POP3 > MaxCommandSize : 40 > MessageRetrievalSortOrder : Descending > UnencryptedOrTLSBindings : {192.168.181.167:110} > SSLBindings : {192.168.181.167:995} > X509CertificateName : SERVER1 > Banner : Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 POP3
> service > ready > LoginType : PlainTextLogin > AuthenticatedConnectionTimeout : > PreAuthenticatedConnectionTimeout : > MaxConnections : 2000 > MaxConnectionFromSingleIP : 2000 > MaxConnectionsPerUser : 16 > MessageRetrievalMimeFormat : BestBodyFormat > ProxyTargetPort : 110 > CalendarItemRetrievalOption : iCalendar > OwaServerUrl : > MinAdminVersion : -2147453113 > AdminDisplayName : > ExchangeVersion : 0.1 (8.0.535.0) > DistinguishedName :
> CN=1,CN=POP3,CN=Protocols,CN=SERVER1,CN=Serv > ers,CN=Exchange Administrative Group
> (FYDIB > OHF23SPDLT),CN=Administrative
> Groups,CN=Domain,CN=Microsoft
>
Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=Domain,DC=internal > Identity : SERVER1\1 > Guid : bf5b72e4-7851-4d98-b17b-50fe7cfb9535 > ObjectCategory :
> domain.internal/Configuration/Schema/ms-E > xch-Protocol-Cfg-POP-Server > ObjectClass : {top, protocolCfg, protocolCfgPOP,
> protocol > CfgPOPServer} > WhenChanged : > WhenCreated : > OriginatingServer : dc1.domain.internal > IsValid : True > > Does anyone know what I am missing?
From:
Lee Derbyshire [MVP] <email a@t leederbyshire d.0.t c.0.m>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 rejecting POP
Date:
"John Rocchio" wrote in message
news:OihLmcrCIHA.2280@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Hi All, > I've set up a new Exchange 2007 server and need to
enable POP3 access.
> Currently the end user can recieve their email but
cannot send. The error
> they get is: > > The rejected e-mail address was user@domain.com'.
Subject 'POP3 test',
> Account: 'mail.domain.net', Server:
'mail.domain.net', Protocol: SMTP,
> Server Response: '550 5.7.1 Unable to relay', Port:
25, Secure(SSL): No,
> Server Error: 550, Error Number: 0x800CCC79 > > I've tried all variations of authentication that I
can think of. (SPA,
> non SPA, plain text). The output from
get-popsettings returns the
> following: > > Name : 1 > ProtocolName : POP3 > MaxCommandSize : 40 > MessageRetrievalSortOrder : Descending > UnencryptedOrTLSBindings : {192.168.181.167:110} > SSLBindings : {192.168.181.167:995} > X509CertificateName : SERVER1 > Banner : Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 POP3
> service > ready > LoginType : PlainTextLogin > AuthenticatedConnectionTimeout : > PreAuthenticatedConnectionTimeout : > MaxConnections : 2000 > MaxConnectionFromSingleIP : 2000 > MaxConnectionsPerUser : 16 > MessageRetrievalMimeFormat : BestBodyFormat > ProxyTargetPort : 110 > CalendarItemRetrievalOption : iCalendar > OwaServerUrl : > MinAdminVersion : -2147453113 > AdminDisplayName : > ExchangeVersion : 0.1 (8.0.535.0) > DistinguishedName :
> CN=1,CN=POP3,CN=Protocols,CN=SERVER1,CN=Serv > ers,CN=Exchange Administrative Group
> (FYDIB > OHF23SPDLT),CN=Administrative
> Groups,CN=Domain,CN=Microsoft
>
Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=Domain,DC=internal > Identity : SERVER1\1 > Guid : bf5b72e4-7851-4d98-b17b-50fe7cfb9535 > ObjectCategory :
> domain.internal/Configuration/Schema/ms-E > xch-Protocol-Cfg-POP-Server > ObjectClass : {top, protocolCfg, protocolCfgPOP,
> protocol > CfgPOPServer} > WhenChanged : > WhenCreated : > OriginatingServer : dc1.domain.internal > IsValid : True > > Does anyone know what I am missing?
Crap, pressed the wrong key. Tried to paste a link,
and ended up sending
the message.
Anyway...
This has nothing to do with POP, so don't spend any
more time tinkering with the POP settings, or things may get worse. POP is
only used to download mail from the server to the client. When it comes to
sending mail, yo uneed to look at SMTP settings.
This might help:
http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2007/mobility-client-access/using-pop3-imap4-access-exchange-2007-part1.html
Lee.
--
_______________________________________
Outlook Web Access for PDA, OWA For WAP: www.leederbyshire.com ________________________________________
From:
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP] <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange 2007 SP1 Beta 2 - UM 10 seconds Bug
Date:
What build version of SP1 Beta 2 are you using?
Oliver
From:
Bharat Suneja [MVP] <bharat@nospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: exchange not creating mailbox right away
Date:
Exchange-related attributes are created when
Recipient Policy is applied to
a new recipient. The actual mailbox is created in the Store when the
first message is
recevied for the recipient or the recipient logs on
using Outlook.
--
Bharat Suneja MVP - Exchange www.zenprise.com NEW blog location: exchangepedia.com/blog ----------------------------------------------
"James" wrote in message
news:BEA71FD5-9968-4CA2-886C-53BF5CF65A57@microsoft.com... > hello... when i create a new user in active
directory, i thought it used
> to > create an exchange mailbox for the user right away.
lately when i create a > user, it doesn't do that. for instance, i created a
new user this morning. > its been 6 hours now since i created it and i don't
have an email address
> for > the user. so in the email address tab, there's
nothing. > > is there a time interval that exchange goes and
creates these mailboxes? > like does it do it overnight or something?
From:
Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Exchange Server VM not accessible from machines other than host?
Date:
On wrote:
>On Oct 7, >> Have you looked this up on eventid.net? Check this
out:http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1333? >> -- >> Ed Crowley >> MVP - Exchange >> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick
backups!" > >Yes, checked that, and there was no password must be
changed checked >in AD. Followed the recommendations for 4083 too.
After my initial >post, I realized this was probably more a VM issue,
so I searched >around the VMware forums. I found lots of posts on
network >connectivity being dropped, with the only
recommendation to reboot the >VM, which I had done (actually three times). I then
logged back on >after reading that and lo and behold I had my
connectivity back. >Why? Dunno, wish I knew. > >Thanks- >Brian >
You're living on the edge no doubt.
Unsupported software installed on an unsupported
configuration :)
From:
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Export/Importing Contacts
Date:
DG wrote: > All of my top management have PDA's that sync
outlook via Microsoft > Push. It works great. Now I want to get the company
contacts (ie all > employees home and cell phones as well as picture)
to their PDA's. > > Here is what I did to accomplish this: > > I had our secretary enter all the employee's
information (home phone, > cell phone, work phone and picture) into a seperate > CompanyContacts.pst.
Why not a public contacts folder so everyone can see
the live/shared data in
Outlook?
> I then exported it to a file
Why? You already had in a PST, you said.....
> and imported it > into My contacts in outlook.
Don't import in Outlook. Copy/paste instead.
> Within minutes my PDA was updated. Pictures and
all. (It seems that I have
> to use PST format to get the > pictures to correctly export (is that correct?)).
No.....
> > The problem is that some managers like their
contacts to be Last > name First and others like First Name Last.
Do you mean the File As field? That's a per-item
thing. The default is Last,
First, and that makes the most sense to most people.
If you mean the display
order, that's somethng they each need to set in their
own Outlook or PDA. > > Is there a way in the Import or Export to tell how
to display the > name? I thought that when I imported if my outlook
options was set > to First Name Last then all the imports would be
that way. However, > they all came in Last Name, First. > > Any help would be great? > > DG
The problem with what you're doing is that your
management now has a static
copy of data that your company may wish to change
over time. This won't be a
very scalable or supportable method going forward. If
they want shared data,
use a public contacts folder, and to get that into
their PDAs, look into
www.diditbetter.com for Add2Exchange.
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Extension Attribute
Date:
"David Douglas" wrote:
>Try CSVDE to import CSV file into AD.
You can use CSVDE to create an object, but not to
modify one. LDIFDE is the tool to use for modifications.
--
Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Extension Attribute
Date:
>Hy, i need to modify extension attribute on some
hundreds of user, >i've try with admodify and adsiedit but i can only
clear this >attributes and not modify it... someone know how can
i modify it >without have to change it manually?
Use LDIFDE to make that modification -- or a VBS or
Perl script.
--
Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Extension Attribute
Date:
Please describe how you're trying to do this with
ADModify and ADSIEdit.
Either of these tools should allow you to modify
those attributes. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"
news:1191940490.966156.36830@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com... > Hy, i need to modify extension attribute on some
hundreds of user, > i've try with admodify and adsiedit but i can only
clear this > attributes and not modify it... someone know how
can i modify it > without have to change it manually? > Thanks >
From:
Alexander Zammit [MVP] <alex@respond_to_group>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: filter junkmail based on header
Date:
http://www.windeveloper.com/imftune/news/0923/openexchange.htm
--
Alexander Zammit WinDeveloper Software IMF Tune - Unleash the Full Intelligent Message
Filter Power http://www.windeveloper.com/imftune/
"Pete" wrote in message
news:7D436358-F5DE-45A1-B350-A54BFB532C35@microsoft.com... > Hi there, > > we use a spam appliance that adds an entry into the
headers of any emails
> that it thinks are spam. > > I want to be able to setup a global rule on our
exchange 2003 server to
> place these emails in the users Junk mail folder. > > would this be possible? > > thanks >
From:
Bharat Suneja [MVP] <bharat@nospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Force MRM to run? (2007)
Date:
Start-ManagedFolderAssistant
Exchange Server 2007: Why aren't Managed Content
Settngs applied?
http://exchangepedia.com/blog/2007/04/exchange-server-2007-why-arent-managed.html
--
Bharat Suneja MVP - Exchange www.zenprise.com NEW blog location: exchangepedia.com/blog ----------------------------------------------
"John W" wrote in message
news:%23TeqZQeCIHA.4836@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Is there a way to force the MRM policy to run? I've
created one and
> applied it to my mailbox and set up the schedular
to run anytime today,
> but I was really wanting to not wait
forever....anyone know a way to force
> it to apply policies, or run, or whatever it is
that it does? > > -John >
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global address list edit
Date:
"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
>On > wrote: > >>There is really no way to edit the GAL? It's just
an ldap query.. >> >The GAL doesn't exist as its own entity. It's a
function of AD. Change >the display name in AD and you change the GAL. >If you know all about ldap then get on with it.
Quickest would >actually to use CSVDE to haul everything out, use
excel to edit it and >then haul it all back in again.
CSVDE cannot be used to change anything. LDIFDE can
do that.
--
Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP MS Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global address list edit
Date:
The GAL is the GAL. If you want to follow the article
and do another GAL then you can use an attribute to filter out
users. I'm fairly sure (no 2003 image up and running at the moment) that
like with Rcipient Policies, you can't reliably use OUs and would need
to select an attribute on the security principal (user/contact
etc.)
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global address list edit
Date:
Sounds like a plan if you've got the support calls
available in your contract/plan. When you talk to them don't focus on the users or
anything like that. Stay on the permissions and how best you will manage
who gets what view, and in what client.
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global address list edit
Date:
I strongly urge you not to create a new GAL. It's a
support nightmare. The stats that Microsoft PSS produced some years ago
made a few people go pale, really.
There are just so many ways to change the information
in AD. All you need to do is to change the display name.
And that article isn't even the answer to the
question you asked.
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global address list edit
Date:
On wrote:
>There is really no way to edit the GAL? It's just an
ldap query.. > The GAL doesn't exist as its own entity. It's a
function of AD. Change the display name in AD and you change the GAL. If you know all about ldap then get on with it.
Quickest would actually to use CSVDE to haul everything out, use
excel to edit it and then haul it all back in again.
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Global address list edit
Date:
On wrote:
>How do I edit the Global address list to only
include users with a specific
>domain sufix like: > >users@mail.com? > >With out including users from another mail domain... > >Thanks, > >Cactus
> You can't edit the GAL to do that. There is such a
thing as an "Address List" which can be shown as a separate
folder under the GAL. It all depends on what you want to do and more
importantly why.
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Hints For 5.5 -> 2003 Migration
Date:
It's the distinguished name of the Exchange 5.5
mailbox. You can read it
using LDP or by starting Exchange 5.5 Admin in raw
mode (ADMIN /R) and
opening the mailbox's raw properties. --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Wolle" wrote in message
news:470c9f9f$0$16108$81a1b74c@newsspool1.isis.de... > Hello David, > > thanks. I've filled out the Shuttle Manager forms
and waiting > for my account to test. > > Hello Ed, > > I need your help. I export the pst to surname.pst.
In the AD I > set the x500 address manualy. Is the x500 address
the old NT > or the new 2003 structure? How can I read this out
with ldp.exe? > > Thanks a lot. > > Christian
From:
Ed Crowley [MVP] <curspice@mvpsnospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Host can't see guest entries in shared calendar
Date:
That's interesting and I've never heard of that
before. Why would you be
disconnecting and creating new mailboxes? --
Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"mohaaron" wrote in message
news:1191889525.683619.184100@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com... > What I mean by host and guest I got from an article
I read about how > to share outlook/exchange calendars. The host is
the one sharing their > calendar and the guest is the one being invited to
use the shared > calendar. Anyway, I've found that if you have a
host sharing their > calendar with a guest and the host has their
mailbox disconnected and > a new one created the guest is still looking at the
old disconnected > calendar. > > On Oct 8, >> I don't understand your use of the terms host and
guest. A shared
>> calendar >> is a mailbox, and a mailbox resides in the
database of an Exchange
>> server, >> at least in the context of this newsgroup. >> >> The one thing I can suggest you look at based on
what little I understand >> about your problem is to verify that your Outlook
clients aren't running
>> in >> cached mode, whcih can delay the appearance or
posting of changes to a >> mailbox. >> -- >> Ed Crowley >> MVP - Exchange >> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick
backups!" >> >> "mohaaron" wrote in message >> >>
news:1191883009.891133.8300@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... >> >> > We have setup one of our client machines as a
host for a shared >> > calendar and then setup one other machine as the
guest for the shared >> > calendar and now the host can't see the entries
made by the guest. >> > This did work correctly for quite some time and
now there are entires >> > from the guest missing from the host's calendar.
Does anyone have any >> > idea how this might happen and how to fix it? >
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: How to change neame format in Exch. 2003
Date:
That's just the display name. Change that to display
it the other ay around. It's one of those things that you needed to
do up front rather than after the fact. Just wondering if you can do a mass change with
admodify.net......
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: How to configure Exchange to have different SMTP addresses depending on
a group?
Date:
On wrote:
>Hello, > >I need to configure Exchange 2003 in this scenario:
I want that users >(by default) have a specific primary SMTP address,
but when a user is >member of a specific group I need to add another
primary SMTP address. >If the user is not member again, that SMTP address
must disappear... > >So, I have two cases: > >1. Default users have only one SMTP address (with de
default domain) >2. Users that are members of a specific group must
have the previous >SMTP address too, but another primary address
(@anotherdomain.com). > >This second address have to be set and removed
automatically, using >RUS, if possible. > >How would I configure RUS for this?... I've tried it
but doesn't work >as I expected... >Thanks!
It's not the RUS. You'd need a recipient policy to do
this. Although your question is a little unclear.
I read it that you want everyone to have
primary@domain.com but if they are also a member of domain\groupX you also want
them to have secondary@anotherdomain.com as an additional address.
If that's right then RPs is the way to go.
From:
Alexander Zammit [MVP] <alex@respond_to_group>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: How to have anti-spam feature with just one Exchange Server 2007 ?
Date:
You can install the anti-spam agents on the Hub
Transport. See details from
here:
http://exchangepedia.com/blog/2006/09/how-to-install-anti-spam-agents-on-hub.html
--
Alexander Zammit WinDeveloper Software IMF Tune - Unleash the Full Intelligent Message
Filter Power http://www.windeveloper.com/imftune/
"user" wrote in message
news:eZ6DxW%23BIHA.5600@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Hello, > I have fine migrate from Exchange 2003 to Exchange
2007 in a simple AD
> domain. But i see that i can not have the anti-spam
feature because i have
> not the Edge role ... how should i do to have this
role on my single
> Exchange 2007 server ? I have a Esafe smtp gateway
that kill the virus and
> i would like to have just one Exchange server for
my domain ... > > PS : do i have to paid to have a second Echange
2007 server with Edge role
> ? > > Help me please... > >
From:
Bharat Suneja [MVP] <bharat@nospam.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: I need to create a NON-HA standby Exchange 2000 server.
Date:
You'll need to look at 3rd party solutions for
replication. Exchange
2000/2003 do not provide such functionality out of
the box - Exchange Server
2007 does.
--
Bharat Suneja MVP - Exchange www.zenprise.com NEW blog location: exchangepedia.com/blog ----------------------------------------------
"celarsen" wrote in message
news:3C89D4C5-103A-4EB7-88E7-5782AF4A4C92@microsoft.com... >I need to create a backup (standby) Exch 2000
server. It does not need to
>be > HA. (I believe that cannot be done.) All I want to
do is keep a current
> copy > of the live data on a second Exch 2000 server that
I could point the > workstations to if there is a problem with the main
server. The only thing > that needs to be automatic is the data replication.
From:
Lee Derbyshire [MVP] <email a@t leederbyshire d.0.t c.0.m>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Implementing OWA
Date:
You have no DNS records pointing to
domain.com/exchange ? That is normal -
the DNS record points to domain.com , and the server
sorts out the /exchange
part.
"Jeff" wrote in message
news:2D1B5D1B-34E3-457D-8215-48237602F899@microsoft.com... > OK, well this brings me to another interesting
question. We can access our > OWA through the current domain name right now and
as far as I know, we
> have > no DNS records pointing traffic to our exchange
server for > domain.com/exchange. However, it still works. How
is it working?? > > "Lee Derbyshire [MVP]" wrote: > >> >> Heh, sometimes a reboot is the best solution. Not
always convenient, >> though. >> >> To get it working with both names, you need to
configure the DNS records
>> of >> the new domain so that there is a host name (maybe
owa.newdomain.com) >> pointing to the same IP address as is currently
being used by the
>> existing >> domain. >> >> As long as the traffic reaches the server, it
doesn't care what name is >> being used. The exception to this is if your
Default Web Site has been >> configured with a 'host header name', in which
case that is the only name
>> it >> will accept. >> >> >> "Jeff" wrote in message >>
news:D338433C-0F45-4885-9C31-4D02251F1490@microsoft.com... >> > OK, I suppose I should have done this sooner but
I finally just
>> > rebooted >> > the >> > server and now everything works fine. I really
don't know what was
>> > going >> > on >> > but the reboot worked. I know for sure that the
www service was running >> > before the reboot. It just must have gotten
hosed or something. On
>> > another >> > note, our company changed names a few weeks ago.
I'd like to get the
>> > OWA >> > to >> > work using the new domain name. If I try it with
the new name, it give
>> > me >> > a >> > page cannot be displayed. What would be the best
way to make it so that >> > both >> > domain names can be used for OWA? We made it so
that our old domain
>> > name >> > redirects to the new one. Would something like
that work with OWA?
>> > Thanks >> > for >> > the help! >> > >> > "Lee Derbyshire [MVP]" wrote: >> > >> >> Strange that there should be no IIS logs since
that day. Are you sure >> >> that >> >> the WWW service is running on the server? >> >> >> >> "Jeff" wrote in message >> >>
news:F5011EC9-4A7F-478B-8355-6FDB386F2E9B@microsoft.com... >> >> > OK, I turned off the friendly http errors. I
also looked at the IIS >> >> > logs. >> >> > Ironically, the last log file is from 10/5
which is the last day OWA >> >> > worked. >> >> > I tried accessing the site again after
turning off the friendly
>> >> > errors >> >> > and >> >> > the error is still the same. >> >> > >> >> > "Lee Derbyshire [MVP]" wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Can you have a look in your IE Advanced
Options, and make sure that >> >> >> 'Friendly HTTP Errors' is not enabled. The
so-called Friendly
>> >> >> Error >> >> >> messages hide all of the useful information. >> >> >> >> >> >> Also, have a look in your IIS logs, and let
us know what entries
>> >> >> are >> >> >> generated when you try to use OWA. Note that
the times in those
>> >> >> logs >> >> >> are >> >> >> in >> >> >> GMT. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Jeff" wrote in message >> >> >>
news:272161AD-96A0-4D51-876D-F2DB2A4E02CE@microsoft.com... >> >> >> > Internet Explorer cannot display the
webpage >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Most likely causes: >> >> >> > You are not connected to the Internet. >> >> >> > The website is encountering problems. >> >> >> > There might be a typing error in the
address. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > "Lee Derbyshire [MVP]" wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> That's a different error message you
mentioned just there. Can
>> >> >> >> you >> >> >> >> say >> >> >> >> exactly what is displayed? 'internet
explorer cannot display
>> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> webpage' >> >> >> >> is a generic message, and can have many
causes, whereas your >> >> >> >> original >> >> >> >> 'page >> >> >> >> not found' can have only a few. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Jeff" wrote in message >> >> >> >>
news:084C47B4-BCD9-4690-BA68-2C338586EF21@microsoft.com... >> >> >> >> > Yes, there is. However, I still can't
access the OWA page. It >> >> >> >> > just >> >> >> >> > gives >> >> >> >> > me a >> >> >> >> > "internet explorer cannot display the
webpage" error. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > "Lee Derbyshire [MVP]" wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> "Jeff" wrote in message >> >> >> >> >>
news:FFCABA21-91D9-426E-A2B3-E4326739D39D@microsoft.com... >> >> >> >> >> > I'm rather new to Exchange. Can
someone tell me where I can >> >> >> >> >> > find >> >> >> >> >> > an >> >> >> >> >> > easy >> >> >> >> >> > to >> >> >> >> >> > understand document on how to
implement OWA for Exchange
>> >> >> >> >> > 2003? >> >> >> >> >> > I >> >> >> >> >> > just >> >> >> >> >> > have >> >> >> >> >> > the one exchange server but my web
server is separate. From >> >> >> >> >> > what >> >> >> >> >> > I >> >> >> >> >> > gather, >> >> >> >> >> > OWA is automatically installed
during the exchange install, >> >> >> >> >> > however, >> >> >> >> >> > when >> >> >> >> >> > I >> >> >> >> >> > type in https:///exchange, I get
page cannot be >> >> >> >> >> > found. >> >> >> >> >> > I >> >> >> >> >> > also >> >> >> >> >> > tried http:///exchange. Any help
would be
>> >> >> >> >> > greatly >> >> >> >> >> > appreciated >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, it should already be installed.
Start IIS Manager on
>> >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> >> Exchange >> >> >> >> >> server, expand the Default Web Site,
and make sure that there
>> >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> >> a >> >> >> >> >> Virtual >> >> >> >> >> Directory named Exchange under it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Lee. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >>
_______________________________________ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Outlook Web Access for PDA, OWA For
WAP: >> >> >> >> >> www.leederbyshire.com >> >> >> >> >>
________________________________________ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
From:
Mark Arnold [MVP] <mark@mvps.org>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Is this true ? Public Folder can't receive Out of Office reply ?
Date:
On wrote:
>When sending emails from a public folder as a
mail-enable recipient to
>another exchange mailbox that has their out of
office agent enable, the
>public folder mailbox will not receive the out of
office mail. > >Whereas if you were to send an email from your
exchange mailbox, you will
>receive an out of office message from the person you
are sending to. > >If this is true, any Microsoft knowledge base
supporting it ? >I have been trying to find some supporting document
but still no luck yet
>... > >Thanks, >Steven
> Yes it's true and I don't know if there's an article.
It's been that way for 15 years or so. If there isn't one I could
write it as a 555 series article but what's that going to get you,
really?
From:
Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>
To:
none
Subject:
Re: Looking for a Registry value
Date:
TLMPLHou66 wrote:
>Looking for a Registry value for the mailbox store
property "Do Not Mount
>this store at start-up" >Any idea where this is located in the registry?
It's in the AD, not the registry.
--
Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Don't send mail to this address
mailto:h.pott@getronics.com Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
Post your questions, comments, feedbacks and suggestions Related Topics |
|
|
|
|
This web is provided "AS IS" with no warranties.
Copyright © 2002-2009
ChicagoTech.net,
All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction forbidden.